Surgery Versus Chemoradiation Therapy for Oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Multidimensional Cross-Sectional Study
- PMID: 40277817
- PMCID: PMC12025535
- DOI: 10.3390/diseases13040106
Surgery Versus Chemoradiation Therapy for Oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Multidimensional Cross-Sectional Study
Abstract
Background/objectives: The management of oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC) often involves multidisciplinary decision-making to optimize patient outcomes. Surgery and chemoradiation therapy (CRT) represent the two main treatment modalities. The aim of this cross-sectional study was to provide a comprehensive analysis of quality of life, speech, swallowing, sleep, psychological distress, and nutritional status in OPSCC patients treated with either surgery or CRT.
Methods: Thirty subjects were divided into two groups based on treatment modality (>12-month follow-up): (A) surgery ± adjuvant treatment (15 patients); (B) exclusive CRT (15 patients). A multidimensional evaluation was performed by means of validated questionnaires. The following parameters were analyzed: quality of life, speech, swallowing, sleep quality, risk of sleep apnea, sleepiness, psychological distress, pain, and nutritional status.
Results: No statistically significant difference was found between the two study groups for every parameter. The EORTC QLQ-C30 globally showed a good quality of life in both groups. Poor sleep quality was observed in 9 (60%) subjects in group A and in 6 (40%) patients in group B, respectively. Low, intermediate and high risk of malnutrition was observed in 73.3%, 20.0% and 6.7% of cases in group A, and in 93.3%, 6.7% and 0.0% in group B, respectively.
Conclusions: Surgery and exclusive chemoradiotherapy appear to yield similar long-term outcomes across all evaluated dimensions, including quality of life, speech, swallowing, sleep, psychological distress, and nutritional status.
Keywords: chemoradiation; oropharyngeal cancer; oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma; psychological distress; quality of life; sleep; surgery.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Figures


References
-
- Riva G., Pecorari G., Biolatti M., Pautasso S., Cigno I.L., Garzaro M., Dell’oste V., Landolfo S. PYHIN genes as potential biomarkers for prognosis of human papillomavirus-positive or -negative head and neck squamous cell carcinomas. Mol. Biol. Rep. 2019;46:3333–3347. doi: 10.1007/s11033-019-04795-7. - DOI - PubMed
-
- Arboleda L.P.A., de Carvalho G.B., Santos-Silva A.R., Fernandes G.A., Vartanian J.G., Conway D.I., Virani S., Brennan P., Kowalski L.P., Curado M.P. Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Oral Cavity, Oropharynx, and Larynx: A Scoping Review of Treatment Guidelines Worldwide. Cancers. 2023;15:4405. doi: 10.3390/cancers15174405. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Meccariello G., Cammaroto G., Iannella G., De Vito A., Ciorba A., Bianchini C., Corazzi V., Pelucchi S., Vicini C., Capaccio P. Transoral robotic surgery for oropharyngeal cancer in the era of chemoradiation therapy. Auris Nasus Larynx. 2022;49:535–546. doi: 10.1016/j.anl.2022.01.011. - DOI - PubMed
-
- Howard J., Masterson L., Dwivedi R.C., Riffat F., Benson R., Jefferies S., Jani P., Tysome J.R., Nutting C. Minimally invasive surgery versus radiotherapy/chemoradiotherapy for small-volume primary oropharyngeal carcinoma. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2016;2016:CD010963. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010963.pub2. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Nichols A.C., Theurer J., Prisman E., Read N., Berthelet E., Tran E., Fung K., de Almeida J.R., Bayley A., Goldstein D.P., et al. Radiotherapy Versus Transoral Robotic Surgery for Oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: Final Results of the ORATOR Randomized Trial. J. Clin. Oncol. 2024;42:4023–4028. doi: 10.1200/JCO.24.00119. - DOI - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials