Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Apr 3;15(4):53.
doi: 10.3390/ejihpe15040053.

Individual Work Attitudes and Work Ability

Affiliations

Individual Work Attitudes and Work Ability

Nicola Magnavita et al. Eur J Investig Health Psychol Educ. .

Abstract

Work capacity depends on many factors, including the age and health status of the employee, but also on personal characteristics and attitudes, such as reduced tolerance of unfavorable working conditions (Work Annoyance, WA), excessive commitment to work (Overcommitment, OC), passion for work (Work Engagement, WE), and social interactions (Social Capital, SC). A total of 1309 workers who underwent a medical examination at work completed questionnaires on work attitudes and assessed their work ability using the Work Ability Score (WAS). The relationship between variables expressing work attitudes and WAS was studied using hierarchical linear regression and moderation analyses. WA is associated with low WAS values; SC is a positive predictor of WAS and moderates the effect of WA on WAS. OC reduces work ability, while Vigor and Dedication, components of WE, have a strong positive effect on work ability. To improve the work ability of employees, employers and managers should improve social relations in the workplace and discourage overcommitment. A positive working environment can increase engagement and avoid triggers of work annoyance.

Keywords: capacity; health promotion; health surveillance; overcommitment; productivity; psychosocial stress; social capital; work ability index; work annoyance; work engagement.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Interaction plot of the moderating effect of Social Capital in the interaction between Work Annoyance and Work Ability (from Model VI).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Abbasi M., Zakerian A., Kolahdouzi M., Mehri A., Akbarzadeh A., Ebrahimi M. H. Relationship between work ability index and cognitive failure among nurses. Electronic Physiciane. 2016;8(3):2136–2143. doi: 10.19082/2136. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Adriaenssens J., De Gucht V., Maes S. Causes and consequences of occupational stress in emergency nurses, a longitudinal study. Journal of Nursing Management. 2015;23(3):346–358. doi: 10.1111/jonm.12138. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Afota M. C., Robert V., Vandenberghe C. Workaholism, work engagement, and affective commitment: Relationships to self-concept levels and work outcomes. Frontiers in Psychology. 2025;15:1434482. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1434482. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Agnew L., Johnston V., Landén Ludvigsson M., Peterson G., Overmeer T., Johansson G., Peolsson A. Factors associated with work ability in patients with chronic whiplash-associated disorder grade II-III: A cross-sectional analysis. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine. 2015;47(6):546–551. doi: 10.2340/16501977-1960. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Airila A., Hakanen J., Punakallio A., Lusa S., Luukkonen R. Is work engagement related to work ability beyond working conditions and lifestyle factors? International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health. 2012;85(8):915–925. doi: 10.1007/s00420-012-0732-1. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources