Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2025 Mar 24;15(4):123.
doi: 10.3390/jpm15040123.

Non-Adherence Rate to Oral Mesalamine in Ulcerative Colitis Patients: A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis

Affiliations
Review

Non-Adherence Rate to Oral Mesalamine in Ulcerative Colitis Patients: A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis

Cristiano Pagnini et al. J Pers Med. .

Abstract

Background/Objectives: Ulcerative colitis (UC) is a part of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) and it is characterized by colonic-mucosal chronic inflammation with intermittent clinical activity. Personalized medicine is becoming more and more a relevant method of approach in this field, and the identification of potential concerns in a single patient may contribute to the improvement of the clinical approach. Mesalamine represents the cornerstone of therapy for mild-moderate disease forms, but non-adherence to medical therapy represents a critical health problem, although it is underestimated by many physicians, with evident consequences in terms of disease-related complications. The aim of the present study is to evaluate the magnitude of non-adherence to oral mesalamine in UC patients performing a systematic review and meta-analysis of literature. Methods: A literature search in PubMed and Cochrane databases was performed for studies reporting the non-adherence rate to oral mesalamine in adult UC patients, and eligible studies have been selected for evaluation. The type of study (trial vs. observational), geographic area, sample size, method of adherence assessment, and non-adherence rate were considered. Results: From a total of 464 articles, 34 studies were included in the meta-analysis after selection. Sixteen studies (47%) are observational, and eighteen (53%) are clinical trials. A total of 12/34 (35%) studies are from North America, 14/34 (41%) from Europe, 4/34 (12%) from Asia, with 4/34 (12%) from mixed areas of the world. The mean non-adherence rate was 32%, but with a consistent variability among the studies. In particular, the non-adherence rate was significantly higher in observational studies vs. clinical trials (47 vs. 20%, p < 0.001), and in North American vs. European and Asian studies (54 vs. 23 vs. 4%, respectively, p < 0.001). Conclusions: The non-adherence rate to oral mesalamine is variably reported in the literature due to the inhomogeneity of available studies, but it represents a consistent problem, often neglected, that deserves future research. A personalized approach by a physician to a single patient can improve the effectiveness of medical therapy and the management of UC patients.

Keywords: adherence; inflammatory bowel disease; mesalamine; ulcerative colitis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Summary of evidence search and selection for the non-adherence rate for oral mesalamine in adult UC patients.
Figure 2
Figure 2
The non-adherence rate in published studies. (A) The non-adherence rate (%) in the 34 studies included in the meta-analysis; (B) box plot with representation of the upper and lower values, median, and interquartile range for the non-adherence rate in the included studies; (C) the significant different non-adherence rate in observational studies vs. trials; (D) the significant different non-adherence rate in studies from North America, Europe and Asia; (E) considering separately observational studies and trials in the different geographic areas, significant difference emerged in North American studies. NA = North America, EU = Europe, * = p < 0.05, ** p < 0.001, *** = p < 0.0001.

References

    1. Sabaté E. Adherence to Long-Term Therapies: Evidence for Action. World Health Organization; Geneva, Switzerland: 2003.
    1. Religioni U., Barrios-Rodríguez R., Requena P., Borowska M., Ostrowski J. Enhancing Therapy Adherence: Impact on Clinical Outcomes, Healthcare Costs, and Patient Quality of Life. Medicina. 2025;61:153. doi: 10.3390/medicina61010153. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Burnier M. The role of adherence in patients with chronic diseases. Eur. J. Intern. Med. 2024;119:1–5. doi: 10.1016/j.ejim.2023.07.008. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Dunbar-Jacob J., Erlen J.A., Schlenk E.A., Ryan C.M., Sereika S.M., Doswell W.M. Adherence in chronic disease. Annu. Rev. Nurs. Res. 2000;18:48–90. doi: 10.1891/0739-6686.18.1.48. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Alcântara L., Figueiredo T., Costa E. Exploring the Perceptions and Self-Perceptions of Therapeutic Adherence in Older Adults with Chronic Conditions: A Scoping Review. Patient Prefer. Adherence. 2025;19:503–526. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S496707. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources