Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Apr 4;15(4):143.
doi: 10.3390/jpm15040143.

Pulsed Electromagnetic Field Therapy Alters the Genomic Profile of Bladder Cancer Cell Line HT-1197

Affiliations

Pulsed Electromagnetic Field Therapy Alters the Genomic Profile of Bladder Cancer Cell Line HT-1197

Maxwell Sandberg et al. J Pers Med. .

Abstract

Background/Objectives: Pulsed electromagnetic field (PEMF) therapy involves the use of magnetic waveform energy for targeted treatment delivery. This technique has shown promising results in the treatment of various cancers. Currently, treatment of bladder cancer is highly invasive, involving intravesical chemotherapy or radical cystectomy. The potential therapeutic effects of PEMF therapy on bladder cancer are a relatively new and understudied area; therefore, the goal of this investigation was to gain mechanistic insight by examining the effects of PEMF therapy on a bladder cancer cell line in vitro. Methods: Cells from the bladder cancer cell line HT-1197 were cultured and incubated with (treatment group) or without (control group) PEMF therapy for one hour each day for five days. Cell counts were compared using Incucyte® data to determine proliferation rates. At days 1 and 5, total RNA was isolated from cells, and following quantity and quality checks, gene expression was compared between the two groups. Proliferation rates from cell line HT-1197 were compared to prior published results on the bladder cancer cell line HT-1376. Results: HT-1197 cells treated with PEMF therapy had slower proliferation rates compared to controls (p < 0.05), but HT-1376 cells did not (p > 0.05). Principal component analysis showed complete separation of treated and untreated cells, with PEMF treatment accounting for 76% of the variation between the groups. Expression of numerous genes and cancer-related pathways was altered in the treated cells relative to the controls. Conclusions: Bladder cancer HT-1197 cells treated with PEMF therapy had slower proliferation and corresponding changes in gene expression. Several cancer-relevant pathways were differentially regulated following PEMF treatment. The conclusions are limited by the lack of a control healthy urothelial cell line in the experiments. Despite this shortcoming, our results suggest that PEMF therapy may be a promising avenue for further research in the treatment of bladder cancer.

Keywords: HT-1197; bladder cancer; non-invasive; pulsed electromagnetic field therapy; therapeutic; urology.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Mutations of bladder cancer cell line HT-1197. Tumor stage, grade, and histology are shown. Additionally, relevant genes that are either wild type or mutated are reported, with a legend corresponding to each gene. Figure adapted from Rasheed et al. [11].
Figure 2
Figure 2
Experimental setup for pulsed electromagnetic field therapy administration. A Helmholtz coil was placed inside a temperature-controlled incubator. During treatment sessions, the culture plates containing the HT-1197 cells were placed at the same locale within the magnetic field, which was verified with a gauss meter. The field of treatment was determined to be uniform over the entire area of the culture plates.
Figure 3
Figure 3
HT-1197 cells in culture. HT-1197 bladder cancer cells prior to beginning the experiment under a microscope at 10x magnification. Cells can be seen in clusters intact growing appropriately before the experiment was started. Both PEMF and control cells came from this cell line. A scale is provided in the bottom-right corner of the figure.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Cell growth curves. Representation of the exponential growth curves of both the control (blue) and PEMF-treated cells (orange). The x-axis is time from the start of the experiment in hours and cell count is on the y-axis. The 0:00:00 time point represents the start of PEMF treatment on day one of the experiment. On both curves, “e” represents Euler’s number, a constant value of 2.718281828459. (a) Exponential growth lines with equations are provided for HT-1197 PEMF and control cells. (b) Exponential growth lines with equations are provided for HT-1376 PEMF and control cells.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Principal component analysis and hierarchical clustering. (a) PCA was performed using gene expression profiles from control (purple) and experimental (green) samples. (b) Hierarchical clustering revealed 49 DETs between the groups. “None” represents the control cells and “PEMF” the experimentally treated cells. Red represents upregulated DETs (PEMF vs. control) and blue downregulated.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Cancer-relevant pathways. (A) The cancer drug resistance efflux pathway was downregulated in PEMF-treated cells. It normally works to remove the concentration of cancer drug inside a tumor cell. (B) The G1/S checkpoint regulation pathway, which acts to halt the cell cycle when damage to DNA is detected, was upregulated in PEMF-treated cells. (C) The PI3K/AKT pathway normally acts to promote cell survival and proliferation when activated. It was downregulated in PEMF-treated cells. Figure created with BioRender.com.

Similar articles

References

    1. Yang X., He H., Ye W., Perry T.A., He C. Effects of Pulsed Electromagnetic Field Therapy on Pain, Stiffness, Physical Function, and Quality of Life in Patients with Osteoarthritis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Placebo-Controlled Trials. Phys. Ther. 2020;100:1118–1131. doi: 10.1093/ptj/pzaa054. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Flatscher J., Loriè E.P., Mittermayr R., Meznik P., Slezak P., Redl H., Slezak C. Pulsed Electromagnetic Fields (PEMF)—Physiological Response and Its Potential in Trauma Treatment. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023;24:11239. doi: 10.3390/ijms241411239. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Wade B. A Review of Pulsed Electromagnetic Field (PEMF) Mechanisms at a Cellular Level: A Rationale for Clinical Use. Am. J. Health Res. 2013;1:51. doi: 10.11648/j.ajhr.20130103.13. - DOI
    1. Wolff D.T., Ross C., Lee P., Badlani G., Matthews C.A., Evans R.J., Walker S.J. Pulsed Electromagnetic Field Therapy for Pain Management in Interstitial Cystitis/Bladder Pain Syndrome: A Proof-of-Concept Case Series. Urology. 2022;167:96–101. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2022.05.021. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Picelli A., DI CENSO R., Tomasello S., Scaturro D., Mauro G.L., Smania N., Filippetti M. Effects of pulsed electromagnetic fields on bone fractures: A systematic review update. Eur. J. Phys. Rehabil. Med. 2024;60:989–994. doi: 10.23736/S1973-9087.24.08226-1. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources