Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Apr 4;15(4):144.
doi: 10.3390/jpm15040144.

Comparative Changes in Fecal Microbiome After Endoscopic Resection and Surgical Resection in Gastric Cancer Patients

Affiliations

Comparative Changes in Fecal Microbiome After Endoscopic Resection and Surgical Resection in Gastric Cancer Patients

Hochan Seo et al. J Pers Med. .

Abstract

Background/Objectives: Gastric cancer treatments can lead to significant alterations to patients' gastrointestinal microbiome. However, differences in microbial impacts between gastrectomy and endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) remain underexplored. This study investigates how these treatments influence microbial diversity and composition in patients with stage I gastric cancer. Methods: Patients with pathologically confirmed stage I gastric cancer were recruited from Chung-Ang University Hospital between December 2016 and December 2019. This study analyzed fecal samples from 13 patients (ESD: n = 5; gastrectomy: n = 8) before and after treatment using 16S rRNA gene sequencing. Microbial diversity indices and taxonomic composition were compared, with follow-up extending up to two years. Results: In the total cohort, alpha diversity significantly decreased post-treatment (p < 0.05), and beta diversity analysis showed distinct clustering between pre- and post-treatment samples (p < 0.05). At the genus level, Bacteroides significantly decreased (p < 0.05), while Lactobacillus, Bifidobacterium, and Blautia showed significant increases (p < 0.05). Comparative analyses revealed that in the ESD group, alpha diversity remained unchanged, although beta diversity showed significant clustering (p < 0.05), without notable changes in major taxa. In contrast, surgical resection resulted in a significant reduction in alpha diversity (p < 0.05) and beta diversity clustering (p < 0.05), with increased abundances of Streptococcus and Blautia and decreased abundance of Bacteroides (p < 0.05). Conclusions: Surgical gastrectomy exerts significant effects on microbiome diversity and composition, while ESD has a more limited impact. These findings underscore the importance of considering microbiome changes in postoperative management.

Keywords: endoscopic submucosal dissection; gastrectomy; gastric cancer; gut microbiome.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Comparison of alpha diversity, beta diversity, and relative abundance between pre-treatment microbiome in ESD and Surgery groups. (A) Alpha diversity measures, including Observed, Chao1, Shannon, and Simpson indices, were compared between the ESD and Surgery groups. (B) Principal Coordinate Analysis (PCoA) using Bray-Curtis dissimilarity was performed to examine the beta diversity of the microbiomes at both phylum and genus levels. (C) Bar graphs illustrating the microbiome composition at the phylum and genus levels in both groups, showing the relative abundance of major bacterial taxa present before treatment. ns: p ≥ 0.05.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Comparison of alpha diversity, beta diversity, and relative abundance between pre- and post-treatment. (A) Alpha diversity measures, including Observed, Chao1, Shannon, and Simpson indices, were compared between the ESD and Surgery groups. (B) Principal Coordinate Analysis (PCoA) using Bray-Curtis dissimilarity was performed to examine the beta diversity of the microbiomes at both phylum and genus levels. (C) Bar graphs illustrating the microbiome composition at the phylum and genus levels in both groups, showing the relative abundance of major bacterial taxa present before treatment. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, ns: p ≥ 0.05.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Comparison of alpha diversity, beta diversity, and relative abundance between pre- and post-treatment in ESD group. (A) Alpha diversity measures, including Observed, Chao1, Shannon, and Simpson indices, were compared between pre- and post-treatment in ESD group. (B) Principal Coordinate Analysis (PCoA) using Bray-Curtis dissimilarity was performed to examine the beta diversity of the microbiomes at both phylum and genus levels. (C) Bar graphs illustrating the microbiome composition at the phylum and genus levels in both groups, showing the relative abundance of major bacterial taxa present before treatment. * p < 0.05, ns: p ≥ 0.05.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Comparison of alpha diversity, beta diversity, and relative abundance between pre- and post-treatment in Surgery group. (A) Alpha diversity measures, including Observed, Chao1, Shannon, and Simpson indices, were compared between pre- and post-treatment in Surgery group. (B) Principal Coordinate Analysis (PCoA) using Bray-Curtis dissimilarity was performed to examine the beta diversity of the microbiomes at both phylum and genus levels. (C) Bar graphs illustrating the microbiome composition at the phylum and genus levels in both groups, showing the relative abundance of major bacterial taxa present before treatment. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, ns: p ≥ 0.05.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Tan N., Wu H., Cao M., Yang F., Yan X., He S., Cao M., Zhang S., Teng Y., Li Q., et al. Global, regional, and national burden of early-onset gastric cancer. Cancer Biol. Med. 2024;21:667–678. doi: 10.20892/j.issn.2095-3941.2024.0159. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Shirani M., Pakzad R., Haddadi M.H., Akrami S., Asadi A., Kazemian H., Moradi M., Kaviar V.H., Zomorodi A.R., Khoshnood S., et al. The global prevalence of gastric cancer in Helicobacter pylori-infected individuals: A systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Infect. Dis. 2023;23:543. doi: 10.1186/s12879-023-08504-5. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Zeng R., Gou H., Lau H.C.H., Yu J. Stomach microbiota in gastric cancer development and clinical implications. Gut. 2024;73:2062–2073. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2024-332815. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ağagündüz D., Cocozza E., Cemali Ö., Bayazıt A.D., Nanì M.F., Cerqua I., Morgillo F., Saygılı S.K., Canani R.B., Amero P., et al. Understanding the role of the gut microbiome in gastrointestinal cancer: A review. Front. Pharmacol. 2023;14:1130562. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2023.1130562. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kim I.-H., Kang S.J., Choi M., Kim B.-H., Eom B.W., Kim B.J., Min B.-H., Choi C.I., Shin C.M., Tae C.H., et al. Korean Practice Guidelines for Gastric Cancer 2022: An Evidence-based, Multidisciplinary Approach. J. Gastric Cancer. 2023;23:3–106. doi: 10.5230/jgc.2023.23.e11. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources