Implementing Personalized Cancer Medicine: Insights from a Qualitative Interview Study
- PMID: 40278329
- PMCID: PMC12029028
- DOI: 10.3390/jpm15040150
Implementing Personalized Cancer Medicine: Insights from a Qualitative Interview Study
Abstract
Background: Personalized cancer medicine (PCM) tailors cancer treatments based on individual genetic profiles, enabling more precise and effective therapies. Despite its potential, integrating PCM into clinical practice remains challenging because of organizational and systemic barriers. This study examined the factors influencing PCM implementation at a major cancer center in Stockholm, Sweden. Methods: We conducted semi-structured interviews with 16 medical professionals and management staff from Karolinska University Hospital and Karolinska Institutet. Content analysis was used to identify key themes related to PCM implementation. This study followed the established Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research guidelines to ensure methodological rigor and transparency. Results: Informants framed PCM as both a technological innovation and a patient-centered approach. However, significant barriers to implementation were identified, including organizational inertia, fragmented funding models, and ethical challenges related to access and equity. Structural silos between academic and healthcare institutions complicate integration. Key facilitators include leadership commitment, cross-sectoral collaboration, and a supportive policy environment. Participants emphasized the need for integrated infrastructure, real-time data-sharing mechanisms, and interdisciplinary training programs to support PCM. Conclusions: Successful PCM implementation requires overcoming entrenched organizational and systemic barriers through a multi-stakeholder approach involving healthcare providers, researchers, policymakers, and patient advocates. The findings underscore the necessity of a "third-form organization" to mediate between academia and clinical care. Addressing these challenges requires adaptive governance models, evidence-based policy reforms, and sustainable funding frameworks. Future research should explore comparative contexts to enhance the scalability and generalizability of PCM integration strategies.
Keywords: cancer healthcare; cancer research; healthcare organization; implementation research; medical management; personalized cancer medicine; personalized medicine; precision medicine; precision oncology; translation research.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Similar articles
-
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12. Early Hum Dev. 2020. PMID: 33036834
-
Bridging the Divide: A Review on the Implementation of Personalized Cancer Medicine.J Pers Med. 2024 May 24;14(6):561. doi: 10.3390/jpm14060561. J Pers Med. 2024. PMID: 38929782 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Nurses' attitudes, practices, and barriers toward sustainability behaviors: a qualitative study.BMC Nurs. 2025 Apr 18;24(1):437. doi: 10.1186/s12912-025-03023-x. BMC Nurs. 2025. PMID: 40251631 Free PMC article.
-
Integrating precision cancer medicine into healthcare-policy, practice, and research challenges.Genome Med. 2016 Oct 24;8(1):108. doi: 10.1186/s13073-016-0362-4. Genome Med. 2016. PMID: 27776531 Free PMC article.
-
Impact of summer programmes on the outcomes of disadvantaged or 'at risk' young people: A systematic review.Campbell Syst Rev. 2024 Jun 13;20(2):e1406. doi: 10.1002/cl2.1406. eCollection 2024 Jun. Campbell Syst Rev. 2024. PMID: 38873396 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Cinti C., Trivella M.G., Joulie M., Ayoub H., Frenzel M., International Consortium for Personalised Medicine. Working Group ‘Personalised Medicine in Healthcare’ (WG2) The Roadmap toward Personalized Medicine: Challenges and Opportunities. J. Pers. Med. 2024;14:546. doi: 10.3390/jpm14060546. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources