Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Aug;32(8):6050-6057.
doi: 10.1245/s10434-025-17251-7. Epub 2025 Apr 25.

Feasibility of Pressurized Intraperitoneal Aerosol Chemotherapy (PIPAC) in a Rabbit Model of Peritoneal Metastases: PIPALIM Project

Affiliations

Feasibility of Pressurized Intraperitoneal Aerosol Chemotherapy (PIPAC) in a Rabbit Model of Peritoneal Metastases: PIPALIM Project

Sylvia M Bardet et al. Ann Surg Oncol. 2025 Aug.

Abstract

Background: Animal models are essential for testing new pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC) protocols; however, no immunocompetent animal model of peritoneal surface malignancies (PSMs) treated with PIPAC has been established. This study evaluated the feasibility, safety, and oncological efficacy of PIPAC in a rabbit PSM model.

Methods: The study was conducted in two phases: (1) Feasibility Assessment: Three healthy rabbits underwent three consecutive PIPAC procedures (saline) at weekly intervals. The rabbits' well-being, morbidity, mortality, and histological changes were monitored. (2) Treatment Phase: Rabbits with PSM were treated with PIPAC using oxaliplatin, cisplatin-doxorubicin, or saline. Parameters such as animal well-being, ascites volume, morbidity, Peritoneal Cancer Index (PCI), histological response (Peritoneal Regression Grading Score [PRGS]), tumor cell proliferation/apoptosis, and circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) levels were assessed.

Results: PIPAC was feasible and safe, with no increased morbidity or mortality. PIPAC demonstrated antitumor efficacy with lower PCI (control 21.6 vs. oxaliplatin 9.2 vs. cisplatin-doxorubicin 10.2; p < 0.001), improved histological response (PRGS: control 3.38 vs. oxaliplatin 1.95 vs. cisplatin-doxorubicin 1.85; p = 0.01), and reduced tumor cell proliferation (control 5.3% vs. oxaliplatin 0.82% vs. cisplatin-doxorubicin 0.62%; p < 0.0001). ctDNA levels showed promise for monitoring treatment response, warranting further investigation.

Conclusion: This study confirms the feasibility and effectiveness of PIPAC with oxaliplatin or cisplatin-doxorubicin in rabbits with PSM. The model provides a foundation for future research on PIPAC protocols and related treatments.

Keywords: Cancer; Intraperitoneal chemotherapy; PIPAC; Peritoneal metastases; Rabbit model.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
A HES staining and multiphoton imaging of rabbit visceral and parietal peritoneum with and without PIPAC. Scale bar in (a) = 50 µm. B Photographs of blue staining after PIPAC in intra-abdominal cavities illustrate the extent of nebulization diffusion (black arrowheads). M muscularis, PP parietal peritoneum, SHG second harmonic generation, StM striated muscle, SM submucosa, VP visceral peritoneum, SmM smooth muscle, Ve blood vessel, HES hematoxylin-eosin-saffron, PIPAC pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
A Impact of PIPAC-Oxa and PIPAC-CisP Doxo on rabbit well-being score versus control group. B Image of an abdominal CT scan at day 26 in a control rabbit revealed advanced peritoneal disease and bowel obstruction. C Mean score of the PCI in each treatment group. PIPAC pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy, CT computed tomography, PCI Peritoneal Cancer Index, Oxa oxaliplatin, CisP Doxo cisplatin-doxorubicin (mean ± standard deviation), * p < 0.05, ** < 0.01, *** p < 0.001
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Histological analyses at D26 after the third PIPAC treatment. A HR was evaluated based on the PRGS. B Cell death by apoptosis was assessed using the TUNEL assay. C Cell proliferation was evaluated via anti-Ki67 immunostaining. Scale bars are in included in each image. PIPAC pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy, HR histological response, PRGS Peritoneal Regression Grading Score, HES hematoxylin-eosin-saffron staining, Oxa oxaliplatin, CisP Doxo cisplatin-doxorubicin (mean ± standard deviation), * p < 0.05, ** < 0.01, *** p < 0.001, **** p < 0.0001
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
ctDNA levels (mean ± standard deviation) in A plasma, B abdominal ascites supernatant, and C ascites cell pellet are higher but not statistically significant in the untreated rabbit group (control PIPAC) compared with the treated groups (PIPAC with oxaliplatin or cisplatin-doxorubicin). D The mean of the three previous parameters shows a similar trend, although the differences are still not statistically significant. CtDNA circulating tumor DNA, Oxa oxaliplatin, CisP Doxo cisplatin-doxorubicin, PIPAC pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy

References

    1. Di Giorgio A, Macrì A, Ferracci F, Robella M, Visaloco M, De Manzoni G, et al. 10 years of pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC): a systematic review and meta-analysis. Cancers (Basel). 2023;15(4):1125. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Taibi A, Teixeira Farinha H, Durand Fontanier S, Sayedalamin Z, Hübner M, Sgarbura O. Pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy enhanced by electrostatic precipitation (ePIPAC) for patients with peritoneal metastases. Ann Surg Oncol. 2021;28(7):3852–60. - PubMed
    1. Lurvink RJ, Rovers KP, Nienhuijs SW, Creemers GJ, Burger JWA, de Hingh IHJ. Pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy with oxaliplatin (PIPAC-OX) in patients with colorectal peritoneal metastases-a systematic review. J Gastrointest Oncol. 2021;12(Suppl 1):S242–58. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Taliento C, Restaino S, Scutiero G, Arcieri M, Bernardi G, Martinello R, et al. Pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC) with cisplatin and doxorubicin in patients with ovarian cancer: a systematic review. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2023;49(12):107250. - PubMed
    1. Sgarbura O, Eveno C, Alyami M, Bakrin N, Guiral DC, Ceelen W, et al. Consensus statement for treatment protocols in pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC). Pleura Peritoneum. 2022;7(1):1–7. - PMC - PubMed

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources