Multilevel socioecological determinants of colorectal cancer screening among American Indian communities in New Mexico
- PMID: 40279075
- PMCID: PMC12354181
- DOI: 10.1007/s10552-025-01993-6
Multilevel socioecological determinants of colorectal cancer screening among American Indian communities in New Mexico
Abstract
Purpose: Low rates of colorectal cancer (CRC) screening and persistent racial disparities in CRC incidence and mortality among American Indian communities present an urgent public health concern in the United States. Although several evidence-based interventions exist for CRC screening, a gap remains in understanding how these interventions could be effectively implemented in American Indian communities given local contextual factors and preferences.
Methods: Using a community-based participatory research approach, we worked with two American Indian communities and their tribally operated healthcare facilities in New Mexico. To better understand the implementation context within each community, we conducted focus group discussions with two groups of stakeholders: (1) community members and (2) staff, providers, and physicians (collectively referred to as "healthcare professionals") who worked in the tribally operated healthcare facilities. We conducted our analysis of transcripts and notes from these discussions using a grounded theory approach to examine factors according to the multilevel influences on cancer care delivery.
Results: We convened six focus groups and listening sessions with healthcare professionals (n = 15) and community members (n = 65) from the two tribal communities in New Mexico. Participants described key factors likely to influence the implementation and uptake of CRC screening interventions in their communities across three ecological levels. From an individual perspective, several participants mentioned understanding the importance of screening as a cancer prevention intervention, even when individuals perceived themselves to be healthy. Interpersonally, participants highlighted the crucial role of provider recommendations around screening and indicated that listening to individuals share their personal healthcare experiences motivated the community members to get screened. Finally, from a healthcare system perspective, many providers mentioned the need for improved technology and care coordination to support the healthcare delivery within clinical settings to improve CRC screening rates.
Conclusions: Engaging community members and providers through a community-based participatory research approach allowed us to identify key determinants for the successful implementation of CRC screening interventions in tribal communities. Future research will examine the effectiveness and implementation of the multicomponent, multilevel interventions and strategies for improving CRC screening rates in tribal communities in New Mexico.
Keywords: American Indian; Colorectal cancer; Community-based participatory research; Implementation science; Multilevel analysis; Qualitative research; Screening.
© 2025. The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
Declarations. Conflict of interest: The authors declare that they have no financial or non-financial competing interests. Ethical approval: The UNM Health Sciences Center’s Human Research Review Committee (HRRC # 18-636) and the Southwest Tribal Institutional Review Board (SWT-2018-005) approved all aspects of the research protocol. Consent to participate: All participants receive a consent letter and are informed about the research objectives and they voluntarily choose to participate. Further, they are informed that there is a very small risk of loss of privacy/confidentiality. Participants provide verbal consent to participate. Since the research poses no more than minimal risk of harm, the UNM Health Sciences Center’s Human Research Review Committee and the Southwest Tribal Institutional Review Board approved verbal consent for participation. Consent to publish: Per the policies of the Tribe participating in the project, the Tribal leadership or its designees and the Tribal Institutional Review Board must consent for publication. In this instance, the Tribal and Healthcare leadership alongside the Southwestern Tribal Institutional Review Board have agreed to publication of the manuscript.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Prescription of Controlled Substances: Benefits and Risks.2025 Jul 6. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2025 Jan–. 2025 Jul 6. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2025 Jan–. PMID: 30726003 Free Books & Documents.
-
Stakeholders' perceptions and experiences of factors influencing the commissioning, delivery, and uptake of general health checks: a qualitative evidence synthesis.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Mar 20;3(3):CD014796. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014796.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025. PMID: 40110911
-
Perceptions and experiences of the prevention, detection, and management of postpartum haemorrhage: a qualitative evidence synthesis.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Nov 27;11(11):CD013795. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013795.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023. PMID: 38009552 Free PMC article.
-
Survivor, family and professional experiences of psychosocial interventions for sexual abuse and violence: a qualitative evidence synthesis.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Oct 4;10(10):CD013648. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013648.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022. PMID: 36194890 Free PMC article.
-
Factors that influence participation in physical activity for people with bipolar disorder: a synthesis of qualitative evidence.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Jun 4;6(6):CD013557. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013557.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024. PMID: 38837220 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Siegel RL, Miller KD, Wagle NS, Jemal A (2023) Cancer statistics, 2023. CA Cancer J Clin 73(1):17–48 - PubMed
-
- Kratzer TB, Jemal A, Miller KD, Nash S, Wiggins C, Redwood D et al (2023) Cancer statistics for American Indian and Alaska Native individuals, 2022: including increasing disparities in early onset colorectal cancer. CA Cancer J Clin 73(2):120–146 - PubMed
-
- Pankratz VS, Kanda D, Edwardson N, English K, Adsul P, Li Y et al (2022) Colorectal cancer survival trends in the United States from 1992 to 2018 differ among persons from five racial and ethnic groups according to stage at diagnosis: a SEER-based study. Cancer Control J Moffitt Cancer Cent 29:10732748221136440 - PMC - PubMed
-
- US Preventive Services Task Force (2021) Screening for colorectal cancer: US Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement. JAMA 325(19):1965–1977 - PubMed
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous