Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Apr 23:S0749-8063(25)00289-0.
doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2025.04.027. Online ahead of print.

Conversion to Arthroscopic Surgery for Anterior Shoulder Instability Does Not Significantly Increase Patient Out-of-Pocket Costs, But Both Conversion and Initial Arthroscopic Management Are Twice as Costly as Isolated Nonoperative Management

Affiliations

Conversion to Arthroscopic Surgery for Anterior Shoulder Instability Does Not Significantly Increase Patient Out-of-Pocket Costs, But Both Conversion and Initial Arthroscopic Management Are Twice as Costly as Isolated Nonoperative Management

Justin Tiao et al. Arthroscopy. .

Abstract

Purpose: To elucidate patient out-of-pocket costs associated with arthroscopic and nonoperative treatment of anterior shoulder instability, with a secondary aim to examine the costs of conversion from nonoperative to arthroscopic treatment within 12 months after initial shoulder instability diagnosis.

Methods: The MarketScan Commercial Claims and Encounters database was used to identify patients aged 18 to 40 years with anterior shoulder instability via diagnosis codes from 2014 to 2017. Three cohorts were created: an operative cohort, a nonoperative cohort, and an operative conversion cohort. The operative cohort was initially treated with primary arthroscopic shoulder surgery. The nonoperative cohort was treated with physical therapy. The conversion cohort was initially treated nonoperatively and then converted to operative management. Eighty-one patients with failed arthroscopic treatment were excluded. Open stabilization procedures were excluded as well. Patient out-of-pocket costs were calculated for each cohort and compared.

Results: In total, 713 operative, 1,144 nonoperative, and 79 conversion cohort patients were identified. Initial nonoperative treatment failed in approximately 6% of patients (79 of 1,223). Patients in the operative cohort were more likely to be men (percentage of male patients, 78% vs 69%; P < .001) and to be younger (median age, 21 years vs 26 years; P < .001) than those in the nonoperative cohort. Nonoperative treatment had the lowest patient out-of-pocket cost ($998 for nonoperative vs $1,961 for operative, P < .001), and conversion to operative treatment had the highest patient cost ($2,230). The additional cost of physical therapy, when nonoperative treatment fails, played a significant role in this difference.

Conclusions: Among patients presenting for evaluation of anterior shoulder instability, converting from nonoperative to arthroscopic treatment does not significantly increase patient costs compared with initial arthroscopic intervention. However, both treatment pathways are roughly 2 times more costly to the patient than isolated nonoperative management.

Clinical relevance: This study shows that nonoperative management of anterior shoulder instability is associated with the lowest patient out-of-pocket costs whereas conversion from nonoperative to arthroscopic treatment results in the highest costs. These findings highlight the financial implications of treatment selection and the potential cost burden for patients in whom initial conservative management fails.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Disclosures The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: This work was supported in part through the computational resources and staff expertise provided by Scientific Computing and Data at the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai and was supported by a Clinical and Translational Science Award (grant UL1TR004419) from the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences. J.T. reports that financial support was provided to Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai by the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences. J.K. reports that financial support was provided to Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai by the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences. A.M.R. reports that financial support was provided to Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai by the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences. K.C.W. reports that financial support was provided to Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai by the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences. B.Z.S. reports that financial support was provided to Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai by the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences. D.B. reports that financial support was provided to Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai by the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences. T.H. reports that financial support was provided to Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai by the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences. J.N.G. reports that financial support was provided to Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai by the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences; reports a consulting or advisory relationship with DePuy Synthes, Medical Device Business Solution, and Medtronic; receives travel reimbursement from DePuy Synthes, Medical Device Business Solution, and Gotham Surgical Solutions & Devices; and receives speaking and lecture fees from Gotham Surgical Solutions & Devices. S.G.A. reports that financial support was provided to Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai by the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences; reports a consulting or advisory relationship with Smith & Nephew and Miach Orthopedics; owns equity or stocks in Manhattan Surgery Center; receives speaking and lecture fees from Gotham Surgical Solutions & Devices and Arthrex; and receives travel reimbursement from Gotham Surgical Solutions & Devices and Arthrex.

Similar articles

References

    1. Frank RM, Thon SG, Tokish JM, et al. Management of Shoulder Instability in 2020: What, When, and How. Instr Course Lect. 2021;70:3–22. - PubMed
    1. Glazebrook H, Miller B, Wong I. Anterior Shoulder Instability: A Systematic Review of the Quality and Quantity of the Current Literature for Surgical Treatment. Orthop J Sports Med. 2018;6(11):2325967118805983. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Aboalata M, Plath JE, Seppel G, Juretzko J, Vogt S, Imhoff AB. Results of Arthroscopic Bankart Repair for Anterior-Inferior Shoulder Instability at 13-Year Follow-up. Am J Sports Med. 2017;45(4):782–787. - PubMed
    1. Lau BC, Hutyra CA, Gonzalez JM, et al. Surgical treatment for recurrent shoulder instability: factors influencing surgeon decision making. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2021;30(3):e85–e102. - PubMed
    1. Nattfogel EA, Ranebo MC. Patients Have a 15% Redislocation Rate After Arthroscopic Bankart Repair With a Knotless Technique. Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil. 2024;6(1):100864. - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources