Energy and carbon-efficient one-pot bioprocessing for upcycling non-sterile food waste into high-yield 2,3-butanediol production
- PMID: 40280397
- DOI: 10.1016/j.envres.2025.121673
Energy and carbon-efficient one-pot bioprocessing for upcycling non-sterile food waste into high-yield 2,3-butanediol production
Abstract
Food waste is a significant global issue whose unsatisfactory management leads to greenhouse gas emissions and loss of resources. Repurposing food waste from landfills to sustainable bioprocessing supports the circular bioeconomy. This study explores converting non-sterile food waste into 2,3-butanediol (2,3-BDO), a versatile chemical, using a one-pot bioprocessing (OPB) method which integrates enzymatic saccharification and fermentation to improve efficiency and reduce costs. Optimizing solid-to-liquid ratios (20 % w/v), inoculum sizes (10 % vol.) of Klebsiella pneumoniae strain PM2, and fermentation strategies (batch and fed-batch) maximizes yields. Fed-batch cultivation with constant feeding at 1.5 mL/h for 42 h reached a maximum titer of 78.4 g/L (85.5 % of the theoretical yield), a 33.5 % improvement over the benchmark separate hydrolysis and fermentation (SHF) process. Compositional variability of food waste (glucose r = 0.99) also greatly impacted 2,3-BDO production. Energy and carbon footprint analyses reveal that food waste biorefineries offer a significant reduction in energy consumption with a -0.86 kWh/kg-FW and carbon benefits of 1.41 kgCO2-eq./kg-FW over traditional disposal methods, reducing greenhouse gas emissions by 97.3 % compared to sugar biorefineries and promoting a circular economy. The findings underscore the potential of food waste as a sustainable feedstock for bioproducts, advocating for policy support to advance bioconversion technologies.
Keywords: 2,3-Butanediol; Food waste; GHG reduction; One-pot bioprocessing; Simultaneous saccharification and fermentation.
Copyright © 2025 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
Declaration of competing interest The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests:Duu-Jong Lee reports financial support was provided by Hong Kong STEM Professorship. Carol Sze Ki Lin reports financial support was provided by Hong Kong University Grants Committee. Duu-Jong Lee reports financial support was provided by Hong Kong Jockey Club. If there are other authors, they declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources