Open abdomen versus primary closure in the management of severe abdominal sepsis: What is the right way? Results of the last 5 years of a reference center
- PMID: 40281340
- PMCID: PMC12031820
- DOI: 10.1007/s00423-025-03693-w
Open abdomen versus primary closure in the management of severe abdominal sepsis: What is the right way? Results of the last 5 years of a reference center
Abstract
Purpose: WSES guidelines allow open abdomen (OA) for critically ill patients due to secondary peritonitis in the case of inadequate source control, but this option results quite vague and with a low grade of evidence (Grade 2 C). Moreover, the emerging increasing in literature of complications, makes the use of OA in secondary peritonitis more debated. The aim of our study is to analyze the postoperative outcomes of patients undergoing OA versus primary closure (PC) in secondary peritonitis.
Methods: We collected data from Tertiary Trauma Center from 2019 to 2024. The study included patients who underwent urgent laparotomy for severe secondary peritonitis, divided into two groups based on the strategy chosen in the index laparotomy: PC or OA. We retrospectively analyzed the data, considering as primary outcome post-operative mortality, while as secondary outcomes short terms complications and LOS.
Results: 283 patients fit the research for the diagnosis of peritonitis but only 176 were included as with a WSES-SSS > = 7. 128 patients (72,7%) were in the PC group, while 48 (27,3%) were managed with an OA strategy. There were no statistical differences in terms of mortality (p = 0.371), between the two groups. Complications were higher in the OA group (p = 0.001). From the logistic regression only MPI resulted an independent factor of mortality (p = 0.016; OR 1.080).
Conclusion: The study shows that OA in severe secondary peritonitis does not improve mortality and is associated with higher short-term complications and incisional hernias. However, RCT are necessary to better investigate the role of OA in the management of abdominal sepsis.
Keywords: Abdominal sepsis; Open abdomen; Peritonitis; Primary closure.
© 2025. The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
Declarations. Informed consent: This study does not need for an informed consent. Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests.
Figures




Similar articles
-
Outcomes of open abdomen versus primary closure following emergent laparotomy for suspected secondary peritonitis: A propensity-matched analysis.J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2019 Sep;87(3):623-629. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000002345. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2019. PMID: 31045736
-
Open abdomen versus primary closure in nontrauma patients: A weighted analysis of a single-center experience.J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2025 Mar 1;98(3):510-520. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000004488. Epub 2024 Nov 13. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2025. PMID: 40013921
-
Open or closed abdomen post laparotomy to control severe abdominal sepsis: a survival analysis.Rev Col Bras Cir. 2024 May 6;51:e20243595. doi: 10.1590/0100-6991e-20243595-en. eCollection 2024. Rev Col Bras Cir. 2024. PMID: 38716912 Free PMC article.
-
Vacuum-assisted closure or primary closure with relaparotomy on-demand in patients with secondary peritonitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.World J Emerg Surg. 2025 May 22;20(1):42. doi: 10.1186/s13017-025-00615-5. World J Emerg Surg. 2025. PMID: 40399929 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Management of abdominal sepsis--a paradigm shift?Anaesthesiol Intensive Ther. 2015;47(4):400-8. doi: 10.5603/AIT.a2015.0026. Epub 2015 May 14. Anaesthesiol Intensive Ther. 2015. PMID: 25973662 Review.
References
-
- Chiara O, Cimbanassi S, Biffl W, Leppaniemi A, Henry S, Scalea TM et al (2016) International consensus conference on open abdomen in trauma. Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery.;80:173–83 - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical