Comparative efficacy and acceptability of interventions for universal, selective and indicated prevention of eating disorders: study protocol for a systematic review and network meta-analysis
- PMID: 40281541
- PMCID: PMC12032746
- DOI: 10.1186/s40337-025-01244-8
Comparative efficacy and acceptability of interventions for universal, selective and indicated prevention of eating disorders: study protocol for a systematic review and network meta-analysis
Abstract
Background: Eating disorders (EDs) are severe psychiatric conditions, with prevalence rates ranging from 5.5 to 17.9% in women and 0.6 to 2.4% in men. EDs carry a high risk of chronicity and mortality, highlighting the need for effective prevention strategies. Primary prevention can target the entire population (universal), high-risk groups (selective), or individuals with early signs (indicated). Despite substantial research, prior reviews often show limitations, such as single-author data extraction, lack of quality assessment, reliance on endpoint data, exclusion of obesity prevention programs, or outdated findings. No review has yet evaluated the comparative effectiveness of multiple interventions across risk groups. This article outlines a systematic review and network meta-analysis (NMA) protocol to assess the comparative effectiveness of various ED preventive interventions across different prevention types and populations.
Methods: Eligible studies will include (cluster) randomized controlled trials (RCTs) involving children, adolescents, and adults across a range of settings. Databases to be searched include MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, and CENTRAL. All prevention types (universal, selective, indicated) will be included. Interventions will encompass psychological, educational, physical, and nutritional approaches aimed at preventing EDs, disordered eating, or negative body image and/or reducing risk factors. Coprimary outcomes will be ED diagnostic symptoms, overall ED pathology, ED onset, and intervention all-cause discontinuation (acceptability). A frequentist NMA framework will be used for data synthesis, with sensitivity and subgroup analyses to identify effect modifiers.
Discussion: This first NMA on ED prevention aims to provide valuable insights for clinicians, researchers, policymakers and the public by identifying the most effective interventions and highlighting research gaps. The findings will inform intervention selection for specific populations and guide future prevention strategies to reduce the burden of EDs on affected individuals, their communities, and wider society.
Clinical trial registration number: CRD42024498102.
Keywords: Anorexia nervosa; Binge-eating disorder; Bulimia nervosa; Eating disorders; Indicated; Network meta-analysis; Prevention; Selective; Systematic review; Universal.
© 2025. The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
Declarations. Ethics approval and consent to participate: This review does not require ethical approval as it will draw data from studies in which consent to participate has already been obtained. Consent for publication: Not applicable. Competing interests: There are potential conflicts of interests regarding ES and TW who each developed some of the prevention programs to be evaluated. CC has been a consultant and/or advisor to or has received honoraria from: AbbVie, Acadia, Adock Ingram, Alkermes, Allergan, Angelini, Aristo, Biogen, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Bristol-Meyers Squibb, Cardio Diagnostics, Cerevel, CNX Therapeutics, Compass Pathways, Darnitsa, Denovo, Gedeon Richter, Hikma, Holmusk, IntraCellular Therapies, Jamjoom Pharma, Janssen/J&J, Karuna, LB Pharma, Lundbeck, MedAvante-ProPhase, MedInCell, Merck, Mindpax, Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma, Mylan, Neurocrine, Neurelis, Newron, Noven, Novo Nordisk, Otsuka, Pharmabrain, PPD Biotech, Recordati, Relmada, Reviva, Rovi, Sage, Seqirus, SK Life Science, Sumitomo Pharma America, Sunovion, Sun Pharma, Supernus, Takeda, Teva, Tolmar, Vertex, and Viatris. He provided expert testimony for Janssen and Otsuka. He served on a Data Safety Monitoring Board for Compass Pathways, Denovo, Lundbeck, Relmada, Reviva, Rovi, Supernus, and Teva. He has received grant support from Janssen and Takeda. He received royalties from UpToDate and is also a stock option holder of Cardio Diagnostics, Kuleon Biosciences, LB Pharma, Mindpax, and Quantic. MH received honoraria/has been a consultant for Lundbeck and Otsuka. MS received honoraria/has been a consultant for Angelini, AbbVie, Boehringer Ingelheim, Lundbeck, Otsuka. All other authors declare that they have no known conflicts of interest.
References
-
- Treasure J, Duarte TA, Schmidt U. Eating disorders. Lancet. 2020;395(10227):899–911. - PubMed
-
- Silén Y, Keski-Rahkonen A. Worldwide prevalence of DSM-5 eating disorders among young people. Curr Opin Psychiatry. 2022;35(6):362–71. - PubMed
-
- World Health Organization. Health promotion and disease prevention through population-based interventions, including action to address social determinants and health inequity 2023. Available from: https://www.emro.who.int/about-who/public-health-functions/health-promot...
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources