Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Mar 21;15(4):400.
doi: 10.3390/bs15040400.

Variability and Belief in Karma: Perceived Life Variability Polarizes Perceptions of Behavior-Outcome Valence Consistency

Liying Jiao  1 , Zhen Guo  2 , Jinzhe Zhao  3 , Yan Xu  3
Affiliations

Variability and Belief in Karma: Perceived Life Variability Polarizes Perceptions of Behavior-Outcome Valence Consistency

Liying Jiao et al. Behav Sci (Basel). .

Abstract

This article explores people's karma belief on the subjective probabilities of future chance events and how perceived life variability influences the expectations of behavior-outcome relationships through three studies. Study 1 used two experiments (Study 1a and 1b) and found that individuals believed that there is a causal association between moral actions and future experiences. People tended to make karmic forecasts that predicted a luckier future (reflected in probability judgments of lucky and unfortunate chance events) for a person who behaved morally than for one who behaved immorally. Finally, we found that individuals rely more heavily on belief in karma (i.e., stronger beliefs about the valence consistency of behaviors and outcomes) when they perceive greater life variability in their lives (Study 2), suggesting that the perceived life variability is a factor in using karma to make predictions.

Keywords: future experiences; karma; moral behavior; perceived life variability.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

No conflicts of interest exist in the submission of this manuscript.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
The effect of the source of a person’s morality on subjective probability judgments for good luck events, Studies 1a and 1b.
Figure 2
Figure 2
The moderating effect of perceived life variability in the relationship between moral actions and future luck experiences, Study 2.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Adam-Troian J., Chayinska M., Paladino M. P., Uluğ Ö. M., Vaes J., Wagner-Egger P. Of precarity and conspiracy: Introducing a socio-functional model of conspiracy beliefs. British Journal of Social Psychology. 2023;62((S1)):136–159. doi: 10.1111/bjso.12597. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Allen P. M., Edwards J. A., McCullough W. Does karma exist?: Buddhism, social cognition, and the evidence for karma. International Journal for the Psychology of Religion. 2015;25(1):1–17. doi: 10.1080/10508619.2013.879427. - DOI
    1. Banerjee K., Bloom P. You get what you give: Children’s karmic bargaining. Developmental Science. 2017;20(5):e12442. doi: 10.1111/desc.12442. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Broadway B., Haisken-DeNew J. P. Keep calm and consume? Subjective uncertainty and precautionary savings. Journal of Economics and Finance. 2019;43(3):481–505. doi: 10.1007/s12197-018-9451-0. - DOI
    1. Brown O., Hammill A., McLeman R. Climate change as the “new” security threat: Implications for Africa. International Affairs. 2007;83(6):1141–1154. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2346.2007.00678.x. - DOI

LinkOut - more resources