Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2025 Apr 8;17(8):1256.
doi: 10.3390/cancers17081256.

Metastasis-Directed Therapy in Oligometastatic Prostate Cancer: Biological Rationale and Systematic Review of Published Data

Affiliations
Review

Metastasis-Directed Therapy in Oligometastatic Prostate Cancer: Biological Rationale and Systematic Review of Published Data

Francesco Fiorica et al. Cancers (Basel). .

Abstract

Introduction: Metastasis-directed therapy (MDT) alone may be effective in preventing disease progression and positively affecting overall survival (OS) in oligometastatic prostate cancer (OMPC).

Objective: We systematically reviewed the current literature to analyse the biological rationale for integrating MDT into treatment strategies for OMPC and investigate the current evidence on its role in OMPC.

Evidence acquisition: MEDLINE/PUBMED and the EMBASE Database were systematically searched to identify eligible reports published up to January 2024. The proceedings of the European Society for Radiotherapy and Oncology, European Society of Medical Oncology, American Society for Radiation Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology, European Uro-Oncology Group, and American Urological Association annual meetings were analysed.

Results: Eighteen studies published between 2014 and 2024 were selected for the analysis. The studies included 1058 patients treated with metastasis-directed radiotherapy. No statistically significant differences were found in terms of treatment-escalation-free survival between hormone-naïve patients treated with MDT alone and those treated with MDT and hormonal manipulation. By contrast, the combination treatment significantly increased both 2 year and 4 year disease-progression-free survival (DPFS) rates (p-values < 0.00001 and 0.006, respectively). In patients with castration-sensitive disease treated with MDT alone, the estimated 2 year and 4 year OS rates were 96.4% (95% confidence interval [CI], 92.9-100%) and 89.1% (95% CI, 82.3-96.5%), respectively. The estimated 2 year and 4 year overall survival rates in the combination treatment group were 86.1% (95% CI 79.2-93.7%) and 74.8% (95% CI 64.6.3-86.5%), respectively.

Conclusions: MDT alone is associated with promising outcomes in OMPC and represents a valuable, valid, and often preferable strategy. Combined with ADT improves significantly disease-progression-free survival, but its impact on overall survival remains uncertain. Given these findings, the decision to incorporate ADT should be tailored to individual patient characteristics and clinical context. Future research should integrate biomarker-based approaches to optimise MDT use and select the best candidates for a multimodal approach.

Keywords: Metastasis-Directed Therapy (MDT); Oligometastatic Prostate Cancer (OMPC); multimodal approach prostate cancer.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have no relevant affiliations or financial involvement with any organisation or entity with a financial interest in or financial conflict with the subject matter or materials discussed in the manuscript. This includes employment, consultancies, honoraria, stock ownership or options, expert testimony, grants, or patents received or pending, or royalties.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Study flow chart.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Treatment-escalation-free survival rates in (a) patients treated with MDT alone, (b) patients with castration-sensitive disease treated with MDT and androgen-suppression therapy, and (c) patients with castration-resistant disease.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Overall survival in (a) all patients treated with MDT, (b) patients with castration-sensitive disease, and (c) patients with castration-resistant disease.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Disease-progression-free survival in (a) all patients treated with MDT, (b) patients with castration-sensitive disease, and (c) patients with castration-resistant disease.

References

    1. Surcel C., Kretschmer A., Mirvald C., Sinescu I., Heidegger I., Tsaur I. Molecular Mechanisms Related with Oligometastatic Prostate Cancer—Is It Just a Matter of Numbers? Cancers. 2022;14:766. doi: 10.3390/cancers14030766. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Deek M.P., Tran P.T. Oligometastatic and Oligoprogression Disease and Local Therapies in Prostate Cancer. Cancer J. 2020;26:137–143. doi: 10.1097/PPO.0000000000000432. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kucharczyk M.J., Gravis G., Niazi T. The Biology of Oligometastatic Prostate Cancer: A Different Beast than Polymetastatic Prostate Cancer. Eur. Urol. Focus. 2019;5:117–118. doi: 10.1016/j.euf.2018.11.011. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Sridharan S., Steigler A., Spry N.A., Joseph D., Lamb D.S., Matthews J.H., Atkinson C., Tai K.-H., Duchesne G., Christie D., et al. Oligometastatic Bone Disease in Prostate Cancer Patients Treated on the TROG 03.04 RADAR Trial. Radiother. Oncol. 2016;121:98–102. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2016.07.021. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Juan G.R., Laura F.H., Javier P.V., Natalia V.C., Ma Isabel G.R., Enrique R.G., José Luis S.P., Pablo A.L., Noelia S.S., Roser V.D., et al. Where Do We Stand in the Management of Oligometastatic Prostate Cancer? A Comprehensive Review. Cancers. 2022;14:2017. doi: 10.3390/cancers14082017. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources