Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Mar 22;61(4):563.
doi: 10.3390/medicina61040563.

Incidence and Prognostic Significance of Hormonal Receptors and HER2 Status Conversion in Recurrent Breast Cancer: A Retrospective Study in a Single Institute

Affiliations

Incidence and Prognostic Significance of Hormonal Receptors and HER2 Status Conversion in Recurrent Breast Cancer: A Retrospective Study in a Single Institute

Einas M Yousef et al. Medicina (Kaunas). .

Abstract

Background and Objectives: Changes in biomarker status are not rare and usually occur in an unfavorable direction. Evaluating changes in biomarker status is advantageous for assessing treatment options and prognosticating patients. Currently, only a few studies have explored the association between biomarker conversion and breast cancer relapse. In this study, we sought to determine the incidence of receptor conversions in patients diagnosed with recurrent breast cancer in comparison to their corresponding primary tumors and to evaluate possible influencing factors. Moreover, we aimed to assess the prognostic significance of biomarker conversion, if any was detected, in breast cancer patients. Materials and Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted among breast cancer patients treated at King Khalid University Hospital, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. Data were collected from recurrent breast cancer patients about different parameters to assess the incidence of hormonal receptors and human epidermal growth factor 2 (HER2) status conversion between primary and recurrent tumors. The calculation of progression-free survival (PFS)/ relapse-free survival (RFS) and the overall survival (OS) was conducted to assess the prognostic value of the assessed biomarker conversion. Results: Progesterone receptor (PR) conversion had the highest incidence (29.9%), followed by HER2 (23%) and estrogen receptor (ER) (12.6%). Menopausal status and concurrent receptor conversion were significant factors influencing receptor status changes. However, no significant associations were found between receptor conversion and other clinical factors, including tumor stage and histological subtype. The survival analysis revealed no statistically significant differences in OS or RFS between patients with and without receptor conversion. Conclusions: Receptor conversion, particularly for PR and HER2, is common in recurrent breast cancer, emphasizing the importance of re-biopsy at recurrence to ensure accurate treatment decisions. While receptor conversion does not significantly impact survival outcomes in this cohort, further large-scale prospective studies are warranted to validate these findings and explore their clinical implications in breast cancer management.

Keywords: HER2 status; breast cancer; estrogen receptor; progesterone receptor; prognostic significance; receptor conversion; survival analysis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Pie charts represent the percentage of hormonal receptor and HER2 status conversion in this study’s participants. (A) Estrogen receptor (ER), (B) progesterone receptor (PR), (C) human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Kaplan–Meier curves showing OS based on receptor conversion status for (A) estrogen receptor (ER), (B) progesterone receptor (PR), and (C) human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2). The x-axis represents time, while the y-axis shows cumulative survival probability, ranging from 1 (100%) at the start of the study (when all patients are alive) to 0 (0%) when all patients have experienced death.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Kaplan–Meier curves showing RFS based on receptor conversion status for (A) estrogen receptor (ER), (B) progesterone receptor (PR), and (C) human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2).

Similar articles

References

    1. Siegel R.L., Miller K.D., Wagle N.S., Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2023. CA Cancer J. Clin. 2023;73:17–48. doi: 10.3322/caac.21763. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Testa U., Castelli G., Pelosi E. Breast Cancer: A Molecularly Heterogenous Disease Needing Subtype-Specific Treatments. Med. Sci. 2020;8:18. doi: 10.3390/medsci8010018. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Vemuru S., Huang J., Colborn K., Yoon Y., Huynh V., Leonard L., Ahrendt G., Christian N., Afghahi A., McLemore L., et al. Clinical implications of receptor conversions in breast cancer patients who have undergone neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Breast Cancer Res. Treat. 2023;200:247–256. doi: 10.1007/s10549-023-06978-0. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. De La Cruz L.M., Harhay M.O., Zhang P., Ugras S. Impact of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy on Breast Cancer Subtype: Does Subtype Change and, if so, How?: IHC Profile and Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy. Ann. Surg. Oncol. 2018;25:3535–3540. doi: 10.1245/s10434-018-6608-1. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Li C., Fan H., Xiang Q., Xu L., Zhang Z., Liu Q., Zhang T., Ling J., Zhou Y., Zhao X., et al. Prognostic value of receptor status conversion following neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Breast Cancer Res. Treat. 2019;178:497–504. doi: 10.1007/s10549-019-05421-7. - DOI - PubMed

MeSH terms