Combination of Individual Tests to Improve Diagnostic Accuracy in Chlamydia trachomatis Detection
- PMID: 40283005
- PMCID: PMC12028708
- DOI: 10.3390/medicina61040714
Combination of Individual Tests to Improve Diagnostic Accuracy in Chlamydia trachomatis Detection
Abstract
Background and Objectives: Chlamydial infection is the most common asymptomatic infection worldwide. Despite all national programs, strategies and guidelines, chlamydial infection is still the leading infection worldwide, especially in young populations. We have tried to summarize the best diagnostic tools for its detection. Materials and Methods: In the study, 225 sexually active patients who were tested for chlamydial infection at the Institute of Public Health Kragujevac participated. Results: Combinations of direct immunofluorescence (DIF) and a rapid lateral immunochromatographic test (RT) and combinations of an RT and immunoglobulin G (IgG) do not improve diagnostic efficiency when compared to a rapid test that individually had the best parameters. In situations that require high specificity, the recommended combination is RT/IgA, which as a highly specific test has few false positive results, while the combinations of DIF + RT and RT + IgG, although showing a specificity of 100%, have low sensitivity (33.30%), due to which we prefer the RT/IgA combination. The combinations DIF + RT, DIF + RT + IgG and RT + IgG, although with low sensitivity, have the highest values of specificity, and the positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) show the highest values of the extended Youden index of 130.30% and the highest values of total diagnostic accuracy of 97.00%. Based on the results of the extended Youden index, taking into account PPV and NPV, the RT/IgA combination shows the highest value of 94.60%, as well as the highest value of total diagnostic accuracy of 93.00%. Conclusions: "Two or more positive tests" or "any test positive" did not improve the diagnostic efficiency compared to a single "rapid test".
Keywords: Chlamydia trachomatis; combination of tests; diagnostic accuracy; efficiency; single test.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Chlamydia trachomatis screening in resource-limited countries - Comparison of diagnostic accuracy of 3 different assays.J Infect Dev Ctries. 2018 Sep 30;12(9):733-740. doi: 10.3855/jidc.10442. J Infect Dev Ctries. 2018. PMID: 31999631
-
Comparison of the Mikrogen multi-target ELISA with the Mikrogen recomLine immunoblot for the detection of Chlamydia trachomatis IgG antibodies in serum in infertile women.J Microbiol Methods. 2018 Jul;150:5-8. doi: 10.1016/j.mimet.2018.05.006. Epub 2018 May 7. J Microbiol Methods. 2018. PMID: 29746924
-
Interpretation of Chlamydia trachomatis antibody response in chlamydial oculogenital infection.Genitourin Med. 1995 Apr;71(2):94-7. doi: 10.1136/sti.71.2.94. Genitourin Med. 1995. PMID: 7744422 Free PMC article.
-
Rapid point of care test for detecting urogenital Chlamydia trachomatis infection in nonpregnant women and men at reproductive age.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Jan 29;1(1):CD011708. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011708.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020. PMID: 31995238 Free PMC article.
-
[Serologic diagnosis of chlamydial and Mycoplasma pneumoniae infections].Ann Biol Clin (Paris). 2006 Sep-Oct;64(5):409-19. Ann Biol Clin (Paris). 2006. PMID: 17040871 Review. French.
References
-
- Kreisel K.M., Spicknall I.H., Gargano J.W., Lewis F.M., Lewis R.M., Markowitz L.E., Roberts H., Satcher Johnson A., Song R., St Cyr S.B., et al. Sexually transmitted infections among US women and men: Prevalence and incidence estimates. Sex. Transm. Dis. 2021;48:208–214. doi: 10.1097/OLQ.0000000000001355. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- CDC . Sexually Transmitted Disease Surveillance. Department of Health and Human Services; Atlanta, GA, USA: 2021. pp. 21–41.
-
- European Centre for Disease Prevention Control . Annual Epidemiological Report for 2020 [Internet] ECDC; Solna, Sweden: 2020. Introduction to the Annual Epidemiological Report.
-
- European Centre for Disease Prevention Control . Chlamydia Control in Europe—A Survey of Member States Stockholm. ECDC; Solna, Sweden: 2014.
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous