Tubeless Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy in the Barts 'Flank-Free' Modified Supine Position with 24-Hour Discharge: A Single-Center Experience
- PMID: 40283039
- PMCID: PMC12028707
- DOI: 10.3390/medicina61040748
Tubeless Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy in the Barts 'Flank-Free' Modified Supine Position with 24-Hour Discharge: A Single-Center Experience
Abstract
Background and Objectives: To evaluate the effectiveness and outcomes of supine percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) using the Barts 'flank-free' position and ultrasound-guided puncture, assessing the feasibility of the tubeless technique for discharge within 24 h. Materials and Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of 208 patients across 220 renal units who underwent supine PCNL at a tertiary university hospital between May 2019 and December 2024. All procedures were performed by a single surgeon. Patient demographics, stone characteristics, and surgical outcomes were analyzed. The tubeless technique was applied in most cases, and outcomes were assessed in terms of operative time, complication rates, stone-free rates (SFRs), and length of hospital stay. Results: The mean operating time was 50.34 ± 30.80 min. Single-tract PCNL was performed in 94.55% of cases, with the tubeless technique used in 90% of patients. The overall complication rate was 9.55%, with no Clavien-Dindo grade IV-V complications observed. On the first postoperative day, 68.18% of patients were discharged, demonstrating 24 h discharge feasibility. SFR and complication rates aligned with existing literature. Conclusions: The Barts 'flank-free' position and ultrasound-guided puncture considerably improved surgical access and safety in supine PCNL. The tubeless technique facilitates faster recovery, making early discharge feasible, even with standard sheath sizes. Further research is warranted to validate these findings and optimize renal stone management outcomes.
Keywords: Barts position; ECIRS; PCNL; supine; tubeless; urolithiasis.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Figures




Similar articles
-
One-Shot Dilatation vs Metal Dilator During Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy in Flank-Free Supine Position: A Randomized Controlled Study.J Endourol. 2022 Jun;36(6):727-733. doi: 10.1089/end.2021.0378. J Endourol. 2022. PMID: 34969263 Clinical Trial.
-
Prone versus Barts “flank-free” modified supine percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a match-pair analysis.Turk J Med Sci. 2021 Jun 28;51(3):1373-1379. doi: 10.3906/sag-2011-21. Turk J Med Sci. 2021. PMID: 33550764 Free PMC article.
-
Minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy vs standard PCNL for management of renal stones in the flank-free modified supine position: single-center experience.Urolithiasis. 2017 Dec;45(6):585-589. doi: 10.1007/s00240-017-0966-1. Epub 2017 Feb 22. Urolithiasis. 2017. PMID: 28229197
-
Barts flank-free modified supine position vs prone position in percutaneous nephrolithotomy: Systematic review and meta analysis.Arch Ital Urol Androl. 2024 Oct 29;96(4):12944. doi: 10.4081/aiua.2024.12944. Arch Ital Urol Androl. 2024. PMID: 39692421
-
Supine tubeless PCNL in horseshoe kidney (a series of cases).Urologia. 2022 Nov;89(4):559-563. doi: 10.1177/03915603211015546. Epub 2021 May 19. Urologia. 2022. PMID: 34006150 Review.
References
-
- de la Rosette J., Assimos D., Desai M., Gutierrez J., Lingeman J., Scarpa R., Tefekli A., Croes PCNL Study Group The Clinical Research Office of the Endourological Society Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy Global Study: Indications, Complications, and Outcomes in 5803 Patients. J. Endourol. 2011;25:11–17. doi: 10.1089/end.2010.0424. - DOI - PubMed
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources