Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Apr 9;14(8):2581.
doi: 10.3390/jcm14082581.

Morphometric Measurements Prior to Totally Endoscopic Mitral Valve Repair: Technical and Educational Aspects

Affiliations

Morphometric Measurements Prior to Totally Endoscopic Mitral Valve Repair: Technical and Educational Aspects

Marie-Elisabeth Stelzmueller et al. J Clin Med. .

Abstract

Objective: The totally endoscopic approach is on the rise to become the new standard in mitral valve surgery. The aim of this study was to develop a morphometric measurement tool for educational purposes to predict operability with low conversion and high repair rates. Methods: From January 2020 to March 2023, 64 patients underwent totally endoscopic mitral valve repair (TE-MVR). Of these, 15 patients were deemed to be unsuitable for TE-MVR due to narrow space and/or anticipated complex repair techniques and underwent repair through sternotomy (MVR-open). Angio-CT scanning was performed for preoperative planning and measurements of the following: the distance between the sternum and the spine (DSS), the distance between the skin incision and the anterior anulus of the mitral valve (DNM) and the intercostal space at the level of the skin incision (ICS). Results: The repair rate for all patients was 98.7%. In the TE-MVR group, the conversion rate to sternotomy was 3.1%. The 30-day survival was 100%. The DSS was 130.4 ± 18.8 mm and 108.1 ± 17.3 mm, and the DSM 70.7 ± 12.1 mm and 58.5 ± 13.6 mm in the TE-MVR and MVR-open, respectively (p < 0.001). Twenty-one TE-MVR patients were found to be technically demanding due to friction and less freedom to move the instruments. The composite morphometric parameter DSS plus 4xICS minus DNM was 53.3, 39.8 and 25.6 for TE-TMReasy, TE-TMRdemanding and MVR-open, respectively (p < 0.05 and p < 0.01). Conclusions: Surgical skills and a long history of expertise are mandatory to achieve excellent results with a low conversion and high repair rate. The composite morphometric parameter may be an easy tool for educational demands to predict the ease and feasibility of TE-MVR.

Keywords: computed tomography; minimally invasive; mitral valve repair; totally endoscopic.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Measurements. DSS–Distance between the sternum and the spine: yellow. DSM–Distance between the sternum and the anterior annulus (A2) of the mitral valve: orange. DNM–Distance between the nipple and the anterior mitral anulus: green. DVM–Distance to the left between the vertical and the anterior mitral anulus (DVM): dark blue. AMH–Angle between the mitral valve and the horizontal: light blue. ANM–Angle between the mitral plane and the line from the working port to the mitral valve: magenta.
Figure 2
Figure 2
DSA–Distance between the sternum and aorta: yellow.
Figure 3
Figure 3
ICS–Width of the intercostal space: yellow. The red, green, and blue lines represent the orthogonal planes generated by the Multi-Planar Re-construction (MPR) plugin, facilitating three-dimensional assessment of the CT dataset.

Similar articles

References

    1. Lange R., Voss B., Kehl V., Mazzitelli D., Tassani-Prell P., Günther T. Right Minithoracotomy Versus Full Sternotomy for Mitral Valve Repair: A Propensity Matched Comparison. Ann. Thorac. Surg. 2017;103:573–579. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2016.06.055. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Al Otaibi A., Gupta S., Belley-Cote E.P., Alsagheir A., Spence J., Parry D., Whitlock R.P. Mini-thoracotomy vs. conventional sternotomy mitral valve surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J. Cardiovasc. Surg. 2017;58:489–496. doi: 10.23736/S0021-9509.16.09603-8. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Grant S.W., Hickey G.L., Modi P., Hunter S., Akowuah E., Zacharias J. Propensity-matched analysis of minimally invasive approach versus sternotomy for mitral valve surgery. Heart. 2019;105:783–789. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2018-314049. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Cao C., Wolfenden H., Liou K., Pathan F., Gupta S., Nienaber T.A., Chandrakumar D., Indraratna P., Yan T.D. A meta-analysis of robotic vs. conventional mitral valve surgery. Ann. Cardiothorac. Surg. 2015;4:305–314. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Stelzmueller M.-E., Zilberszac R., Rosenhek R., Hutschala D., Kappel S., Lassnig A., Laufer G., Zimpfer D., Wisser W. Pushing boundaries in cardiac surgery: Minimally invasive mitral valve repair combined with tricuspid valve repair and/or other concomitant procedures. Front. Cardiovasc. Med. 2024;11:1407591. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2024.1407591. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources