Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Apr 11;14(8):2645.
doi: 10.3390/jcm14082645.

Poor Mental Health Status as a Risk Factor and Prognosticator in SMuRF-Less Acute Myocardial Infarction

Affiliations

Poor Mental Health Status as a Risk Factor and Prognosticator in SMuRF-Less Acute Myocardial Infarction

Dimitrios V Moysidis et al. J Clin Med. .

Abstract

Background: The etiology of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) in patients without history of standard modifiable risk factors (SMuRFs) remains unclear. Simultaneously, evidence suggests that mental health status (MHS) contributes to the pathogenesis of AMI and worsens its outcomes. Methods: This analysis of the prospective "Beyond-SMuRFs" (NCT05535582) study included 650 consecutive patients with AMI who had available data on self-reported MHS before AMI, calculated by the SF36-Questionnaire mental component summary (MCS). Poor MHS was defined as MCS ≤ 50. Multivariable logistic-regression and Cox-regression analyses were implemented to investigate poor MHS as a potential predictor of SMuRF-less AMIs and compare all-cause mortality based on SMuRF-less and MH status, respectively. Results: Of 650 patients with AMI (mean age 62.6 ± 12.1 years), 288 (44.3%) had MCS ≤ 50 and 128 (19.7%) were SMuRF-less patients. Three out of four SMuRF-less patients reported an MCS ≤ 50 (n = 96, 75%), a significantly higher percentage than the corresponding percentage in patients with SMuRFs (n = 192, 36.8%; p < 0.01). The multivariable logistic regression model showed that MCS ≤ 50 was an independent predictor of SMuRF-less AMI [aOR = 0.95; 95% CI (0.94-0.96)]. Time-to-event analysis for all-cause mortality showed that patients with MCS > 50 had lower mortality rates than those with poor MHS (aHR, 3.61 [95% CI, 2.02 to 6.43], p < 0.01). Higher risk for all-cause mortality was also observed in SMuRF-less patients with poor MHS compared to patients with at least one SMuRF and good MHS [aHR, 4.52 (95% CI, 0.94-21.73)]. Conclusions: Poor MHS was an independent predictor of the occurrence of SMuRF-less AMI and predictive of higher mortality in patients with and without SMuRFs.

Keywords: acute myocardial infarction; coronary artery disease; mental component summary; mental health status; standard modifiable risk factors.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Graphical illustration of the SF-36 items included in MCS.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Correlation between the self-reported mental health status score (x axis) before AMI and the adjusted odds ratio (95% CI) for the probability of SMuRF-less AMI (y axis). The color scale corresponds to a gradual reduction in self-reported MCS scoring (from blue to red). These spline curves represent the adjusted odds ratios for the probability of a patient presenting with AMI being SMuRF-less depending on self-reported MCS. The edges of the darker area display 95% confidence intervals (CIs).
Figure 3
Figure 3
Time-to-event analysis for all-cause mortality in each SF-36 MCS subgroup.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Time-to-event analysis for all-cause mortality according to SMuRF-less and mental status.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Potential pathophysiological mechanisms of mental-stress-induced myocardial infarction.

References

    1. Roth G.A., Mensah G.A., Johnson C.O., Addolorato G., Ammirati E., Baddour L.M., Barengo N.C., Beaton A.Z., Benjamin E.J., Benziger C.P., et al. Global Burden of Cardiovascular Diseases and Risk Factors, 1990–2019. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2020;76:2982–3021. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2020.11.010. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Visseren F.L.J., Mach F., Smulders Y.M., Carballo D., Koskinas K.C., Bäck M., Benetos A., Biffi A., Boavida J.-M., Capodanno D., et al. 2021 ESC Guidelines on cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practice. Eur. Heart J. 2021;42:3227–3337. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehab484. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Vernon S.T., Coffey S., Bhindi R., Soo Hoo S.Y., Nelson G.I., Ward M.R., Hansen P.S., Asrress K.N., Chow C.K., Celermajer D.S., et al. Increasing proportion of ST elevation myocardial infarction patients with coronary atherosclerosis poorly explained by standard modifiable risk factors. Eur. J. Prev. Cardiol. 2017;24:1824–1830. doi: 10.1177/2047487317720287. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Vernon S.T., Coffey S., D’Souza M., Chow C.K., Kilian J., Hyun K., Shaw J.A., Adams M., Roberts-Thomson P., Brieger D., et al. ST-Segment–Elevation Myocardial Infarction (STEMI) Patients Without Standard Modifiable Cardiovascular Risk Factors—How Common Are They, and What Are Their Outcomes? J. Am. Heart Assoc. 2019;8:e013296. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.119.013296. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Papazoglou A.S., Farmakis I.T., Zafeiropoulos S., Moysidis D v Karagiannidis E., Stalikas N., Kartas A., Stamos K., Sofidis G., Doundoulakis I., Giannopoulos G., et al. Angiographic severity in acute coronary syndrome patients with and without standard modifiable risk factors. Front. Cardiovasc. Med. 2022;9:934946. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.934946. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources