Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Apr 15;14(8):2694.
doi: 10.3390/jcm14082694.

Characterization of Individuals with High-Frequency Artificial Tear Supplement Use

Affiliations

Characterization of Individuals with High-Frequency Artificial Tear Supplement Use

Wan-Lin Wu et al. J Clin Med. .

Abstract

Objectives: We aimed to investigate dry eye parameters as potential predisposing factors and estimate the prevalence of high-frequency topical eye drop usage. Methods: A total of 5594 dry eye patients treated between November 2015 and June 2022 were included. High users (n = 180) were those who applied at least one artificial tear drop per hour, whereas those who used artificial tears fewer than four times daily were classified as low users (n = 5414). Differences in self-reported symptoms (OSDI, SPEED questionnaires) and tear-related parameters, including severity of corneal staining (SPK), fluorescein tear-film break-up time (FTBUT), lipid layer thickness (LLT), number of expressible meibomian glands (MGE), meiboscale, and blink patterns, were assessed. Subsequent follow-up comprehensive dry eye assessments were performed at 3 months. Results: There was no difference in age or sex between high users and low users (p = 0.075 and 0.508, respectively). High users had significantly higher symptom scores (p < 0.001), more total blinks (p = 0.001), lower Schirmer scores (p < 0.001), higher SPK grades (p < 0.001), shorter FTBUT (p = 0.010), and higher limbal redness scores (p = 0.002). However, there were no differences in the LLT, MGE, or meiboscale. The compliance with follow-up examinations at 3 months was significantly greater for the high users (p < 0.001). Patients with OSDI scores > 40, SPEED scores > 12, Schirmer scores ≤ 3 mm, and higher compliance with follow-up examinations had odds ratios of 4.0, 3.3, 1.7, and 4.1, respectively, for being high users (95% confidence intervals = 2.8-5.8, 2.4-4.7, 1.2-2.3 and 2.7-5.2, respectively). Among the high users, reducing topical drops significantly decreased the SPEED and OSDI scores, except for the environmental trigger factor in the OSDI questionnaire. During long-term follow-up, 1.1% of low users and 15.4% of high users received cyclosporine treatment (odds ratio 16.4, p < 0.001). Conclusions: OSDI scores > 40, SPEED scores > 12, and Schirmer scores ≤ 3 mm were associated with high-frequency eye drop usage, which accounted for 3.2% of moderate to severe dry eye patients. Susceptibility to environmental triggers could represent hyperalgesia/allodynia in high users. High users have a higher need for cyclosporine treatment.

Keywords: OSDI; SPEED; Schirmer score; dry eye disease; high-frequency eye drop usage.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Patient inclusion/exclusion flow chart.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Comparison of baseline characteristics between high users (n = 180) and low users (n = 5414). LLT: average lipid layer thickness; MGE: number of expressible meibomian gland expression; FTBUT: fluorescein tear-film break-up time; SPK: superficial punctate keratitis. p: statistical significance examined by the Mann–Whitney U test. *: extreme outliers, more than three times the IQR away from the quartiles; 。: mild outliers, between 1.5 and 3 times the IQR away from the quartiles.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Distribution of dry eye subtypes of high users and low users. (A) There were significantly more Type 3 and 4 patients in the high-user group (chi-square p = 0.002). (B) The compliance rate was significantly higher in high users (chi-square test p < 0.001). LU: low user; HU: high user.
Figure 4
Figure 4
(A) Low users (n = 1123). Comparison of dry eye parameters between the 2 examinations of low users (A) and high users (B). (B) High users (n = 99). LLT: average lipid layer thickness; MGE: number of expressible meibomian gland expression; FTBUT: fluorescein tear-film break-up time; SPK: superficial punctate keratitis. *: extreme outliers, more than three times the IQR away from the quartiles; 。: mild outliers, between 1.5 and 3 times the IQR away from the quartiles.
Figure 4
Figure 4
(A) Low users (n = 1123). Comparison of dry eye parameters between the 2 examinations of low users (A) and high users (B). (B) High users (n = 99). LLT: average lipid layer thickness; MGE: number of expressible meibomian gland expression; FTBUT: fluorescein tear-film break-up time; SPK: superficial punctate keratitis. *: extreme outliers, more than three times the IQR away from the quartiles; 。: mild outliers, between 1.5 and 3 times the IQR away from the quartiles.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Comparison of age at the time of cyclosporine eligibility (A), time to cyclosporine eligibility (B), and sex distribution (C).

Similar articles

References

    1. Tsubota K., Yokoi N., Watanabe H., Dogru M., Kojima T., Yamada M., Kinoshita S., Kim H.M., Tchah H.W., Hyon J.Y., et al. A New Perspective on Dry Eye Classification: Proposal by the Asia Dry Eye Society. Eye Contact Lens. 2020;46((Suppl. S1)):S2–S13. doi: 10.1097/ICL.0000000000000643. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Morthen M.K., Magno M.S., Utheim T.P., Hammond C.J., Vehof J. The work-related burden of dry eye. Ocul. Surf. 2023;28:30–36. doi: 10.1016/j.jtos.2023.01.006. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Scher C., Meador L., Van Cleave J.H., Reid M.C. Moving Beyond Pain as the Fifth Vital Sign and Patient Satisfaction Scores to Improve Pain Care in the 21st Century. Pain. Manag. Nurs. 2018;19:125–129. doi: 10.1016/j.pmn.2017.10.010. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Puja G., Sonkodi B., Bardoni R. Mechanisms of Peripheral and Central Pain Sensitization: Focus on Ocular Pain. Front. Pharmacol. 2021;12:764396. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2021.764396. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Galor A., Moein H.R., Lee C., Rodriguez A., Felix E.R., Sarantopoulos K.D., Levitt R.C. Neuropathic pain and dry eye. Ocul. Surf. 2018;16:31–44. doi: 10.1016/j.jtos.2017.10.001. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources