Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Apr 11;17(8):1333.
doi: 10.3390/nu17081333.

Lifestyle Modification in Prediabetes and Diabetes: A Large Population Analysis

Affiliations

Lifestyle Modification in Prediabetes and Diabetes: A Large Population Analysis

Michael L Dansinger et al. Nutrients. .

Abstract

Background/Aims: Diabetes mellitus is a major cause of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD). We examined a large population and tested the efficacy of a voluntary lifestyle program in prediabetic and diabetic subjects. Methods: Of 133,764 subjects, 56.3% were healthy, 36.2% were prediabetic, and 7.5% were diabetic. Fasting serum measurements of glucose, insulin, adiponectin, glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c), high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP), glycated serum protein (GSP), fibrinogen, myeloperoxidase (MPO), lipoprotein-associated phospholipase A2 (LpPLA2), as well as standard lipids, direct low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), and small dense LDL-C (sdLDL-C) were performed using standard automated assays. Follow-up sampling at 6-12 months occurred in 20.1% of the prediabetic and 22.2% of the diabetic subjects; of these, 12.2% of the prediabetic and 9.7% of the diabetic subjects participated in a voluntary, real-world, digital dietitian-directed lifestyle-modification program with a 10-year diabetes risk being calculated using a biochemical model (Framingham). Results: Prediabetic and diabetic subjects had significantly elevated triglycerides, sdLDL-C, and hs-CRP and decreased HDL-C. They were insulin resistant as compared to healthy subjects, but only diabetics had significant reductions in insulin production. Lifestyle modification significantly reduced diabetes risk by 45.6% in prediabetics and significantly increased (2.4-fold) the percentage of diabetics that were in remission at follow-up (8.2% versus 3.4%) with increased weight loss (6.5 versus 2.0 pounds). Lifestyle intervention resulted in significant favorable effects on many metabolic markers. Conclusions: The measurement of fasting glucose and insulin is essential for the detection of decreased insulin production in diabetics. A digital lifestyle program can have favorable effects on ASCVD risk factors and diabetic status.

Keywords: ASCVD risk; HOMAIR; diabetes; fasting glucose; insulin; lifestyle; prediabetes.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

M.R.D. is an employee of Boston Heart Diagnostics, Framingham, MA, USA. All other authors are former employees of Boston Heart Diagnostics but have no competing interests to declare.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Insulin production and insulin sensitivity in healthy, prediabetic, and diabetic subjects. In this figure we have plotted data for the entire population of 133,764 subjects (56.3% healthy, 36.2% prediabetic, and 7.5% diabetic). Homeostasis assessment model assessment of insulin production, or HOMAβ, was calculated as equal to [360 × fasting insulin (µU/mL)]/[fasting plasma glucose (mg/dL) − 63] as previously described and plotted on the horizontal axis (22). The homeostasis model of insulin resistance, or HOMAIR, was calculated as equal to [fasting insulin (µU/mL)] × [fasting plasma glucose (mg/dL)]/405 as previously described [22]. We then plotted the reciprocal of this value multiplied by 100, or as [(1/HOMAIR) × 100], for the same subjects as a measure of insulin sensitivity (HOMAS). What can be clearly seen on the graph is that diabetic subjects not infrequently have HOMAβ of <60 (the 25th percentile value in healthy subjects), as well as decreased insulin sensitivity as compared to healthy and prediabetic subjects, with clear lines of demarcation between diabetic, prediabetic, and healthy subjects.

Similar articles

References

    1. American Diabetes Association Professional Practice Committee 2. Diagnosis and Classification of Diabetes: Standards of Care in Diabetes-2025. Diabetes Care. 2025;48((Suppl. S1)):S27–S49. doi: 10.2337/dc25-S002. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Fact Sheet on Diabetes and Prediabetes. [(accessed on 12 January 2025)]; Available online: https://www.cdc.gov/diabetes/index.html.
    1. American Diabetes Association Professional Practice Committee 9. Pharmacologic Approaches to Glycemic Treatment: Standards of Care in Diabetes-2024. Diabetes Care. 2024;47((Suppl. S1)):S158–S178. doi: 10.2337/dc24-er07a. Erratum in Diabetes Care 2024, 47, 1238. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Knowler W.C., Barrett-Connor E., Fowler S.E., Hamman R.F., Lachin J.M., Walker E.A., Nathan D.M., Diabetes Prevention Program Research Group Reduction in the incidence of type 2 diabetes with lifestyle intervention or metformin. N. Engl. J. Med. 2002;346:393–403. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Steven S., Hollingsworth K.G., Al-Mrabeh A., Avery L., Aribisala B., Caslake M., Taylor R. Very Low-Calorie Diet and 6 Months of Weight Stability in Type 2 Diabetes: Pathophysiological Changes in Responders and Nonresponders. Diabetes Care. 2016;39:808–815. doi: 10.2337/dc15-1942. Erratum in Diabetes Care 2018, 41, 1321. - DOI - PubMed