Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Mar 26;17(4):421.
doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics17040421.

Measurement of Anti-TNF Biologics in Serum Samples of Pediatric Patients: Comparison of Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA) with a Rapid and Automated Fluorescence-Based Lateral Flow Immunoassay

Affiliations

Measurement of Anti-TNF Biologics in Serum Samples of Pediatric Patients: Comparison of Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA) with a Rapid and Automated Fluorescence-Based Lateral Flow Immunoassay

Chiara Rossi et al. Pharmaceutics. .

Abstract

Background: Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of infliximab (IFX) and adalimumab (ADL) mainly relies on the use of enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA). More recently, rapid assays have been developed and validated to reduce turnaround time (TAT). Here, we compared IFX and ADL concentrations measured with both ELISA and a new fluorescence-based lateral flow immunoassay (AFIAS). Methods: In serum samples from pediatric patients, IFX and ADL drug levels, and total anti-IFX antibodies were measured using clinically validated ELISA kits (Immundiagnostik AG). Samples were further analyzed using a new rapid assay (AFIAS, Boditech Med Inc.) to measure drug levels and total anti-IFX antibodies. Results: Spearman's correlation coefficients (rho) were 0.98 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.97 to 0.99] for IFX (p < 0.001) and 0.83 (95% CI 0.72 to 0.90) for ADL (p < 0.001). Calculated % bias was -14.09 (95% Limits of agreement, LoA, -52.83 to 24.66) for IFX and 15.79 (LoA -37.14 to 68.73) for ADL. For the evaluation of total anti-IFX antibodies, we did not collect sufficient data to establish a statistically significant correlation between AFIAS and ELISA. The inter-rater agreement showed a "substantial" and a "moderate" agreement for IFX and ADL, respectively. Conclusions: Our results show that the AFIAS assay has an accuracy and analytical performance comparable to that of the ELISA method used for TDM of IFX and ADL. Therefore, the introduction of this device into routine clinical practice could provide results more quickly and with similar accuracy as ELISA, allowing clinicians to rapidly formulate clinical decisions.

Keywords: anti-TNF biological agents; enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA); fluorescence-based lateral flow immunoassay (AFIAS); pediatric patients; therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM); turnaround time (TAT).

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could influence the work reported in this study.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Passing–Bablok correlations and Bland–Altman plots for infliximab (IFX) and adalimumab (ADL) drug levels. Passing–Bablok correlation plots for IFX (A) and ADL (B) drug levels. Continuous black and red lines indicate the linear and the Deming regression lines, respectively. The dotted blue lines indicate 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Bland–Altman plots of IFX (C) and ADL (D) drug levels. Continuous horizontal blue lines were drawn from top to down at the upper 95% limits of agreement, the mean difference (bias), and the lower 95% limits of agreement. Dotted horizontal black lines indicate the 95% confidence interval (CI) for the mean and the agreement limits (defined as the mean difference ± 1.96 times the standard deviation of the differences).

Similar articles

References

    1. D’Arcangelo G., Distante M., Raso T., Rossetti D., Catassi G., Aloi M. Safety of Biological Therapy in Children with Inflammatory Bowel Disease. J. Pediatr. Gastroenterol. Nutr. 2021;72:736–741. doi: 10.1097/MPG.0000000000003044. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Duijvestein M., Battat R., Vande Casteele N., D’Haens G.R., Sandborn W.J., Khanna R., Jairath V., Feagan B.G. Novel Therapies and Treatment Strategies for Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease. Curr. Treat. Options Gastroenterol. 2018;16:129–146. doi: 10.1007/s11938-018-0175-1. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hyams J., Crandall W., Kugathasan S., Griffiths A., Olson A., Johanns J., Liu G., Travers S., Heuschkel R., Markowitz J., et al. Induction and maintenance infliximab therapy for the treatment of moderate-to-severe Crohn’s disease in children. Gastroenterology. 2007;132:863–873. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2006.12.003. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hyams J.S., Griffiths A., Markowitz J., Baldassano R.N., Faubion W.A., Jr., Colletti R.B., Dubinsky M., Kierkus J., Rosh J., Wang Y., et al. Safety and efficacy of adalimumab for moderate to severe Crohn’s disease in children. Gastroenterology. 2012;143:365–374.e362. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2012.04.046. - DOI - PubMed
    1. van Rheenen P.F., Aloi M., Assa A., Bronsky J., Escher J.C., Fagerberg U.L., Gasparetto M., Gerasimidis K., Griffiths A., Henderson P., et al. The Medical Management of Paediatric Crohn’s Disease: An ECCO-ESPGHAN Guideline Update. J. Crohns Colitis. 2020;15:171–194. doi: 10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjaa161. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources