Induction Treatment for HIV-Associated Cryptococcal Meningitis: Where Have We Been and Where Are We Going?
- PMID: 40284683
- PMCID: PMC12029529
- DOI: 10.3390/microorganisms13040847
Induction Treatment for HIV-Associated Cryptococcal Meningitis: Where Have We Been and Where Are We Going?
Abstract
Cryptococcal meningitis remains a leading cause of morbidity and mortality among individuals with HIV/AIDS, particularly in resource-limited settings. Treatment begins with induction therapy followed by consolidation and maintenance. Evidence related to induction therapy has evolved significantly over the past decade. Current treatment relies primarily on three antifungal agents: amphotericin B, flucytosine, and fluconazole, each with distinct mechanisms of action and limitations. The World Health Organization's 2022 guidelines for induction therapy recommend a single high dose of liposomal amphotericin B combined with 14 days of flucytosine and fluconazole. The 2010 IDSA guidelines for induction therapy recommend amphotericin B deoxycholate and flucytosine for two weeks. The U.S. CDC/NIH/IDSA/HIVMA joint guidelines and the ECCM/ISHAM/ASM joint guidelines list both options, but the recommendation varies by setting resources (e.g., resource-limited vs. other). The newer treatment approaches (single high-dose liposomal amphotericin B) that are supported by trials such as AMBITION-cryptococcal meningitis have limited adoption in high-resource settings, with recent studies showing that only 14% of North American infectious disease providers have utilized the regimen. Adjunctive medications, such as dexamethasone, tamoxifen, and sertraline, have proven ineffective or harmful in clinical trials. This review underscores the ongoing challenges in cryptococcal meningitis treatment and the need for continued research to improve patient outcomes, tracing the evolution from past monotherapy approaches to current combination strategies while exploring future directions.
Keywords: Cryptococcus neoformans; HIV/AIDS; antifungal medications; cryptococcal meningitis; cryptococcosis.
Conflict of interest statement
The other authors declare no conflicts of interest.
References
-
- Poplin V., Smith C., Caceres D.H., Herkert P.F., Jegede O., Thompson G.R., 3rd, Baddley J.W., Schwartz I.S., Kubat R., Deka M.A., et al. Geographical distribution of the Cryptococcus gattii species complex: A systematic review. Lancet Microbe. 2024;5:100921. doi: 10.1016/S2666-5247(24)00161-7. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- UNAIDS Global HIV & AIDS Statistics—Fact Sheet. 2025. [(accessed on 26 February 2025)]. Available online: https://www.unaids.org/en/resources/fact-sheet.
-
- Rajasingham R., Govender N.P., Jordan A., Loyse A., Shroufi A., Denning D.W., Meya D.B., Chiller T.M., Boulware D.R. The global burden of HIV-associated cryptococcal infection in adults in 2020: A modelling analysis. Lancet Infect. Dis. 2022;22:1748–1755. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(22)00499-6. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- World Health Organization . Guidelines for Diagnosing, Preventing and Managing Cryptococcal Disease Among Adults, Adolescents and Children Living with HIV. World Health Organization; Geneva, Switzerland: 2022. WHO Guidelines Approved by the Guidelines Review Committee. - PubMed
Publication types
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous
