Role self-ascription of professionals conducting advance care planning conversations: A thematic analysis
- PMID: 40285339
- PMCID: PMC12102511
- DOI: 10.1177/02692163251331168
Role self-ascription of professionals conducting advance care planning conversations: A thematic analysis
Abstract
Background: During advance care planning, individuals can benefit from the support of a healthcare professional to navigate the intricacies of decision-making. There are specific roles to be played at each level of the process. Evidence is lacking about how professionals understand their role when conducting advance care planning conversations.
Aim: To explore how professionals perceive, define and describe their role when conducting advance care planning conversations.
Design: We conducted this exploratory cross-sectional study in Switzerland from November 2019 to June 2020 by using semi-structured interviews, which were transcribed and thematically analysed with an inductive approach.
Participants: Fourteen professionals having received a training on advance care planning in Switzerland.
Results: We identified three themes: (1) role typology; (2) individual-centred and (3) professional-centred aspects related to role ascription. Roles that professionals undertake were aggregated in two overarching categories, 'facilitators' and 'counsellors', according to whether they prioritise individual's capacity to decide for themselves or their need to receive guidance towards a particular decision. In practice, roles fluctuate between these categories, according to the individuals (to what extent they are informed and eager to engage in autonomous decisions, their communication capacity and desires) or the professional (main profession and involvement in the person's care plan).
Conclusions: Advance care planning requires professionals to be very adaptable and flexible in order to identify the role that they can play in each situation. Training needs to take into consideration this complexity and address it explicitly.
Keywords: Advance care planning; communication; palliative care; role.
Conflict of interest statement
Declaration of conflicting interestsThe author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
References
-
- Rietjens JA, Sudore RL, Connolly M, et al. Definition and recommendations for advance care planning: an international consensus supported by the European Association for Palliative Care. Lancet Oncol 2017; 18(9): e543–e551. - PubMed
-
- Kernick LA, Hogg KJ, Millerick Y, et al. Does advance care planning in addition to usual care reduce hospitalisation for patients with advanced heart failure: a systematic review and narrative synthesis. Palliat Med 2018; 32(10): 1539–1551. - PubMed
-
- Brinkman-Stoppelenburg A, Rietjens JA, Van der Heide A. The effects of advance care planning on end-of-life care: a systematic review. Palliat Med 2014; 28(8): 1000–1025. - PubMed
-
- Jimenez G, Tan WS, Virk AK, et al. Overview of systematic reviews of advance care planning: summary of evidence and global lessons. J Pain Symptom Manage 2018; 56: 436–59.e25. - PubMed
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
