Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Apr 26.
doi: 10.1007/s13187-025-02633-y. Online ahead of print.

Making the BEST Decision-the BESTa Project: Description of the Design and Alpha Phases as Part of the Development of a Digital Decision Aid for Cancer Screening in Sweden

Affiliations

Making the BEST Decision-the BESTa Project: Description of the Design and Alpha Phases as Part of the Development of a Digital Decision Aid for Cancer Screening in Sweden

Kaisa Fritzell et al. J Cancer Educ. .

Abstract

A digital decision aid for cancer screening can gather balanced information in one place and give individuals the opportunity to elucidate their knowledge, values and engage in shared decision-making. Research shows that ethnic minorities and individuals with various functional limitations participate in cancer screening to a lower extent, hence our ambition to make the decision aid as available and applicable as possible, regardless of end-users' traits. The aim was to describe the design and alpha phases of the development of a digital decision aid for CRC screening and tentative end-users' perceptions. Based on a scientific framework for development of decision aids, participants were recruited through multiple channels. The decision aid was evaluated in two steps, a paper version (design phase) and a website prototype (alpha phase), using the think-aloud approach. Data were rich with detailed suggestions for improvements of the decision aid and how it was perceived. A positive outlook on the decision aid was common. Certain words, wordings or visual features were considered difficult and worry or anxiety, related to the content, were expressed. The variation in the findings illustrates the challenges of decision aid development. Still, our findings emphasise the importance of designing a decision aid in co-creation with its end-users. Developing a digital decision aid is complex, why a well-established framework is essential. With the goal of an equal healthcare system, the inclusion of individuals with diverse backgrounds and functional limitations should not only be a fundamental aspect of all research, but a prerequisite.

Keywords: Decision Making, Shared; Decision support techniques; Early detection of cancer; Health promotion; Public health.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declarations. Ethics Approval and Consent to Participate: The risk of violation of integrity was considered small as data were analysed and presented on group level. Individuals gave their consent prior to inclusion; for the design phase, 17 signed a consent form and 1 gave oral consent due to visual impairment. The oral consent was given to both researchers (AJ and KF) before the interview started and was documented in the pre-organised Excel sheet. For the alpha phase, 11 signed a consent form prior to the interview. This project has followed the Swedish statue Ethical Review Act and has been reviewed, before the study started, by The Swedish Ethical Review Authority (Sweden has an ethical authority since 2019) Dnr 2022–00786 - 01. They had no ethical objections. Consent for Publication: Yes, given by all authors. Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests.

Similar articles

References

    1. International Agency for Research on Cancer. European Code against cancer [240215]. Available from: https://cancer-code-europe.iarc.fr/index.php/en/about-code . Accessed 15 Feb 2024
    1. Schüz J, Espina C, Wild CP (2019) Primary prevention: a need for concerted action. Mol Oncol 13(3):567–578 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
    1. Stacey D, Légaré F, Lewis K, Barry MJ, Bennett CL, Eden KB, Holmes-Rovner M, Llewellyn-Thomas H, Lyddiatt A, Thomson R, Trevena L (2017) Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 4(4):CD001431. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD001431
    1. de Klerk CM, Gupta S, Dekker E, Essink-Bot ML (2018) Socioeconomic and ethnic inequities within organised colorectal cancer screening programmes worldwide. Gut 67(4):679–687 - PubMed
    1. Blom J, Saraste D, Törnberg S, Jonsson H (2024) Routine fecal occult blood screening and colorectal cancer mortality in Sweden. JAMA Netw Open 7(2):e240516 - DOI - PubMed - PMC

LinkOut - more resources