Making the BEST Decision-the BESTa Project: Description of the Design and Alpha Phases as Part of the Development of a Digital Decision Aid for Cancer Screening in Sweden
- PMID: 40285812
- DOI: 10.1007/s13187-025-02633-y
Making the BEST Decision-the BESTa Project: Description of the Design and Alpha Phases as Part of the Development of a Digital Decision Aid for Cancer Screening in Sweden
Abstract
A digital decision aid for cancer screening can gather balanced information in one place and give individuals the opportunity to elucidate their knowledge, values and engage in shared decision-making. Research shows that ethnic minorities and individuals with various functional limitations participate in cancer screening to a lower extent, hence our ambition to make the decision aid as available and applicable as possible, regardless of end-users' traits. The aim was to describe the design and alpha phases of the development of a digital decision aid for CRC screening and tentative end-users' perceptions. Based on a scientific framework for development of decision aids, participants were recruited through multiple channels. The decision aid was evaluated in two steps, a paper version (design phase) and a website prototype (alpha phase), using the think-aloud approach. Data were rich with detailed suggestions for improvements of the decision aid and how it was perceived. A positive outlook on the decision aid was common. Certain words, wordings or visual features were considered difficult and worry or anxiety, related to the content, were expressed. The variation in the findings illustrates the challenges of decision aid development. Still, our findings emphasise the importance of designing a decision aid in co-creation with its end-users. Developing a digital decision aid is complex, why a well-established framework is essential. With the goal of an equal healthcare system, the inclusion of individuals with diverse backgrounds and functional limitations should not only be a fundamental aspect of all research, but a prerequisite.
Keywords: Decision Making, Shared; Decision support techniques; Early detection of cancer; Health promotion; Public health.
© 2025. The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
Declarations. Ethics Approval and Consent to Participate: The risk of violation of integrity was considered small as data were analysed and presented on group level. Individuals gave their consent prior to inclusion; for the design phase, 17 signed a consent form and 1 gave oral consent due to visual impairment. The oral consent was given to both researchers (AJ and KF) before the interview started and was documented in the pre-organised Excel sheet. For the alpha phase, 11 signed a consent form prior to the interview. This project has followed the Swedish statue Ethical Review Act and has been reviewed, before the study started, by The Swedish Ethical Review Authority (Sweden has an ethical authority since 2019) Dnr 2022–00786 - 01. They had no ethical objections. Consent for Publication: Yes, given by all authors. Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests.
Similar articles
-
Making the BEST decision-the BESTa project development, implementation and evaluation of a digital Decision Aid in Swedish cancer screening programmes- a description of a research project.PLoS One. 2023 Dec 12;18(12):e0294332. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0294332. eCollection 2023. PLoS One. 2023. PMID: 38085710 Free PMC article.
-
A qualitative systematic review of internal and external influences on shared decision-making in all health care settings.JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2012;10(58):4633-4646. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2012-432. JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2012. PMID: 27820528
-
High Users of Healthcare Services: Development and Alpha Testing of a Patient Decision Aid for Case Management.Patient. 2020 Dec;13(6):757-766. doi: 10.1007/s40271-020-00465-0. Epub 2020 Oct 21. Patient. 2020. PMID: 33083997
-
Developing a breast cancer screening decision aid in Spanish for average-risk women: a mixed methods study.Medwave. 2024 Mar 14;24(2):e2726. doi: 10.5867/medwave.2024.02.2726. Medwave. 2024. PMID: 38484220 Review.
-
Developing a decision aid to guide public sector health policy decisions: a study protocol.Implement Sci. 2011 May 10;6:46. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-6-46. Implement Sci. 2011. PMID: 21569255 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- International Agency for Research on Cancer. European Code against cancer [240215]. Available from: https://cancer-code-europe.iarc.fr/index.php/en/about-code . Accessed 15 Feb 2024
-
- Stacey D, Légaré F, Lewis K, Barry MJ, Bennett CL, Eden KB, Holmes-Rovner M, Llewellyn-Thomas H, Lyddiatt A, Thomson R, Trevena L (2017) Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 4(4):CD001431. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD001431
-
- de Klerk CM, Gupta S, Dekker E, Essink-Bot ML (2018) Socioeconomic and ethnic inequities within organised colorectal cancer screening programmes worldwide. Gut 67(4):679–687 - PubMed
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources