Optimizing infusion-suction diameter ratio (ISDR) in ureteroscopy: in vitro pressure and flow prediction and management
- PMID: 40285912
- DOI: 10.1007/s00240-025-01756-7
Optimizing infusion-suction diameter ratio (ISDR) in ureteroscopy: in vitro pressure and flow prediction and management
Abstract
To optimize channel configurations for a flexible ureteroscope incorporating both irrigation and suction channels, in vitro experiments were conducted with the aim of achieving safer and more efficient surgical procedures. Upper urinary tract models with integrated pressure-sensing ports were constructed based on CT urography reconstructions. Functional ureteroscope prototypes with various combinations of infusion and suction channel diameters were developed. Using a controlled constant-pressure irrigation system, intrarenal pressure measurements were obtained from the upper, middle, and lower calyces, as well as the renal pelvis. The effects of varying infusion pressures on irrigation flow rates and intrarenal pressure distribution were assessed. Regression models were subsequently established for renal pelvic pressure (RPP) and irrigation flow rate, allowing for the determination of the optimal channel diameter configuration by integrating model predictions with clinical requirements. At an infusion pressure of 500 cmH2O without active suction, the maximum Infusion-to-Suction Diameter Ratio (ISDR) that maintained RPP below the safety threshold was approximately 0.525, corresponding to an Infusion-to-Suction cross-sectional Area Ratio (ISAR) of about 0.276. Theoretically, the optimal combination of infusion and suction channel diameters that satisfies both pressure and flow criteria is 1.03 mm and 1.93 mm, respectively. These findings demonstrate that the ISDR, infusion channel caliber, and irrigation pressure are critical determinants of RPP and flow rate during ureteroscopic procedures. For ureteroscopes with integrated infusion and suction channels, maintaining an ISDR below 0.525-or an ISAR below 0.276-provides favorable balance between procedural safety and irrigation efficiency.
Keywords: Design; Flexible ureteroscope; Hydrodynamics; Renal pelvic pressure.
© 2025. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.
Conflict of interest statement
Declarations. Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests.
Similar articles
-
Optimizing aspiration efficiency in RIRS: the impact of ratio of endoscope-sheath diameter, irrigation flow, and negative pressure in an vitro study.Urolithiasis. 2025 May 30;53(1):102. doi: 10.1007/s00240-025-01773-6. Urolithiasis. 2025. PMID: 40445374
-
Intrarenal pressure management using flexible ureteroscope with direct in-scope suction in combination with different size ureteral access sheaths: an experimental ex-vivo study.World J Urol. 2025 Jun 16;43(1):373. doi: 10.1007/s00345-025-05744-9. World J Urol. 2025. PMID: 40522521
-
Renal pelvis pressure and flowrate with a multi-channel ureteroscope: invoking the concept of outflow resistance.Urolithiasis. 2025 Jan 10;53(1):22. doi: 10.1007/s00240-025-01691-7. Urolithiasis. 2025. PMID: 39794465
-
Which flexible ureteroscope is the best for upper tract urothelial carcinoma treatment?World J Urol. 2019 Nov;37(11):2325-2333. doi: 10.1007/s00345-019-02675-0. Epub 2019 Feb 15. World J Urol. 2019. PMID: 30770944 Review.
-
Single-use flexible ureteroscopes: how to choose and what is around the corner?Curr Opin Urol. 2021 Mar 1;31(2):87-94. doi: 10.1097/MOU.0000000000000852. Curr Opin Urol. 2021. PMID: 33399370 Review.
References
-
- Liu Y, Chen Y, Liao B, Luo D, Wang K, Li H et al (2018) Epidemiology of urolithiasis in Asia. Asian J Urol 5(4):205–214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajur.2018.08.007 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
-
- Ye Z, Zeng G, Yang H, Tang K, Zhang X, Li H et al (2018) Efficacy and safety of tamsulosin in medical expulsive therapy for distal ureteral stones with renal colic: a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Eur Urol 73(3):385–391. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2017.10.033 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Zeng G, Traxer O, Zhong W, Osther P, Pearle MS, Preminger GM et al (2023) International alliance of urolithiasis guideline on retrograde intrarenal surgery. BJU Int 131(2):153–164. https://doi.org/10.1111/bju.15836 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Zeinelabden KM, Abdelhalim E, Galal M, Abdelbaky T, Nabeeh H (2024) Flexible ureteroscopy, extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy and mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy for management of lower pole renal hard stones ≤ 2 cm: a prospective randomized study. BMC Urol 24(1):288. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12894-024-01644-z - DOI - PubMed - PMC
-
- Punga AM, Ene C, Bulai CA, Georgescu DA, Multescu R, Georgescu DE et al (2024) Complications of single-use flexible ureteroscopy vs. reusable flexible ureteroscopy: a narrative review. Cureus 16(12):e76256. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.76256 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources