Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Apr 26;53(1):82.
doi: 10.1007/s00240-025-01756-7.

Optimizing infusion-suction diameter ratio (ISDR) in ureteroscopy: in vitro pressure and flow prediction and management

Affiliations

Optimizing infusion-suction diameter ratio (ISDR) in ureteroscopy: in vitro pressure and flow prediction and management

Fengqi Wang et al. Urolithiasis. .

Abstract

To optimize channel configurations for a flexible ureteroscope incorporating both irrigation and suction channels, in vitro experiments were conducted with the aim of achieving safer and more efficient surgical procedures. Upper urinary tract models with integrated pressure-sensing ports were constructed based on CT urography reconstructions. Functional ureteroscope prototypes with various combinations of infusion and suction channel diameters were developed. Using a controlled constant-pressure irrigation system, intrarenal pressure measurements were obtained from the upper, middle, and lower calyces, as well as the renal pelvis. The effects of varying infusion pressures on irrigation flow rates and intrarenal pressure distribution were assessed. Regression models were subsequently established for renal pelvic pressure (RPP) and irrigation flow rate, allowing for the determination of the optimal channel diameter configuration by integrating model predictions with clinical requirements. At an infusion pressure of 500 cmH2O without active suction, the maximum Infusion-to-Suction Diameter Ratio (ISDR) that maintained RPP below the safety threshold was approximately 0.525, corresponding to an Infusion-to-Suction cross-sectional Area Ratio (ISAR) of about 0.276. Theoretically, the optimal combination of infusion and suction channel diameters that satisfies both pressure and flow criteria is 1.03 mm and 1.93 mm, respectively. These findings demonstrate that the ISDR, infusion channel caliber, and irrigation pressure are critical determinants of RPP and flow rate during ureteroscopic procedures. For ureteroscopes with integrated infusion and suction channels, maintaining an ISDR below 0.525-or an ISAR below 0.276-provides favorable balance between procedural safety and irrigation efficiency.

Keywords: Design; Flexible ureteroscope; Hydrodynamics; Renal pelvic pressure.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declarations. Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests.

Similar articles

References

    1. Liu Y, Chen Y, Liao B, Luo D, Wang K, Li H et al (2018) Epidemiology of urolithiasis in Asia. Asian J Urol 5(4):205–214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajur.2018.08.007 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
    1. Ye Z, Zeng G, Yang H, Tang K, Zhang X, Li H et al (2018) Efficacy and safety of tamsulosin in medical expulsive therapy for distal ureteral stones with renal colic: a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Eur Urol 73(3):385–391. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2017.10.033 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Zeng G, Traxer O, Zhong W, Osther P, Pearle MS, Preminger GM et al (2023) International alliance of urolithiasis guideline on retrograde intrarenal surgery. BJU Int 131(2):153–164. https://doi.org/10.1111/bju.15836 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Zeinelabden KM, Abdelhalim E, Galal M, Abdelbaky T, Nabeeh H (2024) Flexible ureteroscopy, extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy and mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy for management of lower pole renal hard stones ≤ 2 cm: a prospective randomized study. BMC Urol 24(1):288. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12894-024-01644-z - DOI - PubMed - PMC
    1. Punga AM, Ene C, Bulai CA, Georgescu DA, Multescu R, Georgescu DE et al (2024) Complications of single-use flexible ureteroscopy vs. reusable flexible ureteroscopy: a narrative review. Cureus 16(12):e76256. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.76256 - DOI - PubMed - PMC

LinkOut - more resources