Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Apr 26;21(1):290.
doi: 10.1186/s12917-025-04533-1.

Influence of wet and dry commercial diets on the oral microbiota of Yorkshire terriers

Affiliations

Influence of wet and dry commercial diets on the oral microbiota of Yorkshire terriers

Corrin Wallis et al. BMC Vet Res. .

Abstract

Background: Periodontal disease is common in dogs and is initiated by the build-up of plaque on the tooth surface. There is evidence that the feeding of dry diets may help prevent the build-up of plaque and calculus compared to softer wet diets. The primary objective of this study was to determine whether diet format influences the microbial composition of dental plaque.

Results: Subgingival (SG) and gingival margin (GM) plaque samples were collected from 28 Yorkshire terriers, housed within a research facility, between 37 and 53 weeks of age. Dogs were fed either wet commercial diets, dry commercial diets, or a simultaneous offering of the two. Illumina sequencing of the 16 S rRNA gene (variable regions 3 and 4) of 43 SG and 43 GM plaque samples resulted in the generation of 6,725,682 paired end reads. Exploratory factor analysis, a statistical method for dimensionality reduction of multivariate data, was used to identify groups of covarying bacterial species. Subsequent mixed effects modelling revealed significant differences in the scores of two of these groupings indicating systematic differences in prevalences of their component taxa. One grouping revealed that for GM plaque samples, the profile of bacterial species most descriptive of the wet diet was biased towards those associated with periodontal disease whereas for the dry diet it was biased towards those associated with healthy gingiva. The dogs fed a mixture of wet and dry diets had bacterial profiles in between the wet and dry diets, i.e. a mix of both health and disease associated taxa. The other bacterial grouping indicated that, in dogs fed a wet diet only, GM plaque was significantly associated with bacteria that preferred aerobic conditions whereas SG plaque was associated with taxa that favoured anaerobic conditions.

Conclusions: Although dry diets shifted the bacterial community towards a healthier profile compared to wet diets there was no evidence of improved periodontal health. Additional methods to maintain dental hygiene should therefore be promoted to ensure effective management of periodontal disease in dogs.

Keywords: Bacterial plaque; Canine; Dog; Microbiome; Oral; Periodontal disease.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declarations. Ethics approval and consent to participate: This study was approved by the Waltham Animal Welfare and Ethical Review Body and run under licensed authority in accordance with the UK Animals (Scientific Procedures) Act 1986. Consent for publication: Not applicable. Competing interests: CW, ZE, GA, LH were employees of Mars Petcare, a manufacturer of commercial pet food, at the time of writing this manuscript. The data in this manuscript has been used to support a patent application.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Non-metric multidimensional scaling dimensions 1 (Dim1) and 2 (Dim2) labelled by sample type (gingival margin plaque (crosshair) and subgingival plaque (filled circle)) and diet (wet (blue), dry (red) or mixture of the two (green)). Ellipses represent 95% bivariate data quantiles for each experimental group
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Boxplots of Shannon diversity for gingival margin and subgingival plaque samples when dogs were fed a dry commercial diet (red), wet commercial diet (blue) or a mixture of the two (green). Individual dots represent outliers
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Stacked bar chart showing the phylum level composition of gingival margin and subgingival plaque when dogs are fed wet commercial diets (wet), dry commercial diets (dry), and a mixture of the two (mixed)
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Boxplots of the scores for Factor Group 3 for gingival margin and subgingival plaque for each diet group: Commercial dry (red), commercial wet (blue), mixture of commercial wet and dry (green). Individual dots represent outliers
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Boxplots of the scores for Factor Group 7 for gingival margin and subgingival plaque for each diet type: Commercial dry (red), commercial wet (blue), mixture of commercial wet and dry (green). Individual dots represent outliers
Fig. 6
Fig. 6
Schematic of the study design together with a summary of the number of dogs sampled and gingival margin and subgingival plaque samples collected at each timepoint

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Butković V, Šimpraga M, Šehić M, Stanin D, Sušić V, Capak D, et al. Dental diseases of dogs: a retrospective study of radiological data. Acta Vet Brno. 2001;70:203–8.
    1. Harvey CE, Shofer FS, Laster L. Association of age and body weight with periodontal disease in north American dogs. J Vet Dent. 1994;11:94–105. - PubMed
    1. Kyllar M, Witter K. Prevalence of dental disorders in pet dogs. Vet Med. 2005;50:496–505.
    1. Isogai H, Isogai E, Okamoto H, Shirakawa H, Nakamura F, Matsumoto T, et al. Epidemiological study on periodontal diseases and some other dental disorders in Dogs. Japanese J Veterinary Sci. 1989;51:1151–62. - PubMed
    1. Kortegaard HE, Eriksen T, Baelum V. Periodontal disease in research beagle dogs-an epidemiological study. J Small Anim Pract. 2008;49:610–6. - PubMed

MeSH terms

Substances

LinkOut - more resources