Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Published Erratum
. 2025 Apr 11:12:1523371.
doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2025.1523371. eCollection 2025.

Corrigendum: Mechanisms by which statins protect endothelial cells from radiation-induced injury in the carotid artery

Affiliations
Published Erratum

Corrigendum: Mechanisms by which statins protect endothelial cells from radiation-induced injury in the carotid artery

Karima Ait-Aissa et al. Front Cardiovasc Med. .

Abstract

[This corrects the article DOI: 10.3389/fcvm.2023.1133315.].

Keywords: carotid stenosis; endothelium; mitochondria; prevention; radiation therapy; statin.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Pravastatin and atorvastatin preserve endothelial function in vivo following head-and-neck IR. (AC) Effects of statins on endothelium-dependent relaxation of the carotid artery in response to acetylcholine (ACh). C57BL/6J mice were treated with (A) vehicle, (B) pravastatin (Prava), or (C) atorvastatin (Ator) after head-and-neck irradiation (12Gy) or sham treatment, and relaxation was tested at 24 and 240 h after irradiation. (DF) Effects of statins on endothelium-independent relaxation of the carotid artery in response to sodium nitroprusside (SNP), in mice treated as in A, B, and C, respectively. (GI) Effects of statins on endothelium-dependent relaxation of mesenteric resistance arteries (MRAs), in mice treated as in A, B, and C, respectively. n = 5 mice per group. p values were determined using repeated measures 2-way ANOVA followed by Tukey's post-hoc test.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Pravastatin protects against IR-induced mitochondrial damage or hyperpolarization in vitro. All panels compare cells subjected to irradiation (4Gy) after pretreatment with pravastatin (Prava, 10 μM) starting at 18 h before irradiation. (A,B) Representative images and signal integrated density of mitoSOX fluorescence normalized to mitoTracker fluorescence in HCAECs at (A) 24 and (B) 240 h after IR. (C,D) mtDNA lesions in DNA extracted from HUVECs at (C) 24 h and (D) 240 h after IR. (E,F) Representative images and integrated density of mitochondrial membrane potential in HCAECs, as determined by TMRM fluorescence, at (E) 24 h and (F) 240 h after irradiation. Analysis per cell, n = 4 independent experiments. p values were determined by Kruskal–Wallis test.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Atorvastatin does not protect against IR-induced mitochondrial damage or hyperpolarization in vitro. All panels compare HCAECs subjected to irradiation (4 Gy) after pretreatment with atorvastatin (Ator, 5 μM) or vehicle. Parameters assessed are: (A,B) Representative images and signal integrated density of MitoSOX fluorescence normalized to MitoTracker fluorescence at (A) 24 and (B) 240 h after irradiation, in cells treated with atorvastatin (5 μM) or vehicle starting 18hr before irradiation. (C,D) Damage to mtDNA as assessed by PCR assay. mtDNA lesions at (C) 24 and (D) 240 h after irradiation, in HUVECs treated with atorvastatin or vehicle starting 18 h before IR. (E,F) Representative images and integrated density of mitochondrial membrane potential, as determined by TMRM fluorescence, at (E) 24 and (F) 240 h after irradiation. Analysis per cell, n = 4 independent experiments, p values by Kruskal–Wallis test.
Figure 7
Figure 7
Pravastatin, but not atorvastatin, prevents irradiation-induced reduction of mtDNA transcription and ETC activity. All panels compare HCAECs subjected to irradiation (4Gy) after pretreatment with atorvastatin (Ator, 5 μM, overnight), pravastatin (Prava, 10 μM, overnight) or vehicle. (AD) Effects of pretreatment with pravastatin (Prava, 10 μM, overnight) on transcriptional activity. (A,B) Quantitative (q)RT-PCR for cytochrome c oxidase I (MT-COI) at (A) 24 and (B) 240 h after irradiation. (CD) qRT-PCR for NADH-ubiquinone oxidoreductase chain 1 (MT-ND1) at (C) 24 and (D) 240 h after irradiation. (EH) Effects of pretreatment with atorvastatin (Ator, 5 μM, overnight) on transcriptional activity. (E,F) qRT-PCR for MT-COI at (E) 24 and (F) 240 h after irradiation. (G,H) qRT-PCR for MT-ND1 at (G) 24 and (H) 240 h after irradiation. (I,J) Activity of ETC complex 1, as assessed by fluorometric assay at (I) 24 and (J) 240 h after irradiation. p values by Kruskal–Wallis test.
Supplementary Figure 3
Supplementary Figure 3
Neither pravastatin nor atorvastatin affects IR-induced transcription of nuclear DNA. (AD) Effects of pretreatment with pravastatin (Prava, 10 μM, 1 h) on nucDNA damage in HCAECs after irradiation (IR, 4 Gy). (A,B) Quantitative (q)RT-PCR for NADH dehydrogenase [ubiquinone] 1 alpha subcomplex subunit 1 [(B), NDUF1], with cDNA normalized to 100 ng at 24 and 240 h after IR. (C,D) qRT-PCR for cytochrome c oxidase 11 [(D), COX11], with cDNA normalized to 100 ng at 24 and 240 h after IR. (EH) Effects of pretreatment with atorvastatin (5 μM, overnight) on nucDNA damage in HCAECs subjected to IR. (E,F) qRT-PCR for NDUF1 (B), with cDNA normalized to 100 ng at 24 and 240 h after IR. (G,H) qRT-PCR for COX11 (D), with cDNA normalized to 100 ng at 24 and 240 h after IR. Statistical analysis by Kruskal–Wallis test. Ns indicates not significant.

Erratum for

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources