Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2025 Apr;41(4):1202-1210.
doi: 10.12669/pjms.41.4.10465.

Peritoneal patch in portal vein reconstruction: Evaluating graft material outcomes in hepatopancreatobiliary and liver transplant surgery - A Systematic Review

Affiliations
Review

Peritoneal patch in portal vein reconstruction: Evaluating graft material outcomes in hepatopancreatobiliary and liver transplant surgery - A Systematic Review

Saira Imtiaz et al. Pak J Med Sci. 2025 Apr.

Abstract

Background & objective: In hepatopancreatobiliary and liver transplant surgeries, portal vein repair is often needed. Peritoneal patches (PPs) might provide an advantage over synthetic grafts for portal vein reconstruction. The objective of this systematic review was to compare clinical outcomes, safety, and effectiveness of PPs versus conventional graft materials.

Methods: A comprehensive search of multiple databases such as PubMed, CINAHL EMBASE, SpringerLink Pakmedinet, and Google Scholar was conducted for studies focusing on portal vein repair using PPs. Eligible studies were case reports, case series, and retrospective studies from January 2000 to December 2024. Due to the heterogeneity of study designs and outcomes, a qualitative synthesis approach was applied.

Results: Six studies were included. The studies reported a variety of surgical techniques and outcomes. Autologous peritoneal interposition grafts and PPs resulted in effective intraoperative portal flow and patency. Some studies, despite generally positive outcomes, reported complications such as thrombosis and significant postoperative events. A rigorous risk of bias assessment was not performed due to the limitations of the study design.

Conclusion: PPs may potentially be an alternative for portal vein reconstruction in HPB and LTx surgeries that offer benefits such as availability, adaptability, and lower immunogenic or thrombotic risks. These results should be confirmed with further research in the forms of prospective and comparative studies.

Keywords: Effectiveness; Graft material; Peritoneal patch; Portal vein reconstruction; Safety; Systematic review.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig.1
Fig.1
PRISMA flow diagram for the study selection.
Fig.2
Fig.2
Peritoneal patch length (mm) use.

References

    1. Khalil A, Quaglia A, Gélat P, Saffari N, Rashidi H, Davidson B. New developments and challenges in liver transplantation. J Clin Med. 2022;12(17):5586. doi:10.3390/jcm12175586. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lee SG, Song GW, Hwang S, Ha TY, Moon DB, Jung DH, et al. Surgical treatment of hilar cholangiocarcinoma in the new era:The Asan experience. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2010;17(4):476–489. doi:10.1007/s00534-009-0204-5. - PubMed
    1. Igami T, Nishio H, Ebata T, Yokoyama Y, Sugawara G, Nimura Y, et al. Surgical treatment of hilar cholangiocarcinoma in the “new era”:The Nagoya University experience. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2010;17(4):449–454. doi:10.1007/s00534-009-0209-0. - PubMed
    1. Kleive D, Berstad AE, Sahakyan MA, Verbeke CS, Naper C, Haugvik SP, et al. Portal vein reconstruction using primary anastomosis or venous interposition allograft in pancreatic surgery. J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord. 2018;6(1):66–74. doi:10.1016/j.jvsv.2017.09.003. - PubMed
    1. Bacalbasa N, Balescu I, Vilcu M, Dima S, Iliescu L, Brezean I, et al. Superior mesenteric and portal vein reconstruction with cadaveric allograft during pancreatoduodenectomy - a case report and literature review. In Vivo. 2020;34(2):787–791. doi:10.21873/invivo.11839. - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources