Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Feb 24;38(3):229-232.
doi: 10.1080/08998280.2025.2465055. eCollection 2025.

Digital clinical decision support to improve care and to save costs: a pilot survey of the views of frontline healthcare professionals

George West  1 , Jonathan Foo  2 , Dragan Ilic  3 , Kieran Walsh  4
Affiliations

Digital clinical decision support to improve care and to save costs: a pilot survey of the views of frontline healthcare professionals

George West et al. Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent). .

Abstract

Introduction: There has been much discourse about the features and impact of clinical decision support. However, until recently, there has been less evidence on how healthcare professionals use decision support to provide evidence-based care or on the potential cost savings that could emerge from its use. This study attempted to fill this gap by asking healthcare professionals to what extent they value digital clinical decision support as a means to apply evidence-based care and to save costs.

Methods: Frontline resident doctors were invited to complete an online semistructured questionnaire on if, and how, they used a clinical decision support resource to obtain and apply information to provide evidence-based care and/or to save costs.

Results: Among the respondents, 93% agreed or strongly agreed that the clinical decision support helped them obtain information to provide evidence-based care, and 93% agreed or strongly agreed that they could apply the information obtained from the resource to provide evidence-based care. Half of the respondents agreed or strongly agreed that using the resource helped them save healthcare costs.

Discussion: The results strongly support the idea that the doctors used the resource to provide evidence-based care; the results related to cost savings were not as strong.

Keywords: Clinical decision support; costs; healthcare professionals; improvement.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors report no funding. KW works for BMJ; the other authors report no potential conflicts of interest.

Similar articles

See all similar articles

References

    1. Kwag KH, González-Lorenzo M, Banzi R, Bonovas S, Moja L.. Providing doctors with high-quality information: an updated evaluation of web-based point-of-care information summaries. J Med Internet Res. 2016;18(1):e15. doi:10.2196/jmir.5234. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Wasylewicz ATM, Scheepers-Hoeks AMJW.. 2019. Clinical decision support systems. In: Kubben P, Dumontier M, Dekker A, eds. Fundamentals of Clinical Data Science. Cham: Springer; 2018: Chapter 11. - PubMed
    1. Keasberry J, Scott IA, Sullivan C, Staib A, Ashby R.. Going digital: a narrative overview of the clinical and organisational impacts of eHealth technologies in hospital practice. Aust Health Rev. 2017;41(6):646–664. doi:10.1071/AH16233. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Muhiyaddin R, Abd-Alrazaq AA, Househ M, Alam T, Shah Z.. The impact of clinical decision support systems (CDSS) on physicians: a scoping review. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2020;272:470–473. doi:10.3233/SHTI200597. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Petkus H, Hoogewerf J, Wyatt JC.. What do senior physicians think about AI and clinical decision support systems: quantitative and qualitative analysis of data from specialty societies. Clin Med (Lond). 2020;20(3):324–328. doi:10.7861/clinmed.2019-0317. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources