Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2025 Apr 11:19:1570104.
doi: 10.3389/fnins.2025.1570104. eCollection 2025.

Neuromorphic algorithms for brain implants: a review

Affiliations
Review

Neuromorphic algorithms for brain implants: a review

Wiktoria Agata Pawlak et al. Front Neurosci. .

Abstract

Neuromorphic computing technologies are about to change modern computing, yet most work thus far has emphasized hardware development. This review focuses on the latest progress in algorithmic advances specifically for potential use in brain implants. We discuss current algorithms and emerging neurocomputational models that, when implemented on neuromorphic hardware, could match or surpass traditional methods in efficiency. Our aim is to inspire the creation and deployment of models that not only enhance computational performance for implants but also serve broader fields like medical diagnostics and robotics inspiring next generations of neural implants.

Keywords: biohybrid interfaces; brain implants; brain-computer interfaces (BCIs); data compression; mixed-signal design; neurocomputational models; neuromorphic computing; spiking neural networks (SNNs).

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Authors WP and NH were employed by company ni2o.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Illustrates the signal processing workflow for brain implants across the three tiers: external (on-workstation), on-node, and fully on-implant processing. Each tier highlights differences in hardware, bandwidth, tasks, and trade-offs between latency, power, and computational efficiency.
Figure 2
Figure 2
An example of a neuromorphic pipeline for brain implants, starting with neural recording and progressing through event-driven processing, spiking neural network computation, and adaptive neuromodulation for closed-loop control.

Similar articles

References

    1. Aboumerhi K., Güemes A., Liu H., Tenore F., Etienne-Cummings R. (2023). Neuromorphic applications in medicine. J. Neural Eng. 20:041004. doi: 10.1088/1741-2552/aceca3, PMID: - DOI - PubMed
    1. Adam J., Pichler W. J., Yerly D. (2010). Delayed drug hypersensitivity: models of T-cell stimulation. Br. J. Clin. Pharmacol. 71, 701–707. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.2010.03764.x, PMID: - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ahmadi A., Gomar S., Ahmadi M. (2024). Editorial: from theory to practice: the latest developments in neuromorphic computing applications. Front. Neurosci. 18:1511987. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2024.1511987, PMID: - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Alberts B., et al. . (2002). Extracellular control of cell division, cell growth, and apoptosis. Available online at: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK26877/.
    1. Aldag N., Nogueira W. (2024). Psychoacoustic and electroencephalographic responses to changes in amplitude modulation depth and frequency in relation to speech recognition in cochlear implantees. Sci. Rep. 14:8181. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-58225-1, PMID: - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources