Prevalence of low back pain in hemodialysis patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis with Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation evidence classification
- PMID: 40292169
- PMCID: PMC12029389
- DOI: 10.4103/jcvjs.jcvjs_192_24
Prevalence of low back pain in hemodialysis patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis with Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation evidence classification
Abstract
Background: Musculoskeletal pain complaints have a high epidemiological and clinical burden in hemodialysis patients. Previous original studies indicate that low back pain (LBP) may have an important contribution to these complaints. This systematic review aimed to estimate the global prevalence of LBP in chronic hemodialysis patients.
Methods: Systematic review and meta-analysis with Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation approach for quality of evidence. Searches were performed in CINAHL, Embase, LILACS, MEDLINE/PubMed, and Scientific Electronic Library Online databases until July 2023. The Inverse Variance Heterogeneity model was used to pool prevalence estimates.
Results: The review included 19 original articles that provided data from 2713 patients. The overall pooled prevalence of LBP was 30.2% (95% confidence interval [CI] =19.0%-42.0%; k = 19 articles). The sex-specific pooled prevalence of LBP was 29.6% (95% CI = 18.7%-41.2%; k = 6 articles) in females and 36.6% (95% CI = 26.0%-47.7%; k = 6 articles) in males. The duration-specific pooled prevalence of LBP was 13.2% (95% CI = 8.6%-18.4%; k = 2 articles) for acute and 30.7% (95% CI = 11.3%-52.2%; k = 7 articles) for chronic LBP. The frequency of LBP estimated over the total number of pain complaints was 39.6% (95% CI = 23.0%-56.8%; k = 10 articles).
Conclusion: The overall estimate shows that three out of 10 hemodialysis patients suffer from LBP. This condition is accountable for nearly 40% of pain complaints in such patients. The quality of evidence for the pooled estimates is low or very low, and future prevalence studies with adequate statistical power and definitions of LBP are needed to provide more accurate data.
Keywords: Development; Grading of Recommendations Assessment; and Evaluation approach; low back pain; prevalence; renal dialysis; systematic review.
Copyright: © 2025 Journal of Craniovertebral Junction and Spine.
Conflict of interest statement
There are no conflicts of interest.
Figures





Similar articles
-
Is Vitamin D Supplementation Effective for Low Back Pain? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Pain Physician. 2018 Mar;21(2):121-145. Pain Physician. 2018. PMID: 29565945
-
Is immediate imaging important in managing low back pain?J Athl Train. 2011 Jan-Feb;46(1):99-102. doi: 10.4085/1062-6050-46.1.99. J Athl Train. 2011. PMID: 21214357 Free PMC article.
-
A systematic review and meta-analysis of low back pain and its associated factors among school teachers in Africa.BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2023 Jun 17;24(1):499. doi: 10.1186/s12891-023-06633-1. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2023. PMID: 37330490 Free PMC article.
-
Global and regional estimates of clinical and economic burden of low back pain in high-income countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Front Public Health. 2023 Jun 9;11:1098100. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1098100. eCollection 2023. Front Public Health. 2023. PMID: 37383269 Free PMC article.
-
Prevalence of low back pain in Iranian nurses: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC Nurs. 2017 Sep 11;16:50. doi: 10.1186/s12912-017-0243-1. eCollection 2017. BMC Nurs. 2017. PMID: 28912666 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Ammer K, Ebenbichler G, Bochdansky T. Low back pain –A disease or condition of impaired functional health? Definition-inherent consequences for the comprehensive care of back pain patients. BioMed. 2022;2:270–81.
-
- Violante FS, Mattioli S, Bonfiglioli R. Low-back pain. Handb Clin Neurol. 2015;131:397–410. - PubMed
Publication types
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous