Rapid goal-directed elbow flexion movements: limitations of the speed control system due to neural constraints
- PMID: 4029322
- DOI: 10.1007/BF00261336
Rapid goal-directed elbow flexion movements: limitations of the speed control system due to neural constraints
Abstract
In rapid goal-directed elbow flexion movements the influence of both movement amplitude and inertial load on the three-burst pattern and the consequences on movement time were studied. Subjects performed visually guided, self-paced movements as rapidly and as accurately as possible. An increase of both the movement amplitude and the inertial load were found to be interacting factors for the modulation of the three-burst-pattern and movement time. The first biceps burst progressively increased in duration and amplitude for larger movements, resulting in prolonged movement times. Surplus inertial loads further prolonged the agonist burst for large, but not for small movement amplitudes. The activity of the antagonist burst, in contrast, was largest in small movements and successively decreased at increasing movement amplitudes. Its duration, however, remained fairly constant. As was similarly observed for the agonist burst, surplus inertial loads lead to a prolongation of antagonist burst duration and an small movement amplitudes. It is suggested that in elbow flexion movements the programming of fastest goal-directed movements must take into account neural constraints and biomechanical characteristics of the agonist muscle and the antagonist muscle. Due to neural constraints of the biceps muscle, in contrast to finger movements, the concept of movement time invariance does not hold for elbow movements. Furthermore, neural constraints of the antagonist muscle lead to a limited force production of the agonist muscle at small movement amplitudes in order to avoid an overload of the braking process.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
Similar articles
-
Control processes underlying elbow flexion movements may be independent of kinematic and electromyographic patterns: experimental study and modelling.Neuroscience. 1997 Jul;79(1):295-316. doi: 10.1016/s0306-4522(97)00071-7. Neuroscience. 1997. PMID: 9178885
-
Step-tracking movements of the wrist. III. Influence of changes in load on patterns of muscle activity.J Neurosci. 1993 Dec;13(12):5212-27. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.13-12-05212.1993. J Neurosci. 1993. PMID: 8254369 Free PMC article.
-
On the voluntary movement of compliant (inertial-viscoelastic) loads by parcellated control mechanisms.J Neurophysiol. 1996 Nov;76(5):3207-29. doi: 10.1152/jn.1996.76.5.3207. J Neurophysiol. 1996. PMID: 8930267
-
Effects of weak antagonist on fast elbow flexion movements in man.Exp Brain Res. 1992;91(3):509-19. doi: 10.1007/BF00227847. Exp Brain Res. 1992. PMID: 1483523
-
Control of voluntary trunk movements in man. Mechanisms for postural equilibrium during standing.Acta Physiol Scand Suppl. 1990;595:1-60. Acta Physiol Scand Suppl. 1990. PMID: 2080712 Review.
Cited by
-
Effects of transcranial magnetic stimulation on single and sequential arm movements.Exp Brain Res. 1994;98(3):501-6. doi: 10.1007/BF00233987. Exp Brain Res. 1994. PMID: 8056070
-
The electromyographical basis of inaccurate motor performance.Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol. 1988;58(1-2):132-40. doi: 10.1007/BF00636616. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol. 1988. PMID: 3203658
-
Rapid movements with reversals in direction. II. Control of movement amplitude and inertial load.Exp Brain Res. 1988;69(2):355-67. doi: 10.1007/BF00247580. Exp Brain Res. 1988. PMID: 3345812
-
Influence of joint interactional effects on the coordination of planar two-joint arm movements.Exp Brain Res. 1995;103(3):451-9. doi: 10.1007/BF00241504. Exp Brain Res. 1995. PMID: 7789451
-
Relationship between EMG patterns and kinematic properties for flexion movements at the human wrist.Exp Brain Res. 1987;66(2):247-56. doi: 10.1007/BF00243302. Exp Brain Res. 1987. PMID: 3595772
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Research Materials