Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1985;59(3):548-58.
doi: 10.1007/BF00261346.

The interaction of conflicting retinal motion stimuli in oculomotor control

The interaction of conflicting retinal motion stimuli in oculomotor control

G R Barnes et al. Exp Brain Res. 1985.

Abstract

Oculomotor response has been assessed in humans during the presentation of conflicting retinal motion stimuli. In the majority of experiments a background stimulus was made to move with a constant velocity ramp in one direction followed by rapid resets at regular intervals. In the absence of an adequate fixation target this ramp-reset stimulus induced a nystagmus with a slow-phase velocity and saccadic frequency which remained almost constant as reset frequency was increased from 2 to 5 Hz. Moreover, the induced eye velocity could be considerably increased if the subject attempted 'active' matching of display velocity. During both 'active' and 'passive' responses eye velocity gain reached a peak when display velocity was between 2 degrees/s and 5 degrees/s. The presence of small stationary targets induced a suppression of the passive ramp-reset response which was modified by target eccentricity and by tachistoscopic target illumination. When subjects pursued a sinusoidally oscillating target against a stationary structured background, eye velocity gain was significantly less than for pursuit against a blank background. The degree of interaction between conflicting stimuli was found to be dependent on their relative size, peripheral location and velocity. However, it appears that the human observer is able selectively to enhance feedback gain from one particular source in order to dominate stimuli from other unwanted sources.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Exp Brain Res. 1983;52(2):248-56 - PubMed
    1. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1981;374:491-503 - PubMed
    1. Exp Brain Res. 1983;52(1):9-19 - PubMed
    1. Vision Res. 1979;19(10):1105-15 - PubMed
    1. AMA Arch Ophthalmol. 1954 Dec;52(6):932-41 - PubMed