Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Aug 15;157(4):627-633.
doi: 10.1002/ijc.35435. Epub 2025 Apr 28.

Should the age range of the Dutch hrHPV-based cervical cancer screening program be broadened? A modelling study using cohort effects

Affiliations

Should the age range of the Dutch hrHPV-based cervical cancer screening program be broadened? A modelling study using cohort effects

Sylvia Kaljouw et al. Int J Cancer. .

Abstract

In the Netherlands, women are invited for human papillomavirus (HPV) screening between the ages of 30 and 60 (with conditional screening at age 65). However, an increase in cervical cancer (CC) incidence has been observed in younger women recently. Meanwhile, HPV-vaccinated cohorts reached the screening age of 30 in 2023. Moreover, increasing healthy life expectancy is a consideration for screening in older age groups. Due to these developments, the starting and ending ages of the HPV screening programs should be reconsidered. Microsimulation model MISCAN-Cervix was recalibrated for cohort effects using updated CC incidence data. We used this model to calculate the cost-effectiveness of screening unvaccinated women in birth cohorts 1962-1992 until 65 years old. Additionally, we considered starting screening at 25 for partly vaccinated cohorts (born in 2002-2006). Vaccination effects were calculated using microsimulation model STDSIM. Main outcome measures included cancers prevented, life years gained (LYG), costs, and referrals compared to the current strategy (2027 onwards). Adding screening at age 65 to the current strategy leads to +3.5% cancers prevented, +10.3% referrals, +2.4% LYG and +57.0% costs (cost-effectiveness ratio: €275,096/LYG). Adding screening at age 25 results in extra cases prevented (+1.3%-5.7%, depending on the target group's vaccination status) and LYG (+0.8%-3.7%), but increases referrals (12.9%-37.1%) and costs (+14.0%-33.1%) (cost-effectiveness ratio: €120,017-€323,813/LYG). So, screening unvaccinated women at 65 years old and screening women in (partly-)vaccinated cohorts at age 25 might not represent good value for money.

Keywords: HPV vaccination; age range; cohort effects; hrHPV‐based screening; simulation model.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

All authors report receiving funding from the Dutch National Institute for Public Health and the Environment for the conduct of this study.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Cancer incidence as an average over 5 years for birth cohorts 1978–1982, 1983–1987, 1988–1992, and 1993+. The black data points are national cancer registry data with corresponding 95% confidence intervals. Blue and red lines are model outcomes before and after recalibration, respectively. CC, cervical cancer.
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
(Undiscounted) harms and benefits for unvaccinated cohorts (A) and partly vaccinated cohorts (B) compared to a situation without screening. *Women are additionally screened at age 65 if they tested HPV‐positive at age 60 and were not referred to a gynecologist.

Similar articles

References

    1. Rijksinstituut voor Volksgezondheid en Milieu (RIVM; National Institute for Public Health and the Environment) . Bevolkingsonderzoek Baarmoederhalskanker [National Screening Programme Cervical Cancer], vol. 2023.
    1. Sasieni P, Castanon A, Parkin DM. How many cervical cancers are prevented by treatment of screen‐detected disease in young women? Int J Cancer. 2009;124:461‐464. - PubMed
    1. Bruni L, Serrano B, Roura E, et al. Cervical cancer screening programmes and age‐specific coverage estimates for 202 countries and territories worldwide: a review and synthetic analysis. Lancet Glob Health. 2022;10(8):e1115‐e27. doi: 10.1016/s2214-109x(22)00241-8 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Eurostat . Life expectancy by age and sex, vol. 2023. 2022.
    1. Praagman J, Slotman E, Van Disseldorp L, Lemmens V. Kanker in Nederland: Trends en Prognoses tot en Met 2032 [Cancer in The Netherlands: Trends and Prognoses until 2032]. IKNL; 2022.

MeSH terms

Substances