Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Multicenter Study
. 2025 Nov;50(11):5232-5241.
doi: 10.1007/s00261-025-04960-6. Epub 2025 Apr 28.

Predictors of hepatocellular carcinoma in LR-M category lesions, a multi-institutional analysis

Affiliations
Multicenter Study

Predictors of hepatocellular carcinoma in LR-M category lesions, a multi-institutional analysis

Marybeth Nedrud et al. Abdom Radiol (NY). 2025 Nov.

Abstract

Purpose: The Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS, LR) provides a framework for diagnosing hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC, LR-5). However, not all HCCs meet LR-5 criteria and are instead categorized as LR-M, probably or definitely malignant but not specific for HCC, necessitating biopsy for diagnosis. The purpose is to identify factors associated with HCC in LR-M observations.

Methods: This is an IRB-approved, retrospective analysis of participants from 8 institutions that had a LR-M observation on CT or MRI with corresponding histopathologic diagnosis. Demographics and biochemical data were examined. Central review using the LI-RADS v2018 algorithm was performed. Kappa statistics defined inter-reader agreement. Random forest and logistic regression analyses generated a model for HCC diagnosis.

Results: 162 participants with 162 LR-M observations were included. 46% of observations (74/162) were HCC and 37% were cholangiocarcinoma (60/162). Two of 34 imaging features- observation size and intra-lesion iron- showed moderate to strong inter-reader agreement (Kappa ≥ 0.60) while the remainder showed weak or no agreement (Kappa < 0.60). Random forest analysis showed biochemical features to be more predictive of HCC than imaging features. Logistic regression analysis of a model based on INR and AFP provided a 72% sensitivity and 61% specificity for HCC by Youden's index and a 90% specificity threshold yielded 38% sensitivity, 75% positive predictive value, and 66% negative predictive value.

Conclusions: Our results show INR and AFP are associated with HCC in LR-M observations. A high-specificity threshold may assist in the non-invasive diagnosis of HCC in the appropriate setting. In certain at-risk patients with a LR-M observation on diagnostic imaging, serum AFP and INR maybe useful tools for the non-invasive diagnosis of HCC.

Keywords: Alpha-fetoprotein (AFP); Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC); Liver imaging reporting and data system (LI-RADS); Malignancy predictors.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declarations. Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests.

References

    1. Chernyak V, Fowler KJ, Kamaya A, Kielar AZ, Elsayes KM, Bashir MR, Kono Y, et al. Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) Version 2018: Imaging of Hepatocellular Carcinoma in At-Risk Patients. Radiology 2018;289:816–830.
    1. Bialecki ES, Di Bisceglie AM. Diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma. HPB (Oxford) 2005;7:26–34. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Lee YT, Wang JJ, Zhu Y, Agopian VG, Tseng HR, Yang JD. Diagnostic Criteria and LI-RADS for Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Clin Liver Dis (Hoboken) 2021;17:409–413. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Fowler KJ, Potretzke TA, Hope TA, Costa EA, Wilson SR. LI-RADS M (LR-M): definite or probable malignancy, not specific for hepatocellular carcinoma. Abdom Radiol (NY) 2018;43:149–157. - DOI - PubMed
    1. van der Pol CB, Lim CS, Sirlin CB, McGrath TA, Salameh JP, Bashir MR, Tang A, et al. Accuracy of the Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System in Computed Tomography and Magnetic Resonance Image Analysis of Hepatocellular Carcinoma or Overall Malignancy-A Systematic Review. Gastroenterology 2019;156:976–986. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types