Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Apr 28.
doi: 10.1007/s10899-025-10388-w. Online ahead of print.

"It Was Never-Ending…": Investigating Gambling Harm Reported by Affected Others

Affiliations

"It Was Never-Ending…": Investigating Gambling Harm Reported by Affected Others

Kimberley Spence et al. J Gambl Stud. .

Abstract

Gambling-related harm can extend to family members, friends, and communities, however few population-representative studies explore affected other (AO) attributable harm measured with direct reference to gambling. Moreover, no study has employed the full 68-item Gambling Checklist for AOs to investigate harm according to the domains of harm outlined in a recent comprehensive harms taxonomy. Using data from a subsample of 197 AOs identified via a population-representative sample of 5000 respondents from the Fourth Social and Economic Impact Study of Gambling in Tasmania, this study employed a mixed-method design aiming to: (1) quantitatively estimate the rates of AO harms across each domain of harm; and (2) qualitatively analyse semi-structured interview data in a subset of 20 AOs to explore their lived experience of these harms. Overall, emotional/ psychological harm was the most commonly reported (90.36%, 95% CI: 85.32%, 93.79%), followed by relationship harm (75.63%, 95% CI: 69.10%, 81.17%), financial harm (60.91%, 95% CI: 53.87%, 67.53%), health harm (58.67%, 95% CI: 51.59%, 65.41%), work or study harm (32.63%, 95% CI: 26.29%, 39.68%), and other harm (19.17%, 95% CI: 14.18%, 25.40%). The qualitative narratives revealed the interconnected vulnerabilities experienced by AOs across the broad domains of harm. The findings emphasise the importance of targeted interventions, public health promotion, and comprehensive support services to address the diverse harms to AOs. Key areas for intervention include psychological and emotional support, financial guidance, and raising awareness to facilitate early detection of stress-related health conditions, with collaboration between services crucial for developing integrated support systems.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declarations. Ethical Approval: The Fourth SEIS received ethics approval from the Deakin University Human Research Ethics Committee (Protocol #2017-145), and the secondary analysis presented in this manuscript was approved by an exemption from ethical review provided by the Deakin University Human Research Ethics Committee (2020-410). Competing Interests: The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare in relation to this article. The 3-year declaration of interest statement of this research team is as follows: In the last three years, ND and SM have received research and consultancy funding from multiple sources, including via hypothecated taxes from gambling revenue. ND has received research funding from the Victorian Responsible Gambling Foundation, New South Wales Office of Responsible Gambling, Tasmanian Department of Treasury and Finance, Gambling Research Australia, Svenka Spel’s Independent Research Council, Health Research Council of New Zealand, and New Zealand Ministry of Health. She has been the recipient of a Deakin University Faculty of Health Mid-Career Fellowship. SM has received research funding from the Victorian Responsible Gambling Foundation, New South Wales Office of Responsible Gambling, Gambling Research Australia, Health Research Council of New Zealand and the New Zealand Ministry of Health. She is currently the recipient of a New South Wales Office of Responsible Gambling Postdoctoral Research Fellowship. MB and MR have received research and consultancy funding from various governmental sources, including New South Wales Office of Responsible Gambling, Victorian Responsible Gambling Foundation, New Zealand Ministry of Health, Gambling Research Australia, and the Government of South Australia. These funds have supported a range of studies including the impacts of gambling, gambling behaviours, and gambling regulation. MR and MB have not received research or consultancy funding directly from the gambling, tobacco, or alcohol industries or any other industry-sponsored organization. In the last 3 years, SD has received research funding from the New Zealand Ministry of Health. None of the authors have knowingly received research or consultancy funding from the gambling, tobacco, or alcohol industries or any industry-sponsored organisation.

Similar articles

References

    1. Australian Bureau of Statistics (2016a). 2016 Census All persons QuickStats. https://doi.org/https://www.abs.gov.au/census/find-census-data/quickstat...
    1. Australian Bureau of Statistics (2016b). Census of Population and Housing: Socio-Economic Indexes for Areas (SEIFA), Australia, 2016. https://www.abs.gov.au/ausstats/abs@.nsf/Lookup/2033.0.55.001main+featur...
    1. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative research in psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1191/1478088706QP...
    1. Browne, M., & Rockloff, M. J. (2020). Measuring behavioural dependence in gambling: A case for removing harmful consequences from the assessment of problem gambling pathology. Journal of Gambling Studies, 36(4), 1027–1044. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Browne, M., Langham, E., Rawat, V., Greer, N., Li, E., Rose, J., Rockloff, M., Donaldson, P., Thorne, H., & Goodwin, B. (2016). Assessing gambling-related harm in Victoria: A public health perspective.

LinkOut - more resources