Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2025 Jun 3:222:115444.
doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2025.115444. Epub 2025 Apr 22.

Nordic colorectal cancer screening programmes: A comparison of organization, operation, and quality indicators

Affiliations
Free article
Comparative Study

Nordic colorectal cancer screening programmes: A comparison of organization, operation, and quality indicators

Susanne Fogh Jørgensen et al. Eur J Cancer. .
Free article

Abstract

Introduction: While comparison studies are common in the Nordic countries, important differences need to be illuminated to understand the comparability of future studies within colorectal cancer (CRC) screening research. Therefore, a systematic overview of similarities and differences in the CRC screening programmes in Denmark, Finland, Iceland, Norway, and Sweden was conducted METHODS: Information from each country was gathered through the Nordic CRC screening network, which includes experts in CRC screening from the participating countries. A timeline describing preceding pilot studies and national roll-outs in all countries was established. Furthermore, the screening flow in each country and the quality indicator monitoring including performance standards were presented.

Results: During 2014-2024, all five Nordic countries implemented CRC screening using faecal immunochemical testing (FIT) but with different implementation strategies and cut-off values. Taking colonoscopy resources into account, gradual implementation strategies were used in all countries, but with different paces. Quality monitoring follows the European recommendations with some variation; however key performance indicators such as adenoma detection rates (ADR), colonoscopy complication rates, serrated polyp detection, post-colonoscopy CRC (PCCRC) rates, and interval cancer rates, are monitored by all countries.

Conclusion: This paper may serve as a key reference for future research and comparison studies across the Nordic countries. The variation found in countries with similar health care systems might serve as natural experiments in future studies. Furthermore, this overview shows that there might be room for improvements in the monitoring of certain quality indicators to facilitate quality improvement efforts in all Nordic countries.

Keywords: Colonic Polyps; Colonoscopy; Colorectal neoplasms; Health plan implementation; Healthcare; Mass screening; Quality assurance; Quality indicators; Scandinavian and Nordic countries.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: KRR and ALS report that Ferring Pharmaceuticals have provided bowel preparation free of charge in the Norwegian Pilot trial. However, not relevant for this study. SFJ, SHN, HB, AA, AN, TS, RS and BP declare no conflicts of interest.

MeSH terms