Improving transparency in clinical trial reporting
- PMID: 40294530
- PMCID: PMC12037211
- DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1004588
Improving transparency in clinical trial reporting
Abstract
The power to interpret the results of randomised clinical trial results relies on transparent reporting of the study design, protocol, methods and analyses. Without such clarity, the benefits of the findings, to both healthcare, policy and research, cannot be realized in full. The publication of the updated CONSORT 2025 and SPIRIT 2025 statements for reporting of randomised clinical trials and protocols, respectively, offers the opportunity to reflect on the power that transparent reporting of clinical trial design and data offers to improve the quality of trials and outcomes.
Copyright: © 2025 Alison Farrell. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Conflict of interest statement
I have read the journal’s policy and the author of this manuscript has the following competing interests: The author’s individual competing interests are at https://journals.plos.org/plosmedicine/s/staff-editors. PLOS is funded partly through manuscript publication charges, but the PLOS Medicine Editors are paid a fixed salary (their salaries are not linked to the number of papers published in the journal).
Comment on
-
CONSORT 2025 statement: Updated guideline for reporting randomised trials.PLoS Med. 2025 Apr 14;22(4):e1004587. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1004587. eCollection 2025 Apr. PLoS Med. 2025. PMID: 40228477 Free PMC article.
-
SPIRIT 2025 statement: Updated guideline for protocols of randomised trials.PLoS Med. 2025 Apr 28;22(4):e1004589. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1004589. eCollection 2025 Apr. PLoS Med. 2025. PMID: 40294521 Free PMC article.
Similar articles
-
Recommendations and evidence for reporting items in pediatric clinical trial protocols and reports: two systematic reviews.Trials. 2015 Sep 18;16:417. doi: 10.1186/s13063-015-0954-0. Trials. 2015. PMID: 26385379 Free PMC article.
-
Improving outcome reporting in clinical trial reports and protocols: study protocol for the Instrument for reporting Planned Endpoints in Clinical Trials (InsPECT).Trials. 2019 Mar 6;20(1):161. doi: 10.1186/s13063-019-3248-0. Trials. 2019. PMID: 30841935 Free PMC article.
-
SPIRIT 2025 statement: updated guideline for protocols of randomised trials.BMJ. 2025 Apr 28;389:e081477. doi: 10.1136/bmj-2024-081477. BMJ. 2025. PMID: 40294953 Free PMC article.
-
An assessment of the reporting quality of randomised controlled trials relating to anti-arrhythmic agents (2002-2011).Int J Cardiol. 2013 Sep 30;168(2):1393-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2012.12.020. Epub 2013 Jan 5. Int J Cardiol. 2013. PMID: 23298560 Review.
-
The 2001 STRICTA recommendations for reporting acupuncture research: a review with implications for improving controlled clinical trial design.J Altern Complement Med. 2009 Feb;15(2):147-51. doi: 10.1089/acm.2008.0141. J Altern Complement Med. 2009. PMID: 19183071 Review.
Cited by
-
Charting the future of PLOS Medicine: Priorities for evidence, impact, and equity.PLoS Med. 2025 Jul 30;22(7):e1004691. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1004691. eCollection 2025 Jul. PLoS Med. 2025. PMID: 40737306 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Chan A-W, Boutron I, Hopewell S, Moher D, Schulz KF, Collins GS, et al.. SPIRIT 2025 statement: updated guideline for protocols of randomised trial. PLOS Med. 2025;22(4). - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical