The Long-term Outcomes of Borderline Resectable T3 in Locally Advanced Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma Treated With Neoadjuvant Triplet Chemotherapy
- PMID: 40295038
- DOI: 10.21873/anticanres.17596
The Long-term Outcomes of Borderline Resectable T3 in Locally Advanced Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma Treated With Neoadjuvant Triplet Chemotherapy
Abstract
Background/aim: This study compared the clinical characteristics and outcomes between patients with resectable clinical T3 (cT3r) and borderline resectable clinical T3 (cT3br) esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) who underwent neoadjuvant triplet chemotherapy.
Patients and methods: The study cohort comprised patients treated at our institution between January 2010 and November 2020 who underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy using a triplet regimen - either DCF or DCS - followed by esophagectomy for cT3. Eligible patients were divided into cT3r and cT3br groups.
Results: A total of 127 patients with cT3 ESCC were included, comprising 101 in the cT3r group and 26 in the cT3br group. The numbers of patients with complete response, partial response, stable disease, and progressive disease were significantly different between the cT3r and cT3br groups (4.9%, 52.5%, 8.9% and 3.0% vs. 3.9%, 42.3%, 19.2% and 23.1%, respectively; p=0.003). Anastomotic leakage (≥Clavien-Dindo grade III) occurred significantly more frequently in the cT3br group than in the cT3r group (38.5% vs. 9.9%, respectively; p=0.001). Surgical radicality of R0, R1, and R2 was significantly different between the cT3r and cT3br groups (93.0%, 4.0% and 3.0% vs. 57.6%, 7.7% and 34.7%, respectively; p<0.001). In survival analysis, the three-year recurrence-free and overall survival rates were significant different between the groups (53.1% vs. 24.9%; p<0.001, 59.8% vs. 32.6%, respectively; p<0.001). Multivariate analysis identified cT3br status (p=0.016) and poor histological response ≤1a (p<0.001) as independent prognostic factors for overall survival.
Conclusion: cT3br and poorer histological response were identified as prognostic factors of overall survival in this retrospective cohort study. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy alone may be insufficient to achieve curative outcomes in cT3br cases. For patients who do not respond adequately to initial chemotherapy, the addition of preoperative chemoradiotherapy may be necessary to enhance local tumor control and improve long-term survival.
Keywords: Esophageal cancer; T3br; borderline resectable; esophagectomy.
Copyright © 2025 International Institute of Anticancer Research (Dr. George J. Delinasios), All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
Preoperative neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy provides borderline resectable thoracic esophageal cancer with equivalent treatment results as clinically T3 thoracic esophageal cancer.Ann Gastroenterol Surg. 2023 Jun 11;7(6):904-912. doi: 10.1002/ags3.12706. eCollection 2023 Nov. Ann Gastroenterol Surg. 2023. PMID: 37927919 Free PMC article.
-
Short-and middle-term outcomes of robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy for highly locally advanced esophageal cancer with stage cT3 borderline and cT4b at initial diagnosis.Surg Endosc. 2025 May;39(5):2994-3005. doi: 10.1007/s00464-025-11666-9. Epub 2025 Mar 21. Surg Endosc. 2025. PMID: 40116900
-
Neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy versus neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in patients with borderline resectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.J Transl Med. 2025 Aug 16;23(1):922. doi: 10.1186/s12967-025-06672-3. J Transl Med. 2025. PMID: 40819038 Free PMC article.
-
Development of perioperative immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy for locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.Future Oncol. 2024;20(28):2097-2107. doi: 10.1080/14796694.2024.2345043. Epub 2024 May 17. Future Oncol. 2024. PMID: 38861290 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Multimodal Treatment of Resectable Esophageal Cancer.Ann Thorac Surg. 2025 Jan;119(1):70-82. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2024.04.034. Epub 2024 May 21. Ann Thorac Surg. 2025. PMID: 38777248 Review.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical