Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Apr 28;11(1):43.
doi: 10.1038/s41405-025-00323-x.

Comparing the effectiveness of an e-learning module at different levels of magnification for detecting occlusal caries in permanent teeth, utilizing the international caries detection and assessment system (ICDAS): an ex vivo study

Affiliations

Comparing the effectiveness of an e-learning module at different levels of magnification for detecting occlusal caries in permanent teeth, utilizing the international caries detection and assessment system (ICDAS): an ex vivo study

Mary Byju et al. BDJ Open. .

Abstract

Objective: The purpose of this study was to compare the effectiveness of low and high magnifications in detecting occlusal caries in permanent posterior teeth using the International Caries Detection and Assessment System (ICDAS) II criteria through the ICDAS e-learning program.

Materials and methods: Forty extracted permanent posterior teeth were used. Two examiners received e-learning training on the ICDAS webpage for detecting occlusal caries before visual examinations. Visual inspections were performed under ×2.5 magnification with a magnifying loupe and ×25 magnification with a dental surgical microscope within a week. The ICDAS scores assigned by both examiners were validated by an ICDAS expert. The visual assessment results were compared with the histological analysis results using Downer's criteria as the gold standard.

Results: Inter-examiner reliability for ICDAS-II scoring at low magnification (×2.5 loupe) and high magnification (×25 operating microscope) was moderate. However, the lenient (binary) criteria showed substantial agreement at both magnifications. Specificity was highest for both the low and high treatment thresholds (88.2% and 81.5%, respectively) at low magnification, whereas sensitivity peaked at high magnification for the high treatment threshold criterion (91.7%). Image-based ICDAS scoring by an expert also demonstrated good diagnostic accuracy (76.9%), though it was not superior to ICDAS scoring performed under ×2.5 magnification (82.1%).

Conclusion: The ICDAS-II score, particularly the lenient criterion, demonstrated a strong correlation with histological depth. The e-learning program effectively equips dentists with diagnostic skills. Extreme magnification resulted in the overestimation of dental caries, whereas low magnification (2.5x) resulted in greater diagnostic accuracy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: There are no conflicts of interest. Institutional Ethical Committee, Manipal College of Dental Sciences, Mangalore, clearance obtained (Ref. no. MCODS/15120). Consent to participate was not required for this study, as it was an ex vivo study. Permission to use extracted teeth was obtained from the Institutional Ethical Committee of Manipal College of Dental Sciences, Mangalore, India.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1. Carious lesions on occlusal surface and their corresponding histological sections.
Representative clinical images (A, C, E) and corresponding histological images (B, D, F) of occlusal caries. Histological section (B) represents Score 1; D represents Score 2 and F represents Score 3 based on Downer's histological scoring criteria.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Consolidated binary scores based on the threshold for treatment.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3. ROC curves and corresponding statistical summaries for two visual methods assessed against histological criteria.
A corresponds to Criterion 1 (low treatment threshold), and B to Criterion 2 (high treatment threshold). Each panel displays an ROC curve along with a table summarizing the Area Under the Curve (AUC) and related statistical measures for key variables.

Similar articles

References

    1. Marczuk-Kolada G, Luczaj-Cepowicz E, Obidzinska M, Rozycki J. Performance of ICDAS II and fluorescence methods on detection of occlusal caries-An ex vivo study. Photodiagn Photodyn Ther. 2020;29:101609. - PubMed
    1. Luczaj-Cepowicz E, Marczuk-Kolada G, Obidzinska M, Sidun J. Diagnostic validity of the use of ICDAS II and DIAGNOdent pen verified by micro-computed tomography for the detection of occlusal caries lesions-an in vitro evaluation. Lasers Med Sci. 2019;34:1655–63. - PubMed
    1. Novaes TF, Matos R, Gimenez T, Braga MM, DE Benedetto MS, Mendes FM. Performance of fluorescence-based and conventional methods of occlusal caries detection in primary molars - an in vitro study. Int J Paediatr Dent. 2012;22:459–66. - PubMed
    1. Diniz MB, Rodrigues JA, Hug I, Cordeiro Rde C, Lussi A. Reproducibility and accuracy of the ICDAS-II for occlusal caries detection. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2009;37:399–404. - PubMed
    1. Neuhaus KW, Jost F, Perrin P, Lussi A. Impact of different magnification levels on visual caries detection with ICDAS. J Dent. 2015;43:1559–64. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources