Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Mar 27;17(3):e81323.
doi: 10.7759/cureus.81323. eCollection 2025 Mar.

Assessment of Long-Term Outcomes of Lower Limb Fractures Managed by Non-orthopaedic Specialist Surgeons in Rural Rwanda: A Pilot Feasibility Study

Affiliations

Assessment of Long-Term Outcomes of Lower Limb Fractures Managed by Non-orthopaedic Specialist Surgeons in Rural Rwanda: A Pilot Feasibility Study

Lotta Velin et al. Cureus. .

Abstract

Introduction Sub-Saharan Africa is disproportionately affected by injuries, and short-term morbidity and mortality are high in this context. Lower limb fractures (LLFs) are a common type of injury that can lead to severe disability with extensive negative social and economic consequences. However, little is known about the long-term outcomes of LLFs in sub-Saharan Africa. In this pilot study, we describe the feasibility of assessing epidemiological patterns of LLFs, the state of care, and long-term outcomes in rural Rwanda. Methods This study was conducted from July to December 2021. It consists of retrospective data collection from hospital charts and a cross-sectional, phone-based follow-up. Functional outcomes were assessed using the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS; World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland) 2.0, and health-related quality of life (QoL) was assessed using a 36-Item Short Form Health Survey questionnaire (SF-36). Results Eighteen patients were included in the study, of which the majority were males (n=11, 61%), young adults (mean age 29, standard deviation (SD) 25), and without any previous comorbidities (n=16, 89%). Most patients had a single fracture, although nearly one-third presented with multi-trauma (n=5, 28%). The most common injury cause was falls (n=10, 56%). Fractures were most common in the femur/hip (n=10, 56%), and most fractures were closed (n=14, 78%) and non-comminuted (n=9, 50%). Disability was described as high, with a total mean WHODAS summary score of 80 (SD 29), whereas health-related QoL varied across the SF-36 domains, with "general health" being the lowest rated domain with a mean score of 30 (SD 25). Conclusion This study highlights the challenges of long-term follow-up after LLFs in a rural, low-resource setting but demonstrates that such a study is feasible if planned with contextual considerations. Self-perceived disability is high, and health-related QoL is low at long-term follow-up, which should be viewed in light of the fact that it primarily affects a young, previously healthy population.

Keywords: east africa; functional and clinical outcome; functional disability; health-related quality of life; long-term outcome; low- and middle-income country; lower extremity trauma.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Human subjects: Consent for treatment and open access publication was obtained or waived by all participants in this study. Rwanda National Ethics Committee issued approval No.141RNEC/2023. The study was approved by the Rwanda National Ethics Committee on May 5, 2023. Animal subjects: All authors have confirmed that this study did not involve animal subjects or tissue. Conflicts of interest: In compliance with the ICMJE uniform disclosure form, all authors declare the following: Payment/services info: Barnabas Alayande and Alex Zhuang are supported by the Fogarty International Center and National Institute of Mental Health, of the National Institutes of Health under Award Number D43 TW010543. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health. . Financial relationships: All authors have declared that they have no financial relationships at present or within the previous three years with any organizations that might have an interest in the submitted work. Other relationships: All authors have declared that there are no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Visualization of the recruitment process with the inclusion and exclusion of study participants.
CHW: Community health worker.
Figure 2
Figure 2. The distribution of WHODAS domain mean scores among the participants, ranging from one to five, representing “no disability” to “extreme disability.”
WHODAS: World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule.

Similar articles

References

    1. Global injury morbidity and mortality from 1990 to 2017: results from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017. James SL, Castle CD, Dingels ZV, et al. Inj Prev. 2020;26:0–114. - PMC - PubMed
    1. 24 h mortality and its predictors among road traffic accident victims in a resource limited setting; a multicenter cohort study. Kamabu K, La O Soria J, Tumwesigye D, et al. BMC Surg. 2023;23:97. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Epidemiology of injuries and outcomes among trauma patients receiving prehospital care at a tertiary teaching hospital in Kigali, Rwanda. Mbanjumucyo G, George N, Kearney A, et al. Afr J Emerg Med. 2016;6:191–197. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Trauma mortality patterns in three nations at different economic levels: implications for global trauma system development. Mock CN, Jurkovich GJ, nii-Amon-Kotei D, et al. https://journals.lww.com/jtrauma/abstract/1998/05000/trauma_mortality_pa.... J Trauma. 1998;44:804–812. - PubMed
    1. Current status of musculoskeletal trauma care systems worldwide. Miclau T, Hoogervorst P, Shearer DW, et al. J Orthop Trauma. 2018;32 Suppl 7:0–70. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources