Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Apr 14:7:1486296.
doi: 10.3389/fdgth.2025.1486296. eCollection 2025.

Social media and internet use among orthopedic patients in Germany-a multicenter survey

Yasmin Youssef #  1 , Tu-Lan Vu-Han #  2   3 , Richard Trauth  4 , Georg Osterhoff  1 , David Alexander Back  2 , Tobias Gehlen  2   5
Affiliations

Social media and internet use among orthopedic patients in Germany-a multicenter survey

Yasmin Youssef et al. Front Digit Health. .

Abstract

Background: Social media (SM) is increasingly used in the healthcare system and offers various benefits for patients such as accessible health information and communication with other patients and healthcare professionals. However, SM also poses risks, including the dissemination of medical misinformation and privacy concerns. This in turn can influence patients' health-related decision-making and the patient-physician relationship. There is limited data regarding which SM orthopedic patients use and what benefits and risks of SM they perceive.

Methods: An online survey was conducted from April to December 2023 among orthopedic and trauma patients in five German orthopedic clinics. The questionnaire with 32 variables was designed to assess internet and SM usage patterns, platform preferences, and perceived benefits and risks. Statistical analysis was performed, including subgroup analyses.

Results: A total of 267 patients participated, with 82.0% reporting regular SM use. In total 45.9% of the patients used SM for general health questions and 51.3% for orthopedic-related questions. The most used information platforms were conventional websites, YouTube, Instagram, and messenger apps. A total of 45.9% used SM infrequently for general health questions, and 51.3% for orthopedic-related queries. Only 13.7% of patients agreed that SM helped in medical decision-making, and 31.1% felt confident in assessing the credibility of SM content. Additionally, 58.6% of patients were unsure about allowing physicians to present their cases on SM, and 62.3% were uncertain about posting their medical images.

Conclusion: Among German orthopedic patients, the use of SM for health-related and gain of orthopedic information was low in the given study. While SM may offer valuable health information, their role in medical decision-making remains limited due to concerns over content credibility and privacy. Video-based content seems to achieve the best reach. Future research should explore these aspects longitudinally and across diverse populations to better understand and address the challenges and benefits of SM in healthcare.

Keywords: communication; digitalization; orthopedics; patients; social media.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
(a) social media use for general health information ranked by frequency (255 responses) (b) social media use regarding orthopedic and trauma questions ranked by frequency (197 responses) (c) digital platform preferences according to age group.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Specific health-related uses of social media by platform.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Plotting of Likert-scale responses to statements on health-related decision-making and self-stated SM competences.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Akram W, Kumar R. A study on positive and negative effects of social Media on society. Int J Comput Sci Eng. (2017) 5:351–4. 10.26438/ijcse/v5i10.351354 - DOI
    1. Siddiqui S, Singh T. Social media its impact with positive and negative aspects. Int J Comput Appl Technol Res. (2016) 5:71–5. 10.7753/IJCATR0502.1006 - DOI
    1. Duffett RG. Influence of social media marketing communications on young consumers’ attitudes. Young Consum. (2017) 18:19–39. 10.1108/YC-07-2016-00622 - DOI
    1. Jeyaraman M, Ramasubramanian S, Kumar S, Jeyaraman N, Selvaraj P, Nallakumarasamy A, et al. Multifaceted role of social media in healthcare: opportunities, challenges, and the need for quality control. Cureus. (2023) 15:e39111. 10.7759/cureus.39111 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Chen J, Wang Y. Social media use for health purposes: systematic review. J Med Internet Res. (2021) 23:e17917. 10.2196/17917 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources