Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2025 Apr 29;4(4):CD006839.
doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006839.pub5.

Treatment for ulnar neuropathy at the elbow

Pietro Caliandro  1 , Giuseppe La Torre  2 , Roberto Padua  3 , Fabio Giannini  4 , Giuseppe Reale  5 , Luca Padua  5
Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Treatment for ulnar neuropathy at the elbow

Pietro Caliandro et al. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. .

Abstract

Background: Ulnar neuropathy at the elbow (UNE) is the second most common entrapment neuropathy after carpal tunnel syndrome. Treatment may be conservative or surgical, but optimal management remains controversial. This is an update of a review first published in 2011 and previously updated in 2012 and 2016.

Objectives: To determine the effectiveness and safety of conservative and surgical treatment for ulnar neuropathy at the elbow (UNE). We intended to test whether: - surgical treatment is effective in reducing symptoms and signs and in increasing nerve function; - conservative treatment is effective in reducing symptoms and signs and in increasing nerve function; - it is possible to identify the best treatment on the basis of clinical, neurophysiological, or nerve imaging assessment.

Search methods: We searched the Cochrane Neuromuscular Specialised Register, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE, Embase, four other databases, ClinicalTrials.gov, and the World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform to July 2022.

Selection criteria: The review included only randomised controlled clinical trials (RCTs) or quasi-RCTs evaluating people with clinical symptoms suggesting the presence of UNE. We included trials evaluating all forms of surgical and conservative treatments. We considered studies regarding therapy of UNE with or without neurophysiological evidence of entrapment.

Data collection and analysis: Two review authors independently reviewed titles and abstracts of references retrieved from the searches and selected all potentially relevant studies. The review authors independently extracted data from included trials and assessed risk of bias. We contacted trial investigators for any missing information. The primary outcome was clinically relevant improvement in function compared to baseline. The secondary outcomes of interest were change in neurological impairment, change from baseline of the motor nerve conduction velocity across the elbow, change from baseline in the nerve diameter/cross-sectional area at the elbow, evaluated by ultrasound or MRI, change in quality of life and adverse events. We used GRADE methodology to assess the certainty of evidence.

Main results: We included 15 RCTs (970 participants), of which six studies were new for this update. Sequence generation was inadequate in one study and not described in six studies; other studies had a low risk of selection bias. We evaluated the clinical outcomes (3 trials, 261 participants) and neurophysiological outcomes (2 trials, 101 participants) of simple decompression versus decompression with submuscular or subcutaneous transposition. Moreover, we evaluated the clinical outcomes of endoscopic versus open decompression surgery (2 trials, 99 participants). We found there was probably little to no difference in clinical improvement in function for simple decompression versus subcutaneous transposition (risk ratio (RR) 0.92, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.74 to 1.14; 1 study, 147 participants) and simple decompression versus submuscular transposition (RR 0.95, 95% CI 0.77 to 1.17; 2 studies, 114 participants). Compared to simple decompression, we found little to no difference in wound infections for subcutaneous transposition (RR 0.29, 95% CI 0.06 to 1.35; 1 study, 147 participants) and submuscular transposition (RR 0.35, 95% CI 0.10 to 1.21; 2 studies, 114 participants). We found no difference between endoscopic and open decompression in terms of postoperative clinical improvement measured by the Bishop score (RR 0.98, 95% CI 0.84 to 1.14; 2 studies, 99 participants). Among surgical treatments, further single trials investigated postsurgical electrical stimulation after open decompression, nerve decompression and transposition with supercharged end-to-side anterior interosseous nerve-to-ulnar motor nerve transfer. Among conservative treatments for mild or moderate UNE, single trials explored the efficacy of participants' education, night splinting, nerve gliding exercises, corticosteroid and dextrose perineural injection.

Authors' conclusions: Low- to moderate-certainty evidence indicates that there is little to no difference in terms of improvement in function or surgical complications between simple decompression and decompression with subcutaneous or submuscular transposition in idiopathic UNE, including when the nerve impairment is severe. Moderate-certainty evidence indicates that there is little to no difference between endoscopic and open decompression in improving clinical function and in terms of procedural complications. Very low-certainty evidence indicates that it is unclear if steroid injections have an effect on clinical improvement, compared to placebo, and if written instructions have an effect on clinical improvement, compared to surgical decompression. Findings from a small RCT on conservative treatment showed that in mild cases, information on movements or positions to avoid may reduce subjective discomfort. One RCT showed that dextrose injection might reduce pain at either short-term (four months) or long-term follow-up (12 months), compared to placebo. Another RCT did not show differences in clinically relevant improvement between dextrose and corticosteroid injection. In clinically severe UNE, findings from a small RCT showed that postsurgical electrical stimulation improves intrinsic muscle reinnervation and strength at 12 months' follow-up.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

PC: none known

GLT: none known

RP: none known

FG: none known

GR: none known

LP: none known

Update of

References

References to studies included in this review

Bartels 2005 {published data only}
    1. Bartels RH, Verhagen WI, Wilt GJ, Meulstee J, Rossum LG, Grotenhuis JA. Prospective randomized controlled study comparing simple decompression versus anterior subcutaneous transposition for idiopathic neuropathy of the ulnar nerve at the elbow: Part 1. Neurosurgery 2005;56(3):522-30. [PMID: ] - PubMed
Biggs 2006 {published data only}
    1. Biggs M, Curtis JA. Randomized, prospective study comparing ulnar neurolysis in situ with submuscular transposition. Neurosurgery 2006;58(2):296-304. [PMID: ] - PubMed
Gervasio 2005 {published data only}
    1. Gervasio O, Gambardella G, Zaccone C, Branca D. Simple decompression versus anterior submuscular transposition of the ulnar nerve in severe cubital tunnel syndrome: a prospective randomized study. [Erratum appears in Neurosurgery. 2005 Feb;56(2):409]. Neurosurgery 2005;56(1):108-17. [PMID: ] - PubMed
Geutjens 1996 {published data only}
    1. Geutjens GG, Langstaff RJ, Smith NJ, Jefferson D, Howell CJ, Barton NJ. Medial epicondylectomy or ulnar-nerve transposition for ulnar neuropathy at the elbow? Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. British Volume 1996;78(5):777-9. [PMID: ] - PubMed
Krejčíy 2018 {published data only}
    1. T Krejčí, Z Večeřa, O Krejčí, D Šalounová, M Houdek, Radim Lipina. Comparing endoscopic and open decompression of the ulnar nerve in cubital tunnel syndrome: a prospective randomized study. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2018;160(10):2011-7. - PubMed
Liang‐Cheng 2020 {published data only}
    1. Chen LC, Ho TY, Shen YP, Su YC, Li TY, Tsai CK, et al. Perineural dextrose and corticosteroid injections for ulnar neuropathy at the elbow: a randomized double-blind trial. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 2020;101:1296-303. [DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2020.03.016] - DOI - PubMed
Mansiz‐Kaplan 2022 {published data only}
    1. Mansiz-Kaplan B, Nacir B, Pervane-Vural S, Tosun-Meric O, Duyur-Cakit B, Genc H. Effect of perineural dextrose injection on ulnar neuropathy at the elbow: a randomized, controlled, double-blind study. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 2022;103:2085-91. [DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2022.04.013] - DOI - PubMed
Nabhan 2005 {published data only}
    1. Nabhan A, Ahlhelm F, Kelm J, Reith W, Schwerdtfeger K, Steudel WI. Simple decompression or subcutaneous anterior transposition of the ulnar nerve for cubital tunnel syndrome. Journal of Hand Surgery. British Volume 2005;30(5):521-24. [PMID: ] - PubMed
Pompe 2020 {published data only}
    1. Pompe SM, Schreuder T, Teunissen LL, Visser LH, Beekman R. In situ decompression vs conservative treatment for mild ulnarneuropathy at the elbow. Muscle Nerve 2020;62:247-53. [DOI: 10.1002/mus.26912] - DOI - PubMed
Power 2020 {published data only}
    1. Power HA, Morhart MJ, Olson JL, Chan KM. Postsurgical electrical stimulation enhances recovery following surgery for severe cubital tunnel syndrome: a double-blind randomized controlled trial. Neurosurgery 2020;86:769–77. [DOI: 10.1093/neuros/nyz322] - DOI - PubMed
Schmidt 2014 {published data only}
    1. Schmidt S, Kleist Welch-Guerra W, Matthes M, Baldauf J, Schminke U, Schroeder HW. Endoscopic vs open decompression of the ulnar nerve in cubital tunnel syndrome: a prospective randomized double-blind study. Neurosurgery 2015;77(6):960-70. [PMID: ] - PubMed
Svernlov 2009 {published data only}
    1. Svernlöv B, Larsson M, Rehn K, Adolfsson L. Conservative treatment of the cubital tunnel syndrome. Journal of Hand Surgery. European Volume 2009;34(2):201–7. [PMID: ] - PubMed
vanVeen 2015 {published data only}
    1. vanVeen KE, Alblas KC, Alons IM, Kerklaan JP, Siegersma MC, Wesstein M, et al. Corticosteroid injection in patients with ulnar neuropathy at the elbow: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Muscle & Nerve 2015;52(3):380-85. [PMID: ] - PubMed
Xie 2022 {published data only}
    1. Xie Q, Shao X, Song X, Wang F, Zhang X, Wang L, et al. Ulnar nerve decompression and transposition with versus without supercharged end-to-side motor nerve transfer for advanced cubital tunnel syndrome: a randomized comparison study. J Neurosurg 2022;136(3):845-55. [DOI: 10.3171/2021.2.JNS203508] - DOI - PubMed
Zarezadeh 2012 {published data only}
    1. Zarezadeh A, Shemshaki H, Nourbakhsh M, Etemadifar MR, Moeini M, Mazoochian F. Comparison of anterior subcutaneous and submuscular transposition of ulnar nerve in treatment of cubital tunnel syndrome: a prospective randomized trial. Journal of Research in Medical Sciences 2012;17(8):745-49. - PMC - PubMed

References to studies excluded from this review

Chen 2006 {published data only}
    1. Chen Y, Hong G, Wang F. Therapeutic effect evaluation of ulnar neurolysis and nerve anterior transposition with an immediate range of motion in the aged. Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Ke Za Zhi 2006;20(8):809-11. - PubMed
Zhong 2011 {published data only}
    1. Zhong W, Zhang W, Zheng X, Li S, Shi J. Comparative study of different surgical transposition methods for ulnar nerve entrapment at the elbow. Journal of International Medical Research 2011;39(5):1766-72. - PubMed

References to studies awaiting assessment

Schwarm 2022 {published data only}
    1. Schwarm F, Nagl J, Graf K, Reinges MH, Uhl E, Krishnan KG, et al. A prospective randomized study comparing retractor-endoscopic vs. open release of carpal tunnel and cubital tunnel syndromes. Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery 2022;222:107437. [DOI: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2022.107437] - DOI - PubMed
Xuelei 2023 {published data only}
    1. Xuelei Z, Xiaolei X, Ping W, Yaxin H, Wenli C, Jianyong Z. Intraoperative electrical stimulation promotes the short-term recovery of patients with cubital tunnel syndrome after surgery. Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research 2023;18:270. [DOI: 10.1186/s13018-023-03668-x] - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Additional references

AAEM 1999
    1. American Association of Electrodiagnostic Medicine. Practice parameter for electrodiagnostic studies in ulnar neuropathy at the elbow: summary statement. American Association of Electrodiagnostic Medicine, American Academy of Neurology, American Academy of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. Muscle & Nerve 1999;22(3):408-11. [PMID: ] - PubMed
Bartels 2005a
    1. Bartels RH, Verhagen WI, Wilt GJ, Meulstee J, Rossum LG, Grotenhuis JA. Prospective randomized controlled study comparing simple decompression versus anterior subcutaneous transposition for idiopathic neuropathy of the ulnar nerve at the elbow: Part 1. Neurosurgery 2005;56(3):522-30. - PubMed
Bartels 2005b
    1. Bartels RH, Termeer EH, Wilt GJ, Rossum LG, Meulstee J, Verhagen WI, et al. Simple decompression or anterior subcutaneous transportation for ulnar neuropathy at the elbow: a cost-minimization analysis: Part 2. Neurosurgery 2005;56(3):531-6. - PubMed
Beekman 2004
    1. Beekman R, Schoemaker MC, Van Der Plas JP, Van Den Berg LH, Franssen H, Wokke JH, et al. Diagnostic value of high-resolution sonography in ulnar neuropathy at the elbow. Neurology 2004;62(5):767-73. - PubMed
Beekman 2009
    1. Beekman R, Schreuder AH, Rozeman CA, Koehler PJ, Uitdehaag BM. The diagnostic value of provocative clinical tests in ulnar neuropathy at the elbow is marginal. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry 2009;80(12):1369-74. - PubMed
Bell‐Krotoski 1987
    1. Bell-Krotoski J, Tomancik E. The repeatability of testing with Semmes-Weinstein monofilaments. Journal of Hand Surgery. American Volume 1987;12(1):155-61. - PubMed
BMRC 1976
    1. Medical Research Council (Great Britain). Aids to examination of the peripheral nervous system. Medical Research Council Memorandum No. 45. London: Her Majesty’s Stationery Office, 1976.
Bordalo 2004
    1. Bordalo-Rodrigues M, Rosenberg ZS. MR imaging of entrapment neuropathies at the elbow. Magnetic Resonance Imaging Clinics of North America 2004;12(2):247-63, vi. - PubMed
Dellon 1989
    1. Dellon AL. Review of treatment results for ulnar nerve entrapment at the elbow. Journal of Hand Surgery. American Volume 1989;14(4):688-700. - PubMed
Dellon 1993
    1. Dellon AL, Hament W, Gittelshon A. Nonoperative management of cubital tunnel syndrome: an 8-year prospective study. Neurology 1993;43(9):1673-7. - PubMed
DerSimonian 1986
    1. DerSimonian R, Laird N. Meta-analysis in clinical trials. Controlled Clinical Trials 1986;7(3):177-88. - PubMed
Eaton 1980
    1. Eaton RG, Crowe JF, Parkes JC 3rd. Anterior transposition of the ulnar nerve using a non-compressing fasciodermal sling. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. American Volume 1980;62(5):820-5. - PubMed
Egger 1997
    1. Egger M, Davey Smith G, Schneider M, Minder C. Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. BMJ 1997;315(7109):629-34. - PMC - PubMed
Higgins 2011
    1. Higgins JP, Green S, editor(s). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0 (updated March 2011). The Cochrane Collaboration, 2011. Available from https://training.cochrane.org/handbook/archive/v5.1/.
Hudak 1996
    1. Hudak PL, Amadio PC, Bombardier C. Development of an upper extremity outcome measure: the DASH (disabilities of the arm, shoulder, and hand). The Upper Extremity Collaborative Group (UECG). American Journal of Industrial Medicine 1996;29(6):602-8. - PubMed
Kleinman 1989
    1. Kleinman WB, Bishop AT. Anterior intramuscular transposition of the ulnar nerve. Journal of Hand Surgery. American Volume 1989;14(6):972-9. - PubMed
Kuschner 1996
    1. Kuschner SH. Cubital tunnel syndrome: treatment by medial epicondylectomy. Hand Clinics 1996;12(2):411-9. - PubMed
Macadam 2008
    1. Macadam SA, Gandhi R, Bezuhly M, Lefaivre KA. Simple decompression versus anterior subcutaneous and submuscular transposition of the ulnar nerve for cubital tunnel syndrome: a meta-analysis. Journal of Hand Surgery. American Volume 2008;33(8):1314.e1-12. - PubMed
Mackinnon 2015
    1. Mackinnon SE, Yee A. Nerve Surgery. New York: Thieme, 2015. [DOI: 10.1055/b-003-106416] - DOI
Mondelli 2005
    1. Mondelli M, Giannini F, Ballerini M, Gianneschi F, Martorelli E. Incidence of ulnar neuropathy at the elbow in the province of Siena (Italy). Journal of the Neurological Sciences 2005;234(1-2):5-10. - PubMed
Mondelli 2006
    1. Mondelli M, Padua L, Giannini F, Bibbò G, Aprile I, Rossi S. A self-administered questionnaire of ulnar neuropathy at the elbow. Neurological Sciences 2006;27(6):402-11. - PubMed
Padua 2001
    1. Padua L, Aprile I, Mazza O, Padua R, Pietracci E, Caliandro P, et al. Neurophysiological classification of ulnar entrapment across the elbow. Neurological Sciences 2001;22(1):11-6. - PubMed
Palmer 2010
    1. Palmer AB, Hughes TB. Cubital tunnel syndrome. Journal of Hand Surgery. American Volume 2010;35(1):153-63. - PubMed
RevMan 2014 [Computer program]
    1. Review Manager 5 (RevMan 5). Version 5.3. Copenhagen: The Cochrane Collaboration, 2014.
Robertson 2005
    1. Robertson C, Saratsiotis J. A review of compressive ulnar neuropathy at the elbow. Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics 2005;28(5):345. - PubMed
Schünemann 2011
    1. Schünemann HJ, Oxman AD, Vist GE, Higgins JP, Deeks JJ, Glasziou P, et al. Chapter 12: Interpreting results and drawing conclusions. In: Higgins JP, Green S, editor(s). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0 (updated March 2011). The Cochrane Collaboration, 2011. Available from https://training.cochrane.org/handbook/archive/v5.1/.
Song 2012
    1. Song JW, Chung KC, Prosser LA. Treatment of ulnar neuropathy at the elbow: cost-utility analysis. Journal of Hand Surgery. American Volume 2012;37(8):1617-29. - PMC - PubMed
Sriwatanakul 1983
    1. Sriwatanakul K, Kelvie W, Lasagna L, Calimlim JF, Weis OF, Mehta G. Studies with different types of visual analog scales for measurement of pain. Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics 1983;34(2):234-9. - PubMed
Tsai 1999
    1. Tsai TM, Chen IC, Majd ME, Lim BH. Cubital tunnel release with endoscopic assistance: results of a new technique. Journal of Hand Surgery. American Volume 1999;24(1):21-9. - PubMed
Ware 1992
    1. Ware JE Jr, Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Medical Care 1992;30(6):473-83. - PubMed
Zlowodzki 2007
    1. Zlowodzki M, Chan S, Bhandari M, Kalliainen L, Schubert W. Anterior transposition compared with simple decompression for treatment of cubital tunnel syndrome. A meta-analysis of randomized, controlled trials. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. American Volume 2007;89(12):2591-8. - PubMed

References to other published versions of this review

Caliandro 2011
    1. Caliandro P, La Torre G, Padua R, Giannini F, Padua L. Treatment for ulnar neuropathy at the elbow. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2011, Issue 2. Art. No: CD006839. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD006839.pub2] - DOI - PubMed
Caliandro 2012
    1. Caliandro P, La Torre G, Padua R, Giannini F, Padua L. Treatment for ulnar neuropathy at the elbow. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2012, Issue 7. Art. No: CD006839. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD006839.pub3] - DOI - PubMed
Caliandro 2016
    1. Caliandro P, La Torre G, Padua R, Giannini F, Padua L. Treatment for ulnar neuropathy at the elbow. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2016, Issue 11. Art. No: CD006839. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD006839.pub4] - DOI - PMC - PubMed

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources