Beyond Gleason grading: MRI radiomics to differentiate cribriform growth from non-cribriform growth in prostate cancer men
- PMID: 40299156
- DOI: 10.1007/s10334-025-01251-5
Beyond Gleason grading: MRI radiomics to differentiate cribriform growth from non-cribriform growth in prostate cancer men
Abstract
Objective: To differentiate cribriform (GP4Crib+) from non-cribriform growth and Gleason 3 patterns (GP4Crib-/GP3) using MRI.
Methods: Two hundred and ninety-one operated prostate cancer men with pre-treatment MRI and whole-mount prostate histology were retrospectively included. T2-weighted, apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) and fractional blood volume maps from 1.5/3T MRI systems were used. 592 histological GP3, GP4Crib- and GP4Crib+ regions were segmented on whole-mount specimens and manually co-registered to MRI sequences/maps. Radiomics features were extracted, and an erosion process was applied to minimize the impact of delineation uncertainties. A logistic regression model was developed to differentiate GP4Crib+ from GP3/GP4Crib- in the 465 remaining regions. The differences in balanced accuracy between the model and baseline (where all regions are labeled as GP3/GP4Crib-) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for all metrics were assessed using bootstrapping.
Results: The logistic regression model, using the 90th percentile ADC feature with a negative coefficient, showed a balanced accuracy of 0.65 (95% CI: 0.48-0.79), receiver operating characteristic area under the curve (AUC) of 0.75 (95% CI: 0.54-0.92), a precision-recall AUC of 0.35 (95% CI: 0.14-0.68).
Conclusion: The radiomics MRI-based model, trained on Gleason sub-patterns segmented on whole-mount specimen, was able to differentiate GP4Crib+ from GP3/GP4Crib- patterns with moderate accuracy. The most dominant feature was the 90th percentile ADC. This exploratory study highlights 90th percentile ADC as a potential biomarker for cribriform growth differentiation, providing insights into future MRI-based risk assessment strategies.
Keywords: ADC; Cribriform growth; MRI; Prostatectomy; Radiomics.
© 2025. The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
Declarations. Conflict of interest: The authors have no competing interests to declare that are relevant to the content of this article. Ethical approval: The studies involving humans were approved by the Netherlands Cancer Institute—IRBd21-108. The studies were conducted in accordance with the local legislation and institutional requirements. Consent to participate: The ethics committee/institutional review board waived the requirement of written informed consent for participation from the participants or the participants’ legal guardians/next of kin because pursuant to national legislation prior to 25 May 2018 (Opt-out) and general hospital informed consent was considered.
References
-
- Sathianathen NJ, Omer A, Harriss E, Davies L, Kasivisvanathan V, Punwani S, Moore CM, Kastner C, Barrett T, Van Den Bergh RC, Eddy BA, Gleeson F, Macpherson R, Bryant RJ, Catto JWF, Murphy DG, Hamdy FC, Ahmed HU, Lamb AD (2020) Negative predictive value of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging in the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer in the prostate imaging reporting and data system era: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Urol 78(3):402–414 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Network NCC (2023) Prostate Cancer (Version 3.2023). https://www.nccn.org/guidelines/guidelines-detail?category=1&id=1459 .
-
- Eastham JA, Auffenberg GB, Barocas DA, Chou R, Crispino T, Davis JW, Eggener S, Horwitz EM, Kane CJ, Kirkby E, Lin DW, McBride SM, Morgans AK, Pierorazio PM, Rodrigues G, Wong WW, Boorjian SA (2022) Clinically localized prostate cancer: aua/astro guideline, part i: introduction, risk assessment, staging, and risk-based management. J Urol 208(1):10–18 - DOI - PubMed
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources