Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 May 1;5(5):774-782.
doi: 10.1158/2767-9764.CRC-25-0057.

Preclinical Activity of Datopotamab Deruxtecan, an Antibody-Drug Conjugate Targeting Trophoblast Cell-Surface Antigen 2, in Uterine Serous Carcinoma

Affiliations

Preclinical Activity of Datopotamab Deruxtecan, an Antibody-Drug Conjugate Targeting Trophoblast Cell-Surface Antigen 2, in Uterine Serous Carcinoma

Michelle Greenman et al. Cancer Res Commun. .

Abstract

Uterine serous carcinoma (USC) is a rare subset of endometrial cancer with a poor prognosis and high recurrence rate. Datopotamab deruxtecan (Dato-DXd) is a novel antibody-drug conjugate (ADC). The objective of this study was to evaluate the preclinical activity of Dato-DXd in USC in vitro against primary USC cell lines with various trophoblast cell-surface antigen 2 (TROP2) expression and in vivo in TROP2-overexpressing cell line-derived mice xenografts. USC primary tumor cell lines were treated with Dato-DXd and a control ADC (CTL ADC) to evaluate cell viability following exposure. Antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity against TROP2-overexpressing and -nonexpressing cell lines was evaluated using a 4-hour chromium release assay. USC xenografts in mice were treated with Dato-DXd, CTL ADC, datopotamab, and vehicle to assess the in vivo effects via retro-orbital Dato-DXd administration. We found USC cell lines with TROP2 overexpression to be significantly more sensitive to killing induced by Dato-DXd compared with CTL ADC in vitro (e.g., IC50: 0.11 µmol/L vs. 30.07 µmol/L, P = 0.0074 and 0.11 µmol/L vs. 48.95 µmol/L, P = 0.0127, respectively). Dato-DXd induced antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity in the presence of peripheral blood lymphocytes from healthy donors. TROP2-nonexpressing cell lines demonstrated minimal killing by Dato-DXd; however, when admixed with TROP2-overexpressing cells, a significant bystander effect was appreciated. In vivo, mice xenografts overexpressing TROP2 treated with Dato-DXd demonstrated tumor growth suppression and longer overall survival compared with CTL ADC-treated xenografts. These data demonstrate Dato-DXd to be highly active against TROP2-overexpressing USC in vitro and in vivo. Our preclinical activity results warrant future clinical trials for patients with advanced or recurrent USC.

Significance: Targeted treatment of USC using the biomarker TROP2 represents a significant opportunity for further treatment options for patients already resistant to other lines of treatment. In this study, we present data showing preclinical evidence of effectiveness of this biomarker-targeted therapy in USC.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

A.D. Santin reports grants and personal fees from Gilead Sciences, R Pharm US, Daiichi Sankyo, and Merck and grants from Verastem Oncology outside the submitted work. No other disclosures were reported.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
IC50 value dose–response curves of Dato-DXd and CTL ADC in USC cell lines with variable TROP2 expression. A, TROP2 3+ ARK2 USC cell line: the mean IC50 value of Dato-DXd was 0.11 μg/mL vs. 30.07 μg/mL for CTL ADC (P = 0.0074). B, TROP2 3+ ARK20 USC cell line: the mean IC50 value of Dato-DXd was 0.11 μg/mL vs. 48.95 μg/mL for CTL ADC (P = 0.0127). C, TROP2 1+ ARK7 USC cell line: the mean IC50 value of Dato-DXd was 80.38 μg/mL vs. 61.79 μg/mL for CTL ADC. D, TROP2 ARK1 USC cell line: the mean IC50 value was 18.49 μg/mL vs. 17.12 μg/mL for CTL ADC (P = 0.65).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Bystander antitumor effect of TROP2-nonexpressing USC cells (ARK-4) when cocultured with TROP2 3+ USC ARK2 cell line treated with 0.5 μg/mL of Dato-DXd vs. CTL ADC. Dato-DXd had little effect on ARK-4 when they were cultured alone (83% lives cells); however, when ARK-4 was cocultured with TROP2 3+ ARK2, Dato-DXd induced significantly more ARK-4 cell killing (64.8% live cells, P = 0.0231). CTL ADC did not have significant cell killing with coculture (95% live cells).
Figure 3
Figure 3
ADCC results of Dato-DXd, datopotamab, rituximab, and CTL ADC in representative (A) ARK2 USC TROP2 3+, (B) ARK20 USC TROP2 3+, and (C) ARK1 USC TROP2-nonexpressing cell lines.
Figure 4
Figure 4
DNA breakage induced from cell internalization of DXd represented by the phosphorylation of H2AX. Greater staining at doses of 5 μg/mL seen with Dato-DXd treatment compared with CTL ADC.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Antitumor activity in mice inoculated with TROP2 3+ USC ARK2 xenograft tumor models (CDXs). A, CDX tumor volumes after treatment with Dato-DXd, datopotamab, CTL ADC, and vehicle control (PBS). Dato-DXd demonstrates significant tumor growth inhibition compared with datopotamab, CTL ADC, and vehicle CTL. B, OS in CDX after a single retro-orbital treatment with Dato-DXd compared with datopotamab, CTL ADC, and vehicle. OS was significantly prolonged among Dato-DXd–treated groups compared with other treatment groups.

Similar articles

References

    1. SEER, National Cancer Institute . Cancer stat facts: uterine cancer. 2022.
    1. Bogani G, Ray-Coquard I, Concin N, Ngoi NYL, Morice P, Enomoto T, et al. . Uterine serous carcinoma. Gynecol Oncol 2021;162:226–34. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ferriss JS, Erickson BK, Shih IM, Fader AN. Uterine serous carcinoma: key advances and novel treatment approaches. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2021;31:1165–74. - PubMed
    1. Abu-Rustum N, Yashar C, Arend R, Barber E, Bradley K, Brooks R, et al. . Uterine neoplasms, version 1.2023, NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 2023;21:181–209. - PubMed
    1. Khongorzul P, Ling CJ, Khan FU, Ihsan AU, Zhang J. Antibody-drug conjugates: a comprehensive review. Mol Cancer Res 2020;18:3–19. - PubMed

MeSH terms