The social influence of the corrections of vaccine misinformation on social media
- PMID: 40300437
- DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2025.127177
The social influence of the corrections of vaccine misinformation on social media
Abstract
This study examines the impact of social versus algorithmic corrections of vaccine misinformation on social media, on the perceptions of social norms around vaccination and vaccine intentions during a hypothetical pandemic. In an online randomised study with 720 participants, we assessed whether user-generated or algorithmically generated corrections influenced perceived social norms measured as beliefs about other's vaccination intentions (empirical expectations about vaccination), perception about the social appropriateness of vaccine refusal (normative expectations), and beliefs about others' perceptions of vaccine safety (second-order normative beliefs), and own vaccine intentions. User-generated corrections significantly increased the perceptions that refusing vaccination is socially very inappropriate and increased the perception that consensus is in support of vaccine safety. Algorithmic corrections did not influence social norm perceptions. Interestingly, neither social nor algorithmic corrections significantly altered empirical expectations about others' vaccination intentions. Both corrections also helped maintain participants' high initial vaccine intentions with algorithmic correction having stronger effects, in contrast to a significant decline in intentions observed in the control group exposed to misinformation without corrections. Algorithmic corrections from credible health agencies were effective in sustaining vaccine intentions, while user-generated corrections were more influential in improving perceptions of social norms. The findings suggests that different correction types on social media may influence distinct determinants of vaccination behaviour during a pandemic: user-generated corrections reshape perceived social norms of vaccination, while algorithmic corrections, citing credible sources, may better sustain high personal vaccine intentions.
Keywords: Algorithmic Correction; Misinformation Corrections; Perceived Social Norms; Social Corrections; Vaccine Intentions; Vaccine Misinformation.
Copyright © 2025 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Similar articles
-
A social norms approach intervention to address misperceptions of anti-vaccine conspiracy beliefs amongst UK parents.PLoS One. 2021 Nov 12;16(11):e0258985. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0258985. eCollection 2021. PLoS One. 2021. PMID: 34767581 Free PMC article.
-
Social norms and vaccine uptake: College students' COVID vaccination intentions, attitudes, and estimated peer norms and comparisons with influenza vaccine.Vaccine. 2021 Apr 8;39(15):2060-2067. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2021.03.018. Epub 2021 Mar 17. Vaccine. 2021. PMID: 33741191 Free PMC article.
-
Countering Antivax Misinformation via Social Media: Message-Testing Randomized Experiment for Human Papillomavirus Vaccination Uptake.J Med Internet Res. 2022 Nov 24;24(11):e37559. doi: 10.2196/37559. J Med Internet Res. 2022. PMID: 36422887 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
The Worrying Phenomenon of COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy and Its Negative Impact on Pandemic Control Efforts: Common Themes that Emerged in the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) Region.Adv Exp Med Biol. 2024;1457:299-322. doi: 10.1007/978-3-031-61939-7_17. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2024. PMID: 39283434 Review.
-
Vaccine Hesitancy: Where Are We Now?Pediatr Ann. 2025 May;54(5):e154-e159. doi: 10.3928/19382359-20250307-01. Epub 2025 May 1. Pediatr Ann. 2025. PMID: 40305634 Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical