Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2025 Apr;53(4):3000605251328893.
doi: 10.1177/03000605251328893. Epub 2025 Apr 29.

Molecular and biological markers for assessing endometrial receptivity in infertile women: A narrative review

Affiliations
Review

Molecular and biological markers for assessing endometrial receptivity in infertile women: A narrative review

Junfeng Li et al. J Int Med Res. 2025 Apr.

Abstract

Successful embryo implantation relies on embryo quality, endometrial receptivity, and the synchronized development of both. In recent years, methods for assessing endometrial receptivity have considerably advanced, shifting from traditional imaging techniques to modern molecular biology approaches. The evaluation of endometrial thickness, morphology, subendometrial blood flow, and peristalsis before implantation has become less prominent, whereas molecular markers such as pinopodes, integrin αvβ3, its ligand osteopontin, and homologous box gene A10 are widely used in clinical practice for assessing endometrial receptivity. To provide a comprehensive overview, this narrative review systematically searched PubMed and Web of Science for studies on endometrial receptivity assessment in infertile women over the past two decades, with a focus on both clinical and experimental research. This narrative review has examined recent advancements in morphological markers, endometrial receptivity-related genes, endometrial microbiota, and other emerging indicators, emphasizing their potential in optimizing embryo implantation and improving the success rates of assisted reproductive technologies. Notably, endometrial receptivity array testing and uterine microbiome analysis have gained substantial attention for their potential in personalized diagnosis and treatment. This review aims to provide scientific insights for precise infertility diagnostics and individualized treatment strategies while offering recommendations for future research development.

Keywords: Endometrial receptivity; endometrial microbiota; endometrial receptivity array; homologous box gene A10; integrin avβ3; leukemia inhibitory factor; pinocytosis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Similar articles

References

    1. Infertility prevalence estimates, 1990–2021. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2023.
    1. Wang SX. The past, present, and future of embryo selection in in vitro fertilization: frontiers in reproduction conference. Yale J Biol Med 2011; 84: 487–490. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Craciunas L, Gallos I, Chu J, et al.. Conventional and modern markers of endometrial receptivity: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod Update 2019; 25: 202–223. - PubMed
    1. Lessey BA, Young SL. What exactly is endometrial receptivity? Fertil Steril 2019; 111: 611–617. - PubMed
    1. Quinn KE, Matson BC, Wetendorf M, et al.. Pinopodes: recent advancements, current perspectives, and future directions. Mol Cell Endocrinol 2020; 501: 110644. - PMC - PubMed