Molecular and biological markers for assessing endometrial receptivity in infertile women: A narrative review
- PMID: 40300557
- PMCID: PMC12041708
- DOI: 10.1177/03000605251328893
Molecular and biological markers for assessing endometrial receptivity in infertile women: A narrative review
Abstract
Successful embryo implantation relies on embryo quality, endometrial receptivity, and the synchronized development of both. In recent years, methods for assessing endometrial receptivity have considerably advanced, shifting from traditional imaging techniques to modern molecular biology approaches. The evaluation of endometrial thickness, morphology, subendometrial blood flow, and peristalsis before implantation has become less prominent, whereas molecular markers such as pinopodes, integrin αvβ3, its ligand osteopontin, and homologous box gene A10 are widely used in clinical practice for assessing endometrial receptivity. To provide a comprehensive overview, this narrative review systematically searched PubMed and Web of Science for studies on endometrial receptivity assessment in infertile women over the past two decades, with a focus on both clinical and experimental research. This narrative review has examined recent advancements in morphological markers, endometrial receptivity-related genes, endometrial microbiota, and other emerging indicators, emphasizing their potential in optimizing embryo implantation and improving the success rates of assisted reproductive technologies. Notably, endometrial receptivity array testing and uterine microbiome analysis have gained substantial attention for their potential in personalized diagnosis and treatment. This review aims to provide scientific insights for precise infertility diagnostics and individualized treatment strategies while offering recommendations for future research development.
Keywords: Endometrial receptivity; endometrial microbiota; endometrial receptivity array; homologous box gene A10; integrin avβ3; leukemia inhibitory factor; pinocytosis.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Similar articles
-
Assessment of endometrial receptivity during implantation window in women with unexplained infertility.Gynecol Endocrinol. 2020 Oct;36(10):917-921. doi: 10.1080/09513590.2020.1727433. Epub 2020 Feb 19. Gynecol Endocrinol. 2020. PMID: 32070163
-
Dysregulated leukemia inhibitory factor and its receptor regulated signal transducers and activators of transcription 3 pathway: a possible cause for repeated implantation failure in women with dormant genital tuberculosis?Fertil Steril. 2016 Apr;105(4):1076-1084.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2015.12.015. Epub 2016 Jan 8. Fertil Steril. 2016. PMID: 26776907
-
Cargo small non-coding RNAs of extracellular vesicles isolated from uterine fluid associate with endometrial receptivity and implantation success.Fertil Steril. 2021 May;115(5):1327-1336. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2020.10.046. Epub 2020 Dec 4. Fertil Steril. 2021. PMID: 33272614
-
Identifying biomarkers for predicting successful embryo implantation: applying single to multi-OMICs to improve reproductive outcomes.Hum Reprod Update. 2020 Feb 28;26(2):264-301. doi: 10.1093/humupd/dmz042. Hum Reprod Update. 2020. PMID: 32096829 Review.
-
How endometrial secretomics can help in predicting implantation.Placenta. 2011 Sep;32 Suppl 3:S271-5. doi: 10.1016/j.placenta.2011.06.002. Epub 2011 Jun 23. Placenta. 2011. PMID: 21700334 Review.
References
-
- Infertility prevalence estimates, 1990–2021. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2023.
-
- Craciunas L, Gallos I, Chu J, et al.. Conventional and modern markers of endometrial receptivity: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod Update 2019; 25: 202–223. - PubMed
-
- Lessey BA, Young SL. What exactly is endometrial receptivity? Fertil Steril 2019; 111: 611–617. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials
Miscellaneous