Repurposing Antidiabetic Drugs for Cerebrovascular Diseases: Causal Evidence from Drug Target Mendelian Randomization and Colocalization
- PMID: 40301247
- DOI: 10.1007/s12035-025-04987-2
Repurposing Antidiabetic Drugs for Cerebrovascular Diseases: Causal Evidence from Drug Target Mendelian Randomization and Colocalization
Abstract
Cerebrovascular diseases have caused substantial social and economic burdens, and new treatment methods are urgently needed. Evaluating the feasibility of the use of antidiabetic drugs for treating cerebrovascular diseases is meaningful in this field. We designed a comprehensive study process that includes two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR), which uses genetic proxies for antidiabetic drug targets, summary-based MR (SMR) for mRNAs, and colocalization for drug target genes to assess their causal relationships with 10 cerebrovascular disease phenotypes. Seven of the eight main types of clinical antidiabetic drugs were identified, yielding eleven potential drug targets. Our study observed that sulfonylureas (KCNJ11) and metformin (GPD1) reduce the risk of stroke and that TZDs (PPARG) reduce the risk of hippocampal perivascular spaces. In addition, sulfonylureas can reduce the risk of certain cerebral small vessel disease. These results show that antidiabetic drugs have hypoglycemic properties and affect cerebrovascular health. Our study supports repurposing antidiabetic drugs as disease-modifying therapies to improve cerebrovascular health. Future research should focus on studying the role of drugs in different phenotypes of cerebrovascular diseases and explore the potential molecular mechanisms to analyze further the potential effects of antidiabetic drugs on cerebrovascular diseases.
Keywords: Antidiabetic drugs; Cerebrovascular diseases; Colocalization; Drug targets; Gene expression; Mendelian randomization.
© 2025. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.
Conflict of interest statement
Declarations. Ethics Approval: Ethical approval was waived for this study because ethical approval was obtained in the original studies. Patients or the public were not involved in the design, conduct, reporting, or dissemination of our research. Consent to Participate: Not applicable. Consent for Publication: All authors read and approved the final manuscript. Competing interest: The authors declare no competing interests.
References
-
- Miao R, Li J, Meng C, Li Y, Tang H, Wang J, Deng P, Lu Y (2022) Diet-derived circulating antioxidants and risk of stroke: a Mendelian randomization study. Oxid Med Cell Longev 2022:1–9. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/6457318 - DOI
-
- Feigin VL, Abate MD, Abate YH et al (2024) Global, regional, and national burden of stroke and its risk factors, 1990–2021: a systematic analysis for the global burden of disease study 2021. The Lancet Neurology 23(10):973–1003. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1474-4422(24)00369-7 - DOI
-
- Debette S, Schilling S, Duperron M-G, Larsson SC, Markus HS (2019) Clinical significance of magnetic resonance imaging markers of vascular brain injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Neurol 76(1):81. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaneurol.2018.3122 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Folsom AR, Rasmussen ML, Chambless LE, Howard G, Cooper LS, Schmidt MI, Heiss G (1999) Prospective associations of fasting insulin, body fat distribution, and diabetes with risk of ischemic stroke. Diabetes Care 22(7). https://doi.org/10.2337/diacare.22.7.1077
-
- Goldstein LB, Adams R, Becker K, Furberg CD, Gorelick PB, Hademenos G, Hill M, Howard G, Howard VJ, Jacobs B, Levine SR, Mosca L, Sacco RL, Sherman DG, Wolf PA (2001) Primary prevention of ischemic stroke. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.CIR.103.1.163
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous
