Evaluation of ketones intensive measurement in women with gestational diabetes (EVOKING) study
- PMID: 40301275
- DOI: 10.1007/s42000-025-00663-1
Evaluation of ketones intensive measurement in women with gestational diabetes (EVOKING) study
Abstract
Purpose: Women with gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) are frequently asked to check their ketone levels by measuring ketonuria before breakfast. However, ketosis could be present even before lunch and dinner. Furthermore, blood ketone measurement could be a more accurate test. Our aim was to evaluate the effect of a blood ketone intensive measurement in the detection of ketosis in women with GDM with a negative urinary ketone test.
Methods: This was a single center, observational, prospective study involving consecutive women with GDM. Only women with negative fasting urinary ketone tests were included. During the same gestational weeks (weeks 30-32), all women were asked to perform a blood ketone test before their main meals. Ketosis was defined as the presence for at least 25% of the time of fasting blood ketone levels > 0.1 mmol/L and > 0.2 mmol/L before lunch and dinner.
Results: Overall, a total of 101 women (mean age 34.7 ± 4.8 years, prepregnancy BMI 28.2 ± 5.2 kg/m2) were studied. Blood ketones were present in 37.6% of the cases before breakfast, 13.9% before lunch, and 11.9% before dinner. Women with at least one daily presence of blood ketones composed 40.6% of the sample. Presence of fasting blood ketones was correlated with ketone presence before lunch (r = 0.63, p < 0.0001) and before dinner (r = 0.55, p < 0.0001) and with mean glucose levels (r = 0.23, p = 0.02) 1 h after breakfast.
Conclusion: Blood ketone testing in women with GDM can detect a larger number of ketosis episodes than a urinary ketone test. Intensive blood ketone measurement should be recommended to women with GDM.
Keywords: Blood glucose; Blood ketones; Gestational diabetes; Urinary ketones.
© 2025. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Hellenic Endocrine Society.
Conflict of interest statement
Declarations. Ethics approval: All procedures involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional research committee (Ethics Committee of the University of Messina, prot. 52/18) and with the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments. Consent to participate: Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study. Consent for publication: All authors read and approved the final version of the manuscript for publication. Competing interests: The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Similar articles
-
Measurement of fasting ketonuria and capillary blood glucose after main meals in women with gestational diabetes mellitus: How well is the metabolic picture captured?J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2011 Jul;37(7):722-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1447-0756.2010.01415.x. Epub 2011 Mar 6. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2011. PMID: 21375677
-
[Blood glucose and ketone monitoring in type 1 diabetic patients in the controlled environment of a summer camp].An Pediatr (Barc). 2007 Apr;66(4):387-92. doi: 10.1157/13101244. An Pediatr (Barc). 2007. PMID: 17430716 Spanish.
-
[Clinical use of continuous glucose monitoring system in gestational diabetes mellitus and type 2 diabetes complicated with pregnancy].Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 2014 Aug;49(8):579-83. Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 2014. PMID: 25354857 Chinese.
-
Very tight vs. tight control: what should be the criteria for pharmacologic therapy dose adjustment in diabetes in pregnancy? Evidence from randomized controlled trials.Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2018 Mar;97(3):235-247. doi: 10.1111/aogs.13257. Epub 2017 Dec 14. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2018. PMID: 29125636 Review.
-
Exogenous ketone supplementation: an emerging tool for physiologists with potential as a metabolic therapy.Exp Physiol. 2023 Feb;108(2):177-187. doi: 10.1113/EP090430. Epub 2022 Dec 19. Exp Physiol. 2023. PMID: 36533967 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Corrado F, Pintaudi B, Di Vieste G, Interdonato ML, Magliarditi M, Santamaria A, D’Anna R, Di Benedetto A (2014) Italian risk factor-based screening for gestational diabetes. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 27:1445–1448. https://doi.org/10.3109/14767058.2013.860961 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Paulo MS, Abdo NM, Bettencourt-Silva R, Al-Rifai RH (2021) Gestational diabetes mellitus in Europe: A systematic review and Meta-Analysis of prevalence studies. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) 12:691033. https://doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2021.691033 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Metzger BE, Coustan DR (1998) Summary and recommendations of the Fourth International Workshop-Conference on Gestational Diabetes Mellitus. The Organizing Committee. Diabetes Care 30(Suppl 2): S251–S260. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc07-s225
-
- Ye W, Luo C, Huang J, Li C, Liu Z, Liu F et al (2022) Gestational diabetes mellitus and adverse pregnancy outcomes: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ (Clinical Res ed) 377:e067946. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj-2021-067946 - DOI
-
- Sweeting A, Wong J, Murphy HR, Ross GP (2022) A clinical update on gestational diabetes mellitus. Endocr Rev 43(5):763–793. https://doi.org/10.1210/endrev/bnac003 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources